<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>
<div>
<div>I think this is a leftover item from the initial ICANN staff drafting of PTI, which clarification that the IOTF made to the implementing ICANN staff on our first call and have resolved that as per the CWG proposal PTI will be managing all 3 functions.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-JG </div>
<div>
<div id="MAC_OUTLOOK_SIGNATURE"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:12pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span><<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>> on behalf of Christopher Wilkinson <<a href="mailto:lists@christopherwilkinson.eu">lists@christopherwilkinson.eu</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Saturday 23 April 2016 at 20:46<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>Seun Ojedeji <<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>"<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Clarification on PTI scope<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
Good catch, Seun.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>There is no doubt in my mind that PTI was defined as the successor to <u>all</u> the IANA functions.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Regards</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>CW</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div>On 23 Apr 2016, at 21:27, Seun Ojedeji <<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<blockquote type="cite">
<p dir="ltr">Dear all,</p>
<p dir="ltr">From my understanding of PTI was that it's going to be the new IANA that will serve the 3OCs (even though numbers and protocols contracts with ICANN).</p>
<p dir="ltr">If my high-level understanding above is right, then i think there may be something wrong in the fy17 draft budget which has just been brought to my attention.</p>
<p dir="ltr"><a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-opplan-budget-fy17-05mar16-en.pdf">https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-opplan-budget-fy17-05mar16-en.pdf</a></p>
<p dir="ltr">Page 25 item 4 says the following:</p>
<p dir="ltr">PTI- New legal entity, destined to host activities and costs of the IANA functions in service of
<br>
the *Names community*</p>
<p dir="ltr">Then page 27 seem to imply that PTI will indeed serve the names alone. At the moment, I have not considered the application of this new arrangement and unless I am missing something, I don't think this was what was proposed.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards<br>
Sent from my LG G4<br>
Kindly excuse brevity and typos</p>
_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</span>
</body>
</html>