[DTC CSC] DT - C Draft Recommendations document

[Donna Austin]

Hi Grace

Please find attached the DT-3 document for circulation. Sorry for the delay.

Do I need to circulate this to the CWG?

Thanks

Donna

From: Grace Abuhamad [mailto:grace.abuhamad at icann.org]
Sent: Saturday, 11 April 2015 8:30 AM
To: Donna Austin; dt3 at icann.org
Subject: Re: [DTC CSC] CSC Charter 0 7

Hi Donna and all,

Will you submit your document to the CWG today? I'll be sending out the reading list in an hour and would like to include DT-C if possible.

Thanks,
Grace

From: Donna Austin <Donna.Austin at ariservices.com<mailto:Donna.Austin at ariservices.com>>
Date: Friday, April 10, 2015 at 4:31 PM
To: "dt3 at icann.org<mailto:dt3 at icann.org>" <dt3 at icann.org<mailto:dt3 at icann.org>>
Subject: [DTC CSC] CSC Charter 0 7

All

I think I've captured the changes suggested from the call this morning.

On the big issue of 'technological changes' I've flagged that the Design Team has concerns about the CSC being responsible for anything other than monitoring. I've also provided some new text to try to overcome that concern, which I'm repeating here for ease of reference. I'm happy to take this out and just leave what we had and express our concerns if others do not think this is a viable option in that it does not overcome our primary concern.

The CSC, in consultation with registry operators, is authorised to discuss with the IANA Functions Operator ways to enhance the provision of IANA's operational services to meet changing technological environments; as a means to address performance issues; or other unforeseen circumstances. In the event it is agreed that a material change in IANA functions services or operations would be beneficial, the CSC reserves the right to call for a community consultation and independent validation, to be convened by IANA, on the proposed change. Any recommended change must be approved by the ccNSO and RySG.

The IANA Functions Operator would be responsible for implementing any recommended changes and must ensure that sufficient testing is undertaken to ensure smooth transition and no disruption to service levels.

I'm conscious that we need to wrap this up today and get to the CWG, but it would be useful if we could defer until such time as Staffan and Martin have had a chance to review.

Thanks

Donna

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt3/attachments/20150411/4a9d5ef9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DT C - Draft - Recommendation.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 25579 bytes
Desc: DT C - Draft - Recommendation.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt3/attachments/20150411/4a9d5ef9/DTC-Draft-Recommendation-0001.docx>