<p dir="ltr">Sent from my LG G4<br>
Kindly excuse brevity and typos<br>
On 12 Apr 2016 15:50, "Maarten Simon" <<a href="mailto:maarten.simon@sidn.nl">maarten.simon@sidn.nl</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>. I further wonder if it wouldn’t be helpful to have a board liaison on the IFRT ?<br>
><br>
SO: +1 and I thought that was contemplated during the discussion (I think our proposal has such option as well). Nevertheless, while cautious about changing our proposal, I think a board liaison will be a good addition to IFRT.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Cheers!</p>
<p dir="ltr">> From: <<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>> on behalf of "Lindeberg, Elise" <<a href="mailto:elise.lindeberg@nkom.no">elise.lindeberg@nkom.no</a>><br>
> Date: Tuesday 12 April 2016 at 15:49<br>
> To: Greg Shatan <<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>>, Chuck Gomes <<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com">cgomes@verisign.com</a>><br>
> Cc: "<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>><br>
> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] IFRT Recommendations for Contract, SOW or CSC Charter Amendments<br>
><br>
> I agree with - if ICANN is a part of the contract anyway, let’s put a consultation right in predictable frame.<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> Elise<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> Fra: <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>] På vegne av Greg Shatan<br>
> Sendt: 12. april 2016 15:43<br>
> Til: Gomes, Chuck<br>
> Kopi: <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
> Emne: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] IFRT Recommendations for Contract, SOW or CSC Charter Amendments<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> If ICANN is a direct party to the contract, a consultation right seems appropriate. I expect they would find a way to make their concerns known with or without a formal consultation right, so it's probably better to define how that will happen. This can avoid unfortunately timed ad hoc interventions.<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> Greg <br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Gomes, Chuck <<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com">cgomes@verisign.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> I have two thoughts on this:<br>
><br>
> · Because PTI will be an affiliate of ICANN, would the consultation with PTI suffice?<br>
><br>
> · ICANN could comment during the public comment period.<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> That said, I don’t initially see any problems with a consultation with ICANN except that it might add more time to the process. Therefore, if it happens, I think it should happen in parallel with one of the other steps.<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> Chuck<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> <a href="mailto:From%3Acwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">From:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson<br>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 8:40 AM<br>
> To: <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] IFRT Recommendations for Contract, SOW or CSC Charter Amendments<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> All,<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> Please review below and provide any relevant input as soon as possible.<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> Jonathan<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> From: Flanagan, Sharon [mailto:<a href="mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com">sflanagan@sidley.com</a>] <br>
> Sent: 12 April 2016 02:33<br>
> To: Client Committee <<a href="mailto:cwg-client@icann.org">cwg-client@icann.org</a>><br>
> Subject: [client com] IFRT Recommendations for Contract, SOW or CSC Charter Amendments<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> Dear All,<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> There is an open question in the ICANN draft bylaws relating to IFRT-recommended amendments to the IANA Naming Function Contract, SOW and the CSC Charter (Section 18.6(a)(i)). ICANN had requested a consultation right on amendments to the Contract and SOW since it is a party to the Contract. On the CWG call, there was a comment on whether the consultation right for the ICANN board was appropriate. The CWG proposal does not contemplate an ICANN consultation right. <br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> Paragraph 272 of the CWG proposal states:<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> 272 The review could identify recommended amendments to the IANA SOW to address any performance deficiencies, or to the CSC charter to address any issues or deficiencies. The process of developing and approving amendments will take place through a defined process that includes, at minimum, the following steps, in advance of an amendment to either document being proposed:<br>
><br>
> › Consultation with the IANA Functions Operator;<br>
><br>
> › Consultation with the CSC;<br>
><br>
> › Public input session for ccTLD and gTLD operators; and<br>
><br>
> › Public comment period.<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> Best regards,<br>
><br>
> Sharon<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> SHARON R. FLANAGAN<br>
><br>
><br>
> SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP<br>
> 555 California Street<br>
> Suite 2000<br>
> San Francisco, CA 94104<br>
> +1 415 772 1271<br>
> <a href="mailto:sflanagan@sidley.com">sflanagan@sidley.com</a><br>
> <a href="http://www.sidley.com">www.sidley.com</a><br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> ****************************************************************************************************<br>
> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.<br>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us<br>
> immediately.<br>
><br>
> ****************************************************************************************************<br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
><br>
</p>