[DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info.

Paul M Kane - CWG paul.kane-cwg at icb.co.uk
Tue Apr 28 09:00:05 UTC 2015


Morning Elise

We are trying to finalise the Service Level Expectation document for the IANA
transition.  

Would you please provide the work-flow documents you current have so we can
capture what you are doing now and discuss with you which steps you consider are
to be removed as part of NTIA's withdrawal from the process.  

The balance of the IANA RZM work flow documents can follow and be discussed, later.

I understand that IANA RZM uses a ticketing system to initiate and receive
emails to Registry customers. Please ensure that technical resource are
available (as is standard industry practice) to enable IANA to automatically
monitor each transaction and collect statistics on its customers use of the
ticketing system.

Speak soon I hope

Best

Paul


Quoting Elise Gerich <elise.gerich at icann.org>:

> Hello Jay,
> 
> Paul¹s email requested ³access to all work-flow process documents² for the
> root zone management function.  Including sub-processes, there are quite a
> few work flow processes for the root zone function. We are reviewing all of
> them as per the request.
> 
> Let me assure you we are not creating new documentation in response to the
> request, and we are proceeding as fast as possible to fulfill the request.
> 
> Best regards,
> -- Elise 
> 
> 
> From:  Jay Daley <jay at nzrs.net.nz>
> Date:  Sunday, April 19, 2015 at 1:33 PM
> To:  "dt1 at icann.org" <dt1 at icann.org>
> Cc:  Kim Davies <kim.davies at icann.org>, Elise Gerich
> <elise.gerich at icann.org>
> Subject:  Re: [DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info.
> 
> > Morning all
> > 
> > i don¹t see much point in us having this call without the documentation
> from
> > IANA.  The screenshot of the process flow (thanks Elise) looks pretty much
> the
> > same as the process flow encoded in the expectations of the proposed SLA,
> so
> > we really need to see the more detailed process flow to understand the
> issues
> > Kim raised in the last call.
> > 
> > It sounds as if IANA are bundling a whole lot of things together to send
> us
> > when we would benefit from the process flow being sent as soon as possible
> > (since it must already exist, all it requires is NTIA permission).  The
> other
> > documents, currently being written, can come later.
> > 
> > If we do go ahead then I can make this time.  If we bring it forward an
> hour
> > then I can only join for 30 minutes (school run).
> > 
> > cheers
> > Jay
> > 
> >>  On 17/04/2015, at 9:16 pm, Patricio Poblete <patricio.poblete at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>  
> >>  Paul,
> >>  
> >>  I cannot join the call at this hour (6 pm)  in Chile,  but I could if it
> was
> >> one hour earlier.
> >>  
> >>  Patricio
> >>  P. S. Please announce also the UTC time
> >>  
> >>  On Apr 17, 2015 4:29 AM, "Paul M Kane - CWG" <paul.kane-cwg at icb.co.uk>
> >> wrote:
> >>  
> >>  To give ICANN legal more time to facilitate disclosure of the required
> info
> >> may
> >>  I suggest the time of next call is put back to Monday 20th
> >>  
> >>  This also gives us time to review our document
> >>  
> >>  To have as many participants involved in the call can I suggest
> >>  
> >>  Tuesday 9am Auckland time
> >>  Monday 10 pm London time
> >>  Monday 5pm EST New York
> >>  Monday 2 pm PST LA time
> >>  
> >>  I think the above is correct......
> >>  
> >>  Could everyone that is able to attend please confirm if this works for
> them
> >>  
> >>  Have a great w/end
> >>  
> >>  Best
> >>  
> >>  Paul
> >>  
> >>  Quoting Kim Davies <kim.davies at icann.org>:
> >>  
> >>>  > Hi Paul,
> >>>  >
> >>>>  > > Would you please ask ICANN legal to check that NTIA has been sent
> the
> >>>>  > > disclosure request for IANA Root Services.
> >>>  >
> >>>  > ICANN is still preparing the bundle of materials that is responsive
> to
> >>> your
> >>>  > request. Once it has completed the internal review process it will be
> >>> sent to
> >>>  > NTIA for their permission to disclose. As we noted on the call, ICANN
> is
> >>>  > doing this as quickly as possible ‹ not just for this Design Team but
> >>> others
> >>>  > that have asked for information ‹  but it is not an instantaneous
> >>> process.
> >>>  > The DIDP process is lead by ICANN¹s Legal department but they have
> asked
> us
> >>>  > in IANA for clarifications and help compiling the relevant internal
> >>>  > documentation.
> >>>  >
> >>>>  > > Can the SLE DT we have a call on Monday (20th) next week to run
> >>>> through
> >>>  > your
> >>>>  > > comments and all being well the flow charts to make sure the SLE
> is
> >>>  > complete.
> >>>>  > > What time (morning) works for you?
> >>>  >
> >>>  > At this stage, it looks like I can accommodate any reasonable time on
> >>>  > Monday.
> >>>  >
> >>>  > kim
> >>  
> >>  
> >>  
> >>  
> >>  
> >>  _______________________________________________
> >>  dt1 mailing list
> >>  dt1 at icann.org
> >>  https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt1
> >>  
> >>  _______________________________________________
> >>  dt1 mailing list
> >>  dt1 at icann.org
> >>  https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt1
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jay Daley
> > Chief Executive
> > NZRS Ltd
> > desk: +64 4 931 6977
> > mobile: +64 21 678840
> > linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/jaydaley
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 







More information about the dt1 mailing list