[DTC CSC] CWG - Public Comment Review Tool - Action Items - 26 May 2015 CSC

[Donna Austin]

Hi All

Attached are proposed responses to comments received on the CSC. I apologies for the delay in getting this done, but it was unavoidable.

Martin and Staffan, thanks for your contributions. While it may not be obvious from the content, I can assure you they were very helpful in developing responses.

We need to come to an agreement on whether the CSC would escalate unresolved performance issues to the ccNSO and GNSO (as stated in the proposal) or the ccNSO and RySG (see the attached email). I thought I was in favour of ccNSO and RySG, but DT-M has some good arguments about why ccNSO and GNSO is the way to go.

Marika, I'll take another look at the Charter in light of these comments.

Thanks

Donna

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt3/attachments/20150603/de057434/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CWG - Public Comment Review Tool - Action Items - 26 May 2015 CSC.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 51542 bytes
Desc: CWG - Public Comment Review Tool - Action Items - 26 May 2015 CSC.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt3/attachments/20150603/de057434/CWG-PublicCommentReviewTool-ActionItems-26May2015CSC-0001.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
Subject: Re: For your review - proposed public comment responses
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 08:13:54 +0000
Size: 32359
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt3/attachments/20150603/de057434/attachment-0001.mht>