<div dir="ltr"><div><font color="#1f497d" face="Calibri" size="3"><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">Jonathan,</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">Thank you very much for your comprehensive reply.</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">I can only reply to your kind message exactly as I
replied to Chuke.</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">An individual categorically objecting me and repeatedly referred to a certain country '<span> </span>law and <span> </span><span> </span>certain
country court s and referred to
past practices of that country and / or those <span> </span>courts of that country</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">This is not acceptable </font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">I do not know what we are doing here at all in this
process.</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">Let him brings whatever he decides as corresponding to
past practices ?????? and Court opinion ???? </font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">Why we ask the people to comment when no comment is accepted?<br>
We have been doing this works always with rush and rush.</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">We have been ignoring comments of participants .My
comments were openly and publicly ignored and rejected during several CWG
meetings in the name of time constrains.</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">It seems that some people <span> </span>wish to do the work among /between themselves
in a private manner and no one else is allowed to talk .If he talks he is told <span> </span>that his comments does not comply with past
practice nor <span> </span>is it compatible with
decision , opinion or order of certain courts</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">Everything seems to <span> </span>purely formalistic </font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">This is not an open, democratic, transparent, fair
button-up multistakeholder approach.</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">It is a dictated approach via past practices and court
opinion, practices of some particular country style</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">When i am told that the draft shall be considered as
final and definitive even if it is being sent for comments there is no
opportunity at all to make any <span> </span>farther comments
,what so ever, because our top high qualify man does speak for every body and
no comments is accepted is it not <span> </span>non democratic ?</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">With his sharp criticism he pushed me from commenting
by imposing his interoperation and his views <span> </span>of legal text on me.</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">I still does not understand what is the legal meaning
of “collectively and unanimously " as the term " unanimously also
includes collectively" </font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">Nor I am in agreement with «breaching repeatedly"
as breaching itself <span> </span>is breaching even if
not repeated it is breaching and contravene the agreement </font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">I also do not agree with the term <span> </span>“jointly and severally”.</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">I also disagree saying X will do an action as «will is
a deterministic verb and no one could guarantee that anyone else will something.
The proper term is shall (mandatory) or should (optional / quasi mandatory) </font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">There are many. Other parts that I have commented on </font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">What you all saying in the name of «time
constrain" that I must ignore all this and blindly agree with what you are
dictating me</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">You have decided to reject my comments </font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">You <span> </span>then need
to acknowledge that all comments that I have <span> </span>made are valid but due to time constrains you
are not able to take them into account nor discuss and analyses them</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">Best Regards</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-size:14pt"><font color="#000000">Kavouss </font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">
</font></font></div></div>