<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>Dear All,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please find attached an updated version which includes the proposed addition to paragraph 113 as suggested by Sidley for question 6, the edit to question 13 as suggested by Chuck and noting that the response to question 1 is still under discussion (if
those that have been discussing this question on the list have a proposal to revise the draft response to reflect the feedback received, please share the proposed response with the list).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best regards,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Marika</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span><<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>> on behalf of Grace Abuhamad <<a href="mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org">grace.abuhamad@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Thursday 1 October 2015 18:13<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>"<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>[CWG-Stewardship] Responses to ICG Questions<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>Dear all, </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Following the call today, Marika and I have reviewed the responses to the ICG Questions and prepared a redline and clean version for your review. We received some text from Alan Greenberg for the RZM questions and some text from Donna Austin for the .ARPA/CSC
question. To summarize our edits, please refer to the notes from the call:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><b style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 10.5px;"><i>3. ICG Questions - review of draft responses</i></b></div>
<div>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;">ICG sent two batches of questions which are presented in the document on screen. CWG has already provided answers to questions. </span></li><li><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;">On RZM question #1: ICG misunderstood the NTIA/Versign proposal. </span></li><li><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;">On RZM question #2: we have a Standing Panel to approve substantial changes. So the answer includes, community consultation, expert consultation, and Board approval. Refer to paragraph 155 in the CWG
Proposal (1155 in the ICG). <b>Alan Greenberg: </b>Proposed reply to Question 2: Both descriptions are correct but incomplete. The full answer is addressed in paragraph ICG 1155 (CWG 155). A change in the responsibilities of the IANA Functions Operator and
the Root Zone Maintainer is clearly a substantial architectual and operational change, and is therefore subject to a review of the standing review committee and ultimately ICANN Board approval. Subsection 5 of paragraph 155/1155 requires consultation through
an ICANN Public Comment Process.</span></li><li><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;">On ccTLD questions #3, #4, #5: These were drafted by the ccTLD members/participants. No comments or concerns. Thank you ccTLD members/participants. </span></li><li><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;">On PTI question #6: complete. no comments</span></li><li><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;">On PTI question #7: Clarify text referring to "Community Mechanism" since the CCWG-Accountability is currently working this out. Additional clarfications listed in action item. </span></li><li><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;">On PTI question #8: no comments other than cross-checking with implementation. </span></li><li><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;">On PTI question #9: PTI Board is responsible, but there is also recourse to the ICANN Board. Confirm with lawyers</span></li><li><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;">On questions #10, #11, #12 on scope: no comments</span></li><li><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;">On question #13: representative of IAB or appointed person will be involved in process. </span></li></ul>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 10.5px; font-family: Helvetica; min-height: 12px;">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-size: 10.5px; font-family: Helvetica;"><b>Summary of current status on ICG questions</b></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;">Further work needed on questions #1, #2, #7, #9, #13</span></li><li><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;">Provisionally closed questions: #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #10, #11, #12</span></li></ul>
<div><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;">ACTIONS</span></div>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: rgb(4, 51, 255); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;"><b>Action</b>(staff): update Question #1 text on RZM with latest sent to list (by Alan)</span></li><li><span style="color: rgb(4, 51, 255); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;"><b>Action</b>(staff): update question #2 per notes</span></li><li><span style="color: rgb(4, 51, 255); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;"><b>Action</b>(staff): incorporate Christopher's input (and any other input received) where appropriate </span></li><li><span style="color: rgb(4, 51, 255); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;"><b>Action</b>(staff): Clarify text referring to "Community Mechanism" (perhaps by capitalizing the word Mechanism to refer to structure and by making a direct reference to the
CCWG-Accountability). Add "in the event that there is divergence between the Board and the Community on an IFR decision/recommendation, the Community will be able to rely on other mechanisms that are being developed by the CCWG."</span></li><li><span style="color: rgb(4, 51, 255); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;"><b>Action</b>(staff): update question #9 to include recourse to ICANN Board. </span></li><li><span style="color: rgb(4, 51, 255); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;"><b>Action</b>(Chairs): run updated answer to question #9 by the lawyers</span></li><li><span style="color: rgb(4, 51, 255); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 11px;"><b>Action</b>(staff): staff to draft response to #13</span></li></ul>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best, </div>
<div>Grace</div>
</div>
</div>
</span>
</body>
</html>