<div dir="ltr"><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">Dear All </font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">The idea
that ICANN SIGN ON BEHALF OF Names Community was legally wrong</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">There must
be </font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><ol style="list-style-type:decimal;direction:ltr"><li style="font-style:normal;font-weight:normal"><p style="font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;margin-top:0cm;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-US">Names community establish an
unincorporated associated </span></p></li><li style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal"><p style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;margin-top:0cm;margin-bottom:0pt"><span lang="EN-US">That association could sign on
behalf names community or </span></p></li><li style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal"><p style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";font-size:11pt;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;margin-top:0cm;margin-bottom:10pt"><span lang="EN-US">That association e could delegate
its authority to a third legal entity to sign on its behalf</span></p></li></ol><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">You over
simplifying the matter and propose CUT & PASTE approach</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">If CWG on
its legal existence as established by its charter decides to request ICANN to sign
the Co-Chairs need to write a request the draft of which must be approved by
CWG first in a call and second on mailing list then sending that request to
ICANN and ICANN formally reply to that in writing.</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">That is the
process</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">NO CUT
& PASTE </font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">However,
the formulation that I proposed is a mid way between the two and has legal
validity</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">Regards</font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font><p style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">Kavouss </font></span></p><font color="#000000" face="Times New Roman" size="3">
</font></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-08-12 8:07 GMT+02:00 Kavouss Arasteh <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com" target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>What is wrong with my formulation </div><div>Yes CWG Client did that but CWG did not</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div>kavouss <br><br></div></font></span></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-08-12 7:49 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com" target="_blank">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid"><p dir="ltr">We made the request Kavous, I was even the one that raised the question and the request was sent to ICANN legal by the cwg client.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards</p>
<p dir="ltr">Sent from my LG G4<br>
Kindly excuse brevity and typos</p><div><div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 11 Aug 2016 10:49 p.m., "Kavouss Arasteh" <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com" target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid"><div dir="ltr"><div>Seun</div><div>YOU MISSED MY Argument</div><div>It is said At the request of CWG....</div><div>We have not MADE SUCH REQUEST BY cwg.</div><div>It was fabricated as such </div><div>I disagree with that</div><div>No formal request made to ICANN and no reply received from the Board </div><div>There was no Board's Member at the meeting and staff does not have such right to put in Our mouth a text .</div><div>I disagree </div><div>However, I proposed the following formulation .</div><div>At the request MADE AT CWG CALL ,,,.,,, ICANN .....</div><div>It means that the request is limited as being made at that call only </div><div>That does not change the substance but reflects the reality</div><div>Kavouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-08-11 23:35 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com" target="_blank">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid"><p dir="ltr">"...<b>ICANN</b><b> has indicated that it could serve as the counterparty to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community</b>..."</p>
<p dir="ltr">I did not stay all through the meeting so may have missed that part where ICANN confirmed this, It's good to know. FWIW, I believe Greg's text accurately captures the current status.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards</p>
<div class="gmail_quote"><div><div>On 11 Aug 2016 17:16, "Greg Shatan" <<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid"><div><div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">All, </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">As discussed, the following is the proposed footnote to accompany the inclusion of ICANN (in square brackets to indicate the non-final nature of that proposal) as the potential signatory to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">This will need to be finalized in the next 1-2 hours so that the documents can be put out for public comment today. No objections were heard on today's call. Any violent objections or genius revisions should be sent in reply to this email.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="verdana, sans-serif"><b>CWG-Stewardship is considering the appropriate entity to be the signatory to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community. At the request of the CWG-Stewardship, ICANN has indicated that it could serve as the counterparty to the Community Agreement on behalf of the Names Community and ICANN has been included in this draft. ICANN (or another counterparty) would be subject to process and criteria as determined by CWG-Stewardship.</b></font><br></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="verdana, sans-serif"><b><br></b></font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Greg</font></div></div>
<br></div></div><span>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/l<wbr>istinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
<br></span></blockquote></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/l<wbr>istinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>