[DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info.

[Bart Boswinkel]

Dear members of DT A
Please find included a reference, which may be useful in your deliberations
Kind regards,
Bart

From:  Elise Gerich <elise.gerich at icann.org>
Date:  Thursday 16 April 2015 17:02
To:  Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel at icann.org>, "dt1 at icann.org"
<dt1 at icann.org>
Cc:  Kim Davies <kim.davies at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: SLE Document with clarifying background info.

Bart,

Attached is a screen shot of the high level root zone process that if
incorporated into the contract by reference since it was in ICANN’s proposal
in response to the NTIA RFP.  The award and ICANN’s proposal are published
on NTIA’s website.
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/icann_volume_i_elecsub_part_
1_of_3.pdf

I provide this as information because the SLE document includes a high level
process flow chart, and this published process flow with the accompanying
step by step description in figure 1.2.39 of the published proposal may be
useful input for the committee.

Regards,
-- Elise 


From:  Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel at icann.org>
Date:  Thursday, April 16, 2015 at 12:23 AM
To:  "dt1 at icann.org" <dt1 at icann.org>
Cc:  Elise Gerich <elise.gerich at icann.org>, Kim Davies
<kim.davies at icann.org>
Subject:  FW: SLE Document with clarifying background info.

> Dear all,
> Please find included an email from Kim to DT A, which includes comments
> (see Kim¹s email)
> In case you have received Kim¹s email already, apologies for cross-posting.
> Kind regards,
> Bart
> 
> 
> On 16/04/15 02:09, "Kim Davies" <kim.davies at icann.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Paul, Hi all,
>> 
>> (I am not on the DT-A mailing list, so Bart/Bernie, if this submission is
>> not accepted please forward on if necessary)
>> 
>>>  Thanks for your time today.
>>>  
>>>  To ensure we are all discussing/making changes to the same document -
>>> please see
>>>  the attached link - all edits should only be to this document going
>>> forward.
>>>  
>>>  
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VMLsaL4z2OmnAsI6RFwbO0v2iE4YqJGSw4v53
>>> qtr_Lg/edit?usp=sharing
>>>  
>>>  Kim, we look forward to your constructive comments and rest assured we
>>> are very
>>>  willing to bring this to satisfactory conclusion asap.  We are fully
>>> aware the
>>>  SLE is being relied upon by other design teams within the CWG and needs
>>> to be
>>>  concluded before transition so we can all return to our day jobs. :-)
>> 
>> Please find attached a redlined version of the document I downloaded from
>> the above link. Most of them are comments, rather than edits, as
>> clarifications of the intent are needed before I think I could propose
>> useful text. I looked at it through a lens of implementability, plus
>> trying to view it through what I think was intended based on other
>> discussions on this topics I¹ve had with TLD managers over the years.
>> 
>> I hope this is helpful in surfacing some of the practical issues we may
>> face measuring along these criteria.
>> 
>> kim
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt1/attachments/20150416/00d67da2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5046 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt1/attachments/20150416/00d67da2/smime.p7s>