<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Kim Davies <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kim.davies@icann.org" target="_blank">kim.davies@icann.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div>If IANA performs within the community agreed SLEs,
and the SLEs cover IANA’s processing time, where is the concerning opportunity for IANA to unduly detriment a request?</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It is reassuring to read that the intention is that the SLE's cover [all of] IANA's processing time. If this is so, there should be no basis for discrepancy, and the fear that somehow some significant amount of time could go unaccounted for would have been unfounded.</div><div><br></div><div>I join Paul in encouraging Kim, Bernie and Adam to keep up the good work for a final push to get to the finish line.</div><div><br></div><div>Patricio </div></div></div></div>