[SLE Team] Names SLEs follow-up call (DT-A only) | 08 Aug 16 | Meeting Notes
nathalie.vergnolle at icann.org
Mon Aug 8 23:00:56 UTC 2016
Please see below the meeting notes and chat history from today's Names SLEs follow-up call. The audio and AC room recordings are now posted at https://www.icann.org/stewardship-implementation under "Meetings & Work Sessions" section.
*** Meeting Notes ***
Names SLEs follow-up Call (DT-A)
Monday 08 August @ 20:00 UTC
Please note that this call will be recorded.
To mute or unmute your phone, press *6 (star 6).
Group reviewed SLAs.
Time for lodgment of change request into RZMS by ICANN staff on behalf of request sent by email - Cat I, II, III, IV, V : ≤ 3 days (95%) agreed to.
Cat II: There are no tech checks performed, and no root zone changes for this category. This is why several SLAs are n/a for this category (Tech check following submission, subsequent tech check, Suppl Tech checks, Time to publish changes are n/a)
Cat IV - Time for 3rd party review: Group suggests 60 days, with no breach condition ("intentionally left blank"). To be further reviewed by the CSC.
All participants present approve the document as presented and discussed.
ACTION: Staff to finalize document with discussed elements.
ACTION: Paul to reach out to other DT-A participants to obtain approval.
ACTION: present document to CWG on Aug 11
Nathalie Vergnolle: Hi everyone!
Elaine Pruis: Hi Nathalie
Jeffrey Eckhaus: hello . i am on but do not hear anything . has the call begun?
Patricio Poblete: Hi everyone!
Jeffrey Eckhaus: hi. heard you . thanks
Jeffrey Eckhaus: was worried I had a bad connection
Nathalie Vergnolle: Waiting for Paul to get started
Nathalie Vergnolle: Participants have scrolling rights on the document being shared.
Jay Daley: Thanks. Just spent two minutes trying to work out what was wrong with my headset!
Kim Davies: It is in the Excel spreadsheet
elise: Kim, is it correct to say that when the table calls out "technical checks", the table was describing the suite of technical checks for changes in the root zone?
Kim Davies: @elise: correct
elise: glad it is now marked as not applicable
Trang Nguyen: It's page 20
Trang Nguyen: We just finished discussions on page 19
Jay Daley: What page are we on?
Trang Nguyen: We are on page 22
elise: cannot hear Jay
Jeffrey Eckhaus: it is a little low
elise: better now, thank you
elise: sorry, but I could not hear the beginning of your comment, Jay
Jay Daley: Rather than empty can they please say "intentionally left blank"
Jay Daley: I agree
Jay Daley: Has Jeffrey dropped out?
Elaine Pruis: Thanks everyone
elise: thank you all - bye
Kim Davies: cheers
Direct line: +1-310-578-8957
Jabber: nathalie.vergnolle at jabber.icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dt1