<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
p
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
        margin-right:0cm;
        mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
        margin-left:0cm;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
        margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-IE link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Seun,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>I’ll do what I can to answer the questions. As you say, others may have a view.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Please seen inline below.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Trust that’s helpful.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Jonathan<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com] <br><b>Sent:</b> 12 April 2016 06:47<br><b>To:</b> cwg-stewardship@icann.org<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA Bylaws Review Meeting | 11 April 2016<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p>Dear Co-Chairs,<o:p></o:p></p><p>Will be good to hear response to my questions (bearing in mind the update provided by Grace).<o:p></o:p></p><p>Regards<br>PS: Anyone who has a clear understanding may help as well.<o:p></o:p></p><p>Sent from my&nbsp;LG G4<br>Kindly excuse brevity and typos<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>On 11 Apr 2016 19:55, &quot;Seun Ojedeji&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<o:p></o:p></p><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm'><p>Sent from my&nbsp;LG G4<br>Kindly excuse brevity and typos<br>On 11 Apr 2016 6:39 p.m., &quot;Brenda Brewer&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:brenda.brewer@icann.org" target="_blank">brenda.brewer@icann.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br>&gt;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; ·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Question&nbsp;9:&nbsp;change&nbsp;to&nbsp;reflect&nbsp;confirmation&nbsp;of&nbsp;the&nbsp;question:&nbsp;CSC&nbsp;liaison&nbsp;is&nbsp;intended&nbsp;to&nbsp;come&nbsp;from&nbsp;RrSG&nbsp;or&nbsp;NCSG.&nbsp;Only&nbsp;restriction&nbsp;is&nbsp;<br>&gt; that&nbsp;this&nbsp;not&nbsp;be&nbsp;from&nbsp;a&nbsp;gTLD&nbsp;registry.&nbsp;<br>&gt;<br>SO: That there is still a &quot;or&quot; between NCSG and RrSG makes me wonder what this mean in practice; that NCSG will not appoint if RrSG appointed a liaison first or the other way round?<o:p></o:p></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>As per the proposal, Registries substantially determine the composition of the CSC. IMO, the purpose of Liaison is to provide others in the GNSO with opportunity to monitor and interact with CSC. Liaison therefore to come from GNSO but not from Registries (i.e. NCPH or RrSG)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p>Secondly, what's the use of a liaison since the DUO are components of the GNSO. I have not gone to the proposal to check if this is inline but it seem like an overkill to me.<o:p></o:p></p><p>&gt; ·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Question&nbsp;10:&nbsp;no&nbsp;change.&nbsp;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; ·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Question&nbsp;11:&nbsp;the&nbsp;&quot;it&nbsp;may&nbsp;be&nbsp;appropriate&quot;&nbsp;section&nbsp;can&nbsp;be&nbsp;placed&nbsp;in&nbsp;the&nbsp;Charter.&nbsp;It&nbsp;is&nbsp;not&nbsp;&nbsp;for&nbsp;inclusion&nbsp;in&nbsp;Bylaws.&nbsp;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; ·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Question&nbsp;12:&nbsp;no&nbsp;change.&nbsp;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; ·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Question&nbsp;13:&nbsp;We&nbsp;can&nbsp;keep&nbsp;the&nbsp;clarification&nbsp;and&nbsp;refer&nbsp;to&nbsp;the&nbsp;original&nbsp;text&nbsp;as&nbsp;inclusive&nbsp;of&nbsp;the&nbsp;broader&nbsp;community&nbsp;of&nbsp;'consumers'.&nbsp;<br>&gt;<br>SO: sounds more broadly inclusive and clear than the alternative.<o:p></o:p></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Agreed<o:p></o:p></span></p><p>Or&nbsp;an&nbsp;<br>&gt; alternative:&nbsp;direct&nbsp;customers&nbsp;of&nbsp;the&nbsp;naming&nbsp;services&quot;&nbsp;(text&nbsp;used&nbsp;for&nbsp;CSC).&nbsp;&nbsp;That&nbsp;text&nbsp;is&nbsp;as&nbsp;follows:&nbsp;&quot;Any&nbsp;necessary&nbsp;additions&nbsp;to&nbsp;the&nbsp;<br>&gt; IANA&nbsp;SOW&nbsp;to&nbsp;account&nbsp;for&nbsp;the&nbsp;needs&nbsp;of&nbsp;the&nbsp;consumers&nbsp;of&nbsp;the&nbsp;IANA&nbsp;naming&nbsp;functions&nbsp;[and/or]&nbsp;the&nbsp;ICANN&nbsp;community&nbsp;at&nbsp;large&quot;.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; Question&nbsp;22:&nbsp;no&nbsp;support&nbsp;for&nbsp;defining&nbsp;a&nbsp;simple&nbsp;majority.&nbsp;There&nbsp;is&nbsp;support&nbsp;for&nbsp;use&nbsp;of&nbsp;consensus.&nbsp;The&nbsp;CWG-Stewardship&nbsp;<br>&gt; proposal&nbsp;states&nbsp;that&nbsp;the&nbsp;SCWG&nbsp;would&nbsp;follow&nbsp;the&nbsp;stndards&nbsp;established&nbsp;by&nbsp;the&nbsp;CCWG-Principles.&nbsp;<br>&gt;<o:p></o:p></p><p>SO: Is this referring to the current CCWG framework open for PC or principles that will be set in the charter of each CCWG? If the former then fine(although I would note that having such mindset early would have been a good thing), however if it's the later I guess the high-level principles of the SCWG is indeed what we are discussing and I don't think it's something to be determined later.<o:p></o:p></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>CWG proposal (para. 391, p. 91) says:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>“The SCWG will follow the overall guidelines and procedures for ICANN Cross Community Working Groups.”<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>I read this to be such guidelines (for CWGs) that are in place or developed from time to time. Therefore I read this to be the (outcome) of the former i.e. the CCWG-Principles has draft guidelines currently out for public comment.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p>Regards<o:p></o:p></p><p>&gt; ·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Question&nbsp;24:&nbsp;no&nbsp;change<br>&gt;<br>&gt; ·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Other&nbsp;comments:&nbsp;Sharon&nbsp;has&nbsp;one&nbsp;question&nbsp;regaring&nbsp;18.4a.&nbsp;Will&nbsp;reach&nbsp;out&nbsp;to&nbsp;Avri&nbsp;and&nbsp;Matt&nbsp;to&nbsp;clarify.&nbsp;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; ·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Paul&nbsp;Kane&nbsp;noted&nbsp;concerns&nbsp;with&nbsp;consistency&nbsp;in&nbsp;Bylaws&nbsp;language&nbsp;and&nbsp;focus&nbsp;on&nbsp;gTLDs.&nbsp;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; Action&nbsp;(Sharon):&nbsp;Reach&nbsp;out&nbsp;to&nbsp;Avri&nbsp;and&nbsp;Matt&nbsp;with&nbsp;Client&nbsp;Committee&nbsp;in&nbsp;copy&nbsp;about&nbsp;language&nbsp;in&nbsp;18.4a.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; 2.&nbsp;AOB<br>&gt;<br>&gt; Next&nbsp;meeting&nbsp;(Thursday&nbsp;14&nbsp;April&nbsp;at&nbsp;16:00&nbsp;UTC).&nbsp;Group&nbsp;may&nbsp;not&nbsp;need&nbsp;a&nbsp;meeting&nbsp;on&nbsp;Thursday.&nbsp;&nbsp;The&nbsp;implementation&nbsp;update&nbsp;and&nbsp;other&nbsp;items&nbsp;<br>&gt; may&nbsp;be&nbsp;able&nbsp;to&nbsp;be&nbsp;provided&nbsp;via&nbsp;email.&nbsp;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; Action&nbsp;(Chairs):&nbsp;Due&nbsp;to&nbsp;time&nbsp;constraints&nbsp;on&nbsp;this&nbsp;call,&nbsp;Chairs&nbsp;will&nbsp;discuss&nbsp;and&nbsp;revert&nbsp;back&nbsp;to&nbsp;group&nbsp;with&nbsp;next&nbsp;steps.&nbsp;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; &nbsp;<br>&gt;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; _______________________________________________<br>&gt; CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>&gt; <a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>&gt; <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>&gt;<o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div></div></body></html>