<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Sorry, wrong list.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Greg Shatan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Spoiler Alert: It's ICANN (in brackets) (i.e., [ICANN]). Along with a footnote.</div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Greg Shatan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I think the CWG contribution (limited to the names community signatory) will be available almost immediately after our call, which was supposed to end two minutes ago.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Greg</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div>On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Jari Arkko <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net" target="_blank">jari.arkko@piuha.net</a>></span> wrote:<br></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div>All,<br>
<br>
As an occasional member of this group, I wanted to voice my opinion that it is very important that these documents move forward to a public comment process today. We on the IETF Trust side have a similar situation in that we also need to be ready to send them forward for community review. Our meeting on that is about to start and I plan to do all I can to make that happen. (And that meeting is the only reason I am not joining your call, as our meetings run at the same time.)<br>
<br>
I also wanted to say that I agree with the process as outlined by Jonathan and am personally happy with the latest document versions.<br>
<br>
I also wanted to thank everyone who has been involved in the process, it has been quite intensive last few weeks. Thanks Greg for your hard work, the lawyers, Jonathan & Lise, and thank you Kavouss for joining the consensus and understanding how important this is. It is wonderful to see how everyone is working hard to do the right thing, as always. And getting it done!<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Jari<br>
<br>
<br></div></div>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/l<wbr>istinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>