<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hello Grace, all<br><br></div>Thanks for the share and thanks to those that populated the responses as well. Just 1 minor comment/clarification; considering that .ARPA is for special purposes, one would expect that there are independent monitoring process that already exist so I was thinking it would be appropriate not to have it included in CSC/IFR processes.<br><br></div>It may be good to follow-up with IAB on this (unless one would assume they are reading this and as such are fine with it)<br><br></div>Regards<br><div><div><br><br></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Grace Abuhamad <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org" target="_blank">grace.abuhamad@icann.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:14px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><div>Dear all, </div><div><br></div><div>Following the call today, Marika and I have reviewed the responses to the ICG Questions and prepared a redline and clean version for your review. We received some text from Alan Greenberg for the RZM questions and some text from Donna Austin for the .ARPA/CSC question. To summarize our edits, please refer to the notes from the call:</div><div><br></div><div><b style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:10.5px"><i>3. ICG Questions - review of draft responses</i></b></div><div><ul><li><span style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px">ICG sent two batches of questions which are presented in the document on screen. CWG has already provided answers to questions. </span></li><li><span style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px">On RZM question #1: ICG misunderstood the NTIA/Versign proposal. </span></li><li><span style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px">On RZM question #2: we have a Standing Panel to approve substantial changes. So the answer includes, community consultation, expert consultation, and Board approval. Refer to paragraph 155 in the CWG Proposal (1155 in the ICG). <b>Alan Greenberg: </b>Proposed reply to Question 2: Both descriptions are correct but incomplete. The full answer is addressed in paragraph ICG 1155 (CWG 155). A change in the responsibilities of the IANA Functions Operator and the Root Zone Maintainer is clearly a substantial architectual and operational change, and is therefore subject to a review of the standing review committee and ultimately ICANN Board approval. Subsection 5 of paragraph 155/1155 requires consultation through an ICANN Public Comment Process.</span></li><li><span style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px">On ccTLD questions #3, #4, #5: These were drafted by the ccTLD members/participants. No comments or concerns. Thank you ccTLD members/participants. </span></li><li><span style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px">On PTI question #6: complete. no comments</span></li><li><span style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px">On PTI question #7: Clarify text referring to "Community Mechanism" since the CCWG-Accountability is currently working this out. Additional clarfications listed in action item. </span></li><li><span style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px">On PTI question #8: no comments other than cross-checking with implementation. </span></li><li><span style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px">On PTI question #9: PTI Board is responsible, but there is also recourse to the ICANN Board. Confirm with lawyers</span></li><li><span style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px">On questions #10, #11, #12 on scope: no comments</span></li><li><span style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px">On question #13: representative of IAB or appointed person will be involved in process. </span></li></ul><p style="margin:0px;font-size:10.5px;font-family:Helvetica;min-height:12px"><br></p><p style="margin:0px;font-size:10.5px;font-family:Helvetica"><b>Summary of current status on ICG questions</b></p><ul><li><span style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px">Further work needed on questions #1, #2, #7, #9, #13</span></li><li><span style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px">Provisionally closed questions: #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #10, #11, #12</span></li></ul><div><span style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px">ACTIONS</span></div><ul><li><span style="color:rgb(4,51,255);font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px"><b>Action</b>(staff): update Question #1 text on RZM with latest sent to list (by Alan)</span></li><li><span style="color:rgb(4,51,255);font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px"><b>Action</b>(staff): update question #2 per notes</span></li><li><span style="color:rgb(4,51,255);font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px"><b>Action</b>(staff): incorporate Christopher's input (and any other input received) where appropriate </span></li><li><span style="color:rgb(4,51,255);font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px"><b>Action</b>(staff): Clarify text referring to "Community Mechanism" (perhaps by capitalizing the word Mechanism to refer to structure and by making a direct reference to the CCWG-Accountability). Add "in the event that there is divergence between the Board and the Community on an IFR decision/recommendation, the Community will be able to rely on other mechanisms that are being developed by the CCWG."</span></li><li><span style="color:rgb(4,51,255);font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px"><b>Action</b>(staff): update question #9 to include recourse to ICANN Board. </span></li><li><span style="color:rgb(4,51,255);font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px"><b>Action</b>(Chairs): run updated answer to question #9 by the lawyers</span></li><li><span style="color:rgb(4,51,255);font-family:Helvetica;font-size:11px"><b>Action</b>(staff): staff to draft response to #13</span></li></ul></div><div><br></div><div>Best, </div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div>Grace</div></font></span></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><font color="#888888"><blockquote style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex;font-family:garamond,serif">
<i><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">Seun Ojedeji,<br style="color:rgb(0,102,0)"></span><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">Federal University Oye-Ekiti<br style="color:rgb(0,102,0)"></span><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">web: </span><a href="http://www.fuoye.edu.ng" target="_blank">http://www.fuoye.edu.ng</a><br>
<span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)"></span><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">Mobile: <a value="+2348035233535">+2348035233535</a></span><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)"></span><br></i><i><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">alt email:<a href="http://goog_1872880453" target="_blank"> </a><a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng" target="_blank">seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng</a></span></i><br><br><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!<br></blockquote></blockquote></font><br></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div>