<div dir="ltr">I do support this proposal.<div><br></div><div>Thanks for being so attentive to these details.</div><div><br></div><div>-ed<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:13 PM Jonathan Robinson <<a href="mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info">jrobinson@afilias.info</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div lang="EN-IE" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div><p class="MsoNormal">All,<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">Lise and I today attended the session entitled:<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><a href="https://meetings.icann.org/en/marrakech55/schedule/mon-iana-stewardship-implementation" target="_blank">https://meetings.icann.org/en/marrakech55/schedule/mon-iana-stewardship-implementation</a><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">It became clear during the course of the session that material new details on the implementation of the CWG Stewardship proposal were being released for the first time.<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">This raises two issues:<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p><u></u><span>1.<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span><u></u>Process – How do we ensure that ICANN implementation staff do not get out of synchronisation with the CWG?<u></u><u></u></p><p><u></u><span>2.<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span><u></u>Substance – Do we agree with the details presented in the session today?<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">Both Lise and I stood up and made points to this effect during the meeting as did some of the CWG Stewardship Members / Participants.<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">We also spoke with Akram & Trang afterwards. It does seem that this was an inadvertent oversight driven by a desire and need to make progress.<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">However, it is also evident that there is a need for the ICANN staff implementation team to have more rapid or agile reference to the CWG, in addition to our bi-weekly updates / meetings.<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">Therefore, in order to address this need, the co-chairs propose to form an <b>implementation oversight task force</b> comprising the CWG co-chairs and the DT leads. The outcomes will come back to the CWG in any case but we believe that we need a capability to track the implementation work as closely as possible and as it evolves.<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">Please can we have any comments or concerns with this proposal as soon as possible.<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">Thank-you,<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">Lise and Jonathan<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">Co-Chairs, CWG Stewardship<u></u><u></u></p></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div></div>