<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<p align="LEFT"><b style="font-size: 16px;">Notes DT C call 23 March 2015</b></p>
<div>1. Roll call</div>
<div>All except Sarah at the call</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<b style="font-size: 18px;">Discussion Overview Document</b>
<div><b><span style="font-size: 16px;">Overview section</span><br align="LEFT">
</b>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Section&nbsp;1.&nbsp;Agreed</b></p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT"><b>Section&nbsp;2.&nbsp;New&nbsp;section.&nbsp;Agreed</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Section&nbsp;3.&nbsp;Agreed</b></p>
<p align="LEFT">Ensure&nbsp;int&nbsp;eh&nbsp;charter&nbsp;that&nbsp;the&nbsp;CSC&nbsp;is&nbsp;mandated&nbsp;to&nbsp;decvvelop&nbsp;it&nbsp;s&nbsp;own&nbsp;working&nbsp;methods&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Section&nbsp;4.&nbsp;Agreed</b></p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT"><b>Section&nbsp;5.&nbsp;</b></p>
<p align="LEFT">Suggestion:&nbsp;CSCS&nbsp;and&nbsp;NTIA&nbsp;run&nbsp;in&nbsp;parrallel&nbsp;for&nbsp;a&nbsp;while.&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">Hand-over&nbsp;responsibilties&nbsp;of&nbsp;operational&nbsp;oversight&nbsp;role&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">If&nbsp;reporting&nbsp;is&nbsp;different,&nbsp;the&nbsp;reporting&nbsp;would&nbsp;be&nbsp;burdensome.&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">Face&nbsp;in&nbsp;approach,&nbsp;to&nbsp;avoid&nbsp;smooth&nbsp;transition.</p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT"><b>Agreed&nbsp;but&nbsp;need to take into&nbsp;consideration&nbsp;issues&nbsp;identified&nbsp;above</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Section&nbsp;6:</b>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">Martin&nbsp;comment:&nbsp;avoid&nbsp;to&nbsp;be&nbsp;unduly&nbsp;prescriptive</p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Suggestion:&nbsp;6,&nbsp;7,&nbsp;8&nbsp;and&nbsp;9&nbsp;are&nbsp;linked&nbsp;/&nbsp;should&nbsp;be&nbsp;clustered&nbsp;with&nbsp;section&nbsp;1</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Action renumber section&nbsp;</b></p>
<p align="LEFT">Kim:&nbsp;In&nbsp;which&nbsp;circumstances,&nbsp;should&nbsp;you&nbsp;endevour&nbsp;to&nbsp;change.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Martin:&nbsp;leave&nbsp;the&nbsp;world&nbsp;&quot;will&quot;&nbsp;in.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Kurt:&nbsp;Grouping&nbsp;them&nbsp;together&nbsp;supported</p>
<p align="LEFT">Include&nbsp;word&nbsp;usually&nbsp;-&gt;&nbsp;shall</p>
<p align="LEFT">Other&nbsp;groups&nbsp;will&nbsp;be&nbsp;talking&nbsp;about&nbsp;escalation.&nbsp;At&nbsp;the&nbsp;same&nbsp;time&nbsp;core&nbsp;is&nbsp;cooperation&nbsp;between&nbsp;IANA and&nbsp;CSC.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Donna:&nbsp;reference&nbsp;to&nbsp;escalation&nbsp;is&nbsp;included&nbsp;in&nbsp;section&nbsp;10.</p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT">Martin:&nbsp;At&nbsp;the&nbsp;end&nbsp;of&nbsp;cooperative&nbsp;process,&nbsp;and&nbsp;only&nbsp;if&nbsp;this&nbsp;fails,&nbsp;escalation&nbsp;process&nbsp;will&nbsp;be&nbsp;pursued.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Proposal &nbsp;is to&nbsp;sperate&nbsp;it.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Staffan:&nbsp;DT&nbsp;M&nbsp;proposal,&nbsp;quite&nbsp;detailed&nbsp;proposal&nbsp;on&nbsp;escalation&nbsp;process.&nbsp;</p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT"><b>Donna:&nbsp;need&nbsp;to&nbsp;find&nbsp;middle&nbsp;ground</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b><br>
</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Section&nbsp;7:&nbsp;Agreed</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Section&nbsp;8:&nbsp;Agreed</b></p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT"><b>Section&nbsp;9:&nbsp;new.</b></p>
<p align="LEFT">Staffan:&nbsp;do&nbsp;we&nbsp;need&nbsp;to&nbsp;decide&nbsp;it&nbsp;should&nbsp;be&nbsp;&quot;annually&quot;?</p>
<p align="LEFT">Donna:&nbsp;to&nbsp;have&nbsp;a&nbsp;regular&nbsp;meeting</p>
<p align="LEFT">Stephanie:&nbsp;Annual&nbsp;is&nbsp;incuded&nbsp;to&nbsp;distinguish&nbsp;from&nbsp;4.&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">Kurt&nbsp;porposal:&nbsp;The&nbsp;CSC&nbsp;shall&nbsp;hold&nbsp;a&nbsp;formal&nbsp;regular&nbsp;(at&nbsp;least&nbsp;annual)&nbsp;meeting.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Action update language&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">Martin: The&nbsp;CSC&nbsp;shall&nbsp;hold&nbsp;a&nbsp;formal&nbsp;regular&nbsp;(typically&nbsp;annualy)&nbsp;meeting..</p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT">Kurt&nbsp;suggestion&nbsp;adopted</p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>T</b><b>he&nbsp;CSC&nbsp;shall&nbsp;hold&nbsp;a&nbsp;formal&nbsp;regular&nbsp;(at&nbsp;least&nbsp;annual)&nbsp;meeting.</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Action update language&nbsp;</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b><br>
</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Section&nbsp;10:&nbsp;</b></p>
<p align="LEFT">Donna:&nbsp;the&nbsp;reason&nbsp;to&nbsp;move&nbsp;away&nbsp;from&nbsp;escalation,&nbsp;the&nbsp;word&nbsp;&quot;esclation&quot;&nbsp;comes&nbsp;with&nbsp;baggage.&nbsp;&nbsp;At&nbsp;the&nbsp;same&nbsp;time&nbsp;needs&nbsp;to&nbsp;be&nbsp;adressed.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Martin:&nbsp;Will&nbsp;propose&nbsp;some&nbsp;language</p>
<p align="LEFT">10&nbsp;bis&nbsp;or&nbsp;11&nbsp;bis&nbsp;could&nbsp;read&nbsp;&quot;should&nbsp;resolution&nbsp;processes&nbsp;not&nbsp;remedy&nbsp;failings&nbsp;in&nbsp;the&nbsp;provision&nbsp;of&nbsp;the&nbsp;IANA&nbsp;functions&nbsp;service,&nbsp;CSC&nbsp;can&nbsp;escalate&nbsp;the&nbsp;issue&nbsp;in&nbsp;the&nbsp;process&nbsp;identified&nbsp;bt&nbsp;DT-M</p>
<p align="LEFT">Donna:&nbsp;CWG&nbsp;is&nbsp;used&nbsp;to&nbsp;the&nbsp;world&nbsp;&quot;escalation&quot;</p>
<p align="LEFT">Martin:&nbsp;concern&nbsp;is&nbsp;that&nbsp;&quot;escaltion&quot;&nbsp;goes&nbsp;out&nbsp;of&nbsp;CSC.&nbsp;Remedial&nbsp;action&nbsp;should&nbsp;stay&nbsp;within&nbsp;the&nbsp;CSC.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Staffan:&nbsp;CSC&nbsp;is&nbsp;initial&nbsp;point&nbsp;of&nbsp;escalation.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Donna:&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">1.&nbsp;direct&nbsp;customer&nbsp;can&nbsp;come&nbsp;to&nbsp;CSC</p>
<p align="LEFT">2.&nbsp;Overall&nbsp;management&nbsp;of&nbsp;the&nbsp;IANA,&nbsp;based&nbsp;on&nbsp;reporting.&nbsp;These&nbsp;two&nbsp;remedial&nbsp;should&nbsp;be&nbsp;clearly&nbsp;distinguished.</p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT">Individual&nbsp;TLD&nbsp;could&nbsp;seek&nbsp;remedial&nbsp;assitance&nbsp;from&nbsp;CSC,&nbsp;which&nbsp;is&nbsp;dealt&nbsp;with&nbsp;in&nbsp;Section&nbsp;11</p>
<p align="LEFT">Donna:&nbsp;Revisit&nbsp;section&nbsp;10&nbsp;and&nbsp;11,&nbsp;following&nbsp;conversation&nbsp;with&nbsp;DT&nbsp;M</p>
<b>Action:&nbsp;Revisit&nbsp;section&nbsp;10&nbsp;and&nbsp;11,&nbsp;following&nbsp;conversation&nbsp;with&nbsp;DT&nbsp;M</b><br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT"><b><br>
</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Section&nbsp;12.</b></p>
<p align="LEFT">Financial&nbsp;issue</p>
<p align="LEFT">Concern&nbsp;raised,&nbsp;some&nbsp;stakeholder&nbsp;group&nbsp;want&nbsp;to&nbsp;participate&nbsp;in&nbsp;CSC.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Stephanie:&nbsp;need&nbsp;for&nbsp;a&nbsp;narrow.&nbsp;At&nbsp;the&nbsp;same&nbsp;time&nbsp;it&nbsp;will&nbsp;be&nbsp;contentious&nbsp;also&nbsp;in&nbsp;context&nbsp;of&nbsp;discussion&nbsp;around&nbsp;MRT</p>
<p align="LEFT">Staffan:&nbsp;suggest&nbsp;to&nbsp;include&nbsp;two&nbsp;alternatives,&nbsp;to&nbsp;choose&nbsp;for&nbsp;consideration&nbsp;by&nbsp;the&nbsp;CWG</p>
<p align="LEFT">Martin:&nbsp;If&nbsp;CSC&nbsp;is&nbsp;doing&nbsp;its&nbsp;job&nbsp;well,&nbsp;it&nbsp;wil&nbsp;be&nbsp;boring.&nbsp;Having&nbsp;liaisons&nbsp;will&nbsp;be&nbsp;unnessary&nbsp;under&nbsp;these&nbsp;circumstances.&nbsp;Not&nbsp;mention&nbsp;the&nbsp;origin&nbsp;of&nbsp;liaisons.&nbsp;The&nbsp;liaisons&nbsp;from&nbsp;other&nbsp;ICANN&nbsp;groups,&nbsp;who&nbsp;should&nbsp;keep&nbsp;their&nbsp;group&nbsp;informed.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Donna:&nbsp;Include&nbsp;qualifications:&nbsp;should&nbsp;be&nbsp;kept&nbsp;small,&nbsp;and&nbsp;people&nbsp;on&nbsp;CSC&nbsp;should&nbsp;be&nbsp;qualified</p>
<p align="LEFT">Stephanie: &nbsp;Differentiating&nbsp;between&nbsp;members&nbsp;and&nbsp;liaisons&nbsp;gives&nbsp;us&nbsp;some&nbsp;flexibility&nbsp;to&nbsp;define&nbsp;the&nbsp;roles&nbsp;(as&nbsp;martin&nbsp;is&nbsp;suggesting)&nbsp;when&nbsp;we&nbsp;have&nbsp;a&nbsp;sense&nbsp;of&nbsp;what&nbsp;kind&nbsp;of&nbsp;participation&nbsp;other&nbsp;groups&nbsp;are&nbsp;seeking</p>
<p align="LEFT">Strike&nbsp;the&nbsp;number&nbsp;and&nbsp;include&nbsp;reference&nbsp;to&nbsp;liaisons&nbsp;with&nbsp;description&nbsp;of&nbsp;role.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Martin:&nbsp;issue&nbsp;around&nbsp;&quot;expert&quot;&nbsp;.&nbsp;Suggestion&nbsp;CSC:&nbsp;CSC&nbsp;could&nbsp;seek&nbsp;&quot;expert&nbsp;advisors&quot;.&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">Staffan:&nbsp;Frankfurt take&nbsp;away was the&nbsp;sense&nbsp;of&nbsp;capture,&nbsp;by&nbsp;including&nbsp;multi-stakehoderism.&nbsp;at&nbsp;othe&nbsp;level.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Suggestion&nbsp;Kim:&nbsp;IANA&nbsp;liaison&nbsp;to&nbsp;CSC.&nbsp;AS&nbsp;part&nbsp;of&nbsp;reporting&nbsp;function&nbsp;need&nbsp;for&nbsp;IANA&nbsp;to&nbsp;have&nbsp;a&nbsp;seat&nbsp;at&nbsp;the&nbsp;table.&nbsp;as&nbsp;non-voting&nbsp;participant.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Staffan:&nbsp;supports&nbsp;idea.&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">Martin:&nbsp;more&nbsp;then&nbsp;support.&nbsp;If&nbsp;there&nbsp;issues,&nbsp;this&nbsp;person&nbsp;would&nbsp;be&nbsp;able&nbsp;to&nbsp;explain&nbsp;to&nbsp;what&nbsp;and&nbsp;why</p>
<p align="LEFT">Stephanie:&nbsp;not&nbsp;opposed.&nbsp;The&nbsp;CSC&nbsp;will&nbsp;be&nbsp;interacting&nbsp;but&nbsp;to&nbsp;have&nbsp;one&nbsp;at&nbsp;the&nbsp;table&nbsp;.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Donna:&nbsp;Steve&nbsp;C&nbsp;suggedsted&nbsp;that&nbsp;RSSAC&nbsp;represent&nbsp;direct&nbsp;customers&nbsp;of&nbsp;naming&nbsp;function.&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">Staffan:&nbsp;include&nbsp;as&nbsp;liaison</p>
<p align="LEFT">Martin:&nbsp;Root&nbsp;server&nbsp;operators,&nbsp;special&nbsp;role,&nbsp;and&nbsp;as&nbsp;such&nbsp;should&nbsp;be&nbsp;part&nbsp;of&nbsp;CSC.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Kurt:&nbsp;Question&nbsp;whether&nbsp;laisiosn&nbsp;or&nbsp;member?&nbsp;they&nbsp;can&nbsp;always&nbsp;be&nbsp;elevated.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Kim:&nbsp;rare&nbsp;direct&nbsp;interaction.&nbsp;At&nbsp;the&nbsp;same&nbsp;time&nbsp;high&nbsp;interest,&nbsp;in&nbsp;the&nbsp;Root&nbsp;zone.&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">Donna:&nbsp;minimum&nbsp;of&nbsp;2&nbsp;ccTLD&nbsp;and&nbsp;2&nbsp;gTLDs,&nbsp;and&nbsp;liaisons&nbsp;from&nbsp;other&nbsp;groups&nbsp;and&nbsp;1&nbsp;IANA&nbsp;liaison.&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Fundamental&nbsp;principles</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Should&nbsp;be&nbsp;kept&nbsp;small&nbsp;and&nbsp;members&nbsp;should&nbsp;have&nbsp;relevant&nbsp;expertice</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Two&nbsp;options:</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>1.&nbsp;TLDs&nbsp;(&nbsp;cc&nbsp;and&nbsp;g)&nbsp;&#43;&nbsp;RSSAC&nbsp;Liaisosn&nbsp;&#43;&nbsp;1&nbsp;IANA&nbsp;Liaison</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>2.&nbsp;As&nbsp;1,&nbsp;&#43;&nbsp;other&nbsp;liaisons</b></p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT"><b>Section&nbsp;13</b></p>
<p align="LEFT">Staffan:&nbsp;Sounds&nbsp;reasonable.&nbsp;Original&nbsp;with&nbsp;MRT,&nbsp;but&nbsp;now&nbsp;back&nbsp;with&nbsp;CSC</p>
<p align="LEFT">Relaetd&nbsp;to&nbsp;change&nbsp;on&nbsp;how&nbsp;IANA&nbsp;does&nbsp;its&nbsp;business</p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT">Kurt:&nbsp;Endgame&nbsp;in&nbsp;escaltion&nbsp;process.&nbsp;Depends&nbsp;on composition</p>
<p align="LEFT">Martin:&nbsp;section&nbsp;13&nbsp;reflects&nbsp;outward&nbsp;facing&nbsp;aspects&nbsp;of&nbsp;the&nbsp;CSC.&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">Need&nbsp;to&nbsp;go&nbsp;out&nbsp;with&nbsp;proposals&nbsp;if&nbsp;changes.</p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT">Stephanie:&nbsp;13&nbsp;should&nbsp;include&nbsp;a&nbsp;change&nbsp;to&nbsp;how&nbsp;IANA&nbsp;does&nbsp;its&nbsp;business&nbsp;OR&nbsp;to&nbsp;how&nbsp;the&nbsp;CSC&nbsp;does&nbsp;its&nbsp;business</p>
<p align="LEFT">Review&nbsp;language&nbsp;to&nbsp;ensure&nbsp;it&nbsp;is&nbsp;about&nbsp;day-to&nbsp;dat business</p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Action Strike&nbsp;affect&nbsp;oversight&nbsp;of&nbsp;the&nbsp;IANA&nbsp;Naming&nbsp;Functions.</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>and&nbsp;replace with Stephanies&nbsp;suggestions:&nbsp;&nbsp;a&nbsp;change&nbsp;to&nbsp;how&nbsp;IANA&nbsp;does&nbsp;its&nbsp;business&nbsp;OR&nbsp;to&nbsp;how&nbsp;the&nbsp;CSC&nbsp;does&nbsp;its&nbsp;business</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><br>
</p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Section&nbsp;14</b></p>
<p align="LEFT">Donna:</p>
<p align="LEFT">14&nbsp;&nbsp;is&nbsp;about&nbsp;escalation&nbsp;and&nbsp;step&nbsp;in&nbsp;separability,&nbsp;not&nbsp;mandated&nbsp;to&nbsp;make&nbsp;such&nbsp;a&nbsp;change.&nbsp;</p>
<div><br>
</div>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Add, change to: &nbsp; remediation&nbsp;/escalation&nbsp;process&nbsp;</b></p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT"><span style="font-size: 16px;"><b>Dependencies section of Document</b></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Action Add&nbsp;dependency&nbsp;relating&nbsp;to&nbsp;DT&nbsp;M&nbsp;(Escalation)</b></p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT">Kim:&nbsp;IDN&nbsp;repository&nbsp;is&nbsp;not&nbsp;contracted,&nbsp;but&nbsp;falls&nbsp;under&nbsp;responsibility&nbsp;of&nbsp;IANA&nbsp;department.&nbsp;Other&nbsp;example:&nbsp;List&nbsp;of&nbsp;accredited&nbsp;registrars&nbsp;(also&nbsp;maintained&nbsp;by&nbsp;IANA&nbsp;department)</p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT">Martin:&nbsp;Management&nbsp;of&nbsp;.INT&nbsp;similar&nbsp;to&nbsp;other&nbsp;functions.&nbsp;If&nbsp;considered&nbsp;to&nbsp;be&nbsp;part&nbsp;of&nbsp;role&nbsp;of&nbsp;CSC,&nbsp;customers&nbsp;of&nbsp;INT&nbsp;should&nbsp;also&nbsp;be&nbsp;aprt&nbsp;of&nbsp;CSC</p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT">Kim:&nbsp;Majority&nbsp;of&nbsp;customer&nbsp;Intenrational&nbsp;org.&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">From&nbsp;general&nbsp;perspective.&nbsp;it&nbsp;is&nbsp;considered&nbsp;part&nbsp;of&nbsp;naming&nbsp;function</p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Keep reference&nbsp;to&nbsp;.INT in.</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Keep&nbsp;in&nbsp;reference&nbsp;to&nbsp;IDN&nbsp;repository&nbsp;as&nbsp;placeholder&nbsp;</b></p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT"><b style="font-size: 16px;">Discussion&nbsp;on&nbsp;Table</b></p>
<p align="LEFT">Take&nbsp;out&nbsp;column&nbsp;CSC&nbsp;Perform</p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT"><b>Row&nbsp;3.4&nbsp;Security&nbsp;Plan</b></p>
<p align="LEFT">Kim:&nbsp;if&nbsp;security&nbsp;,&nbsp;not&nbsp;to&nbsp;made&nbsp;public.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Martin:&nbsp;Okay&nbsp;with&nbsp;KIm's&nbsp;suggestion.&nbsp;Supports&nbsp;concept&nbsp;of&nbsp;3rd&nbsp;party&nbsp;auditor,&nbsp;to&nbsp;show&nbsp;it&nbsp;has&nbsp;been&nbsp;gone&nbsp;through.&nbsp;</p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT"><b>See&nbsp;comment&nbsp;Kim, to be included</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Row&nbsp;4.6:</b>&nbsp;leave&nbsp;it&nbsp;in&nbsp;but&nbsp;recognise&nbsp;it&nbsp;is&nbsp;deliverable&nbsp;at&nbsp;he&nbsp;end&nbsp;of&nbsp;contract.&nbsp;Left in&nbsp;to&nbsp;acknowledged&nbsp;it&nbsp;has&nbsp;been&nbsp;looked&nbsp;at.</p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Row&nbsp;7.2</b>:&nbsp;suggestion&nbsp;to&nbsp;include&nbsp;langauge&nbsp;that&nbsp;it&nbsp;is&nbsp;being&nbsp;done.</p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT"><b>Strawman section</b>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">Kurt&nbsp;suggest&nbsp;to&nbsp;include&nbsp;principles.&nbsp;Need&nbsp;to&nbsp;adjust&nbsp;and&nbsp;evolve&nbsp;over&nbsp;time.&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">Martin:&nbsp;DT&nbsp;M&nbsp;and&nbsp;remedial&nbsp;action&nbsp;are&nbsp;not&nbsp;parallel&nbsp;but&nbsp;differnt&nbsp;processes.</p>
<p align="LEFT">If&nbsp;reemdial&nbsp;process&nbsp;failes,&nbsp;the&nbsp;escalation&nbsp;process&nbsp;kicks&nbsp;in.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Question:&nbsp;whether&nbsp;the&nbsp;level&nbsp;of&nbsp;detail&nbsp;as&nbsp;in&nbsp;strawman&nbsp;is&nbsp;needed&nbsp;in&nbsp;this&nbsp;document.&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">If&nbsp;Remedial&nbsp;action&nbsp;does&nbsp;not&nbsp;resolve&nbsp;then&nbsp;next&nbsp;step.</p>
<p align="LEFT">Donna:&nbsp;let's&nbsp;leave&nbsp;in&nbsp;,&nbsp;understanding&nbsp;that&nbsp;level&nbsp;of&nbsp;detail&nbsp;wil&nbsp;be&nbsp;challenged.&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">Process&nbsp;to&nbsp;make&nbsp;complaints</p>
<p align="LEFT">Donna&nbsp;for&nbsp;individual&nbsp;cases&nbsp;keep&nbsp;information&nbsp;confidential</p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT">Kim:&nbsp;in&nbsp;some&nbsp;cases&nbsp;information&nbsp;needs&nbsp;to&nbsp;be&nbsp;remain&nbsp;confidential.</p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT">Work&nbsp;Plan&nbsp;needs&nbsp;to&nbsp;be&nbsp;on&nbsp;list</p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT"><b>Onsite &nbsp;visit&nbsp;of&nbsp;IANA&nbsp;facility</b></p>
<p align="LEFT">Is&nbsp;there&nbsp;a&nbsp;need&nbsp;to&nbsp;maintain.&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT">Question&nbsp;how&nbsp;oftern&nbsp;does&nbsp;NTIA&nbsp;visit?&nbsp;Hardly</p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>&nbsp;Onsite&nbsp;visit&nbsp;is&nbsp;not&nbsp;needed</b></p>
<br align="LEFT">
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT"><b style="font-size: 16px;">Review&nbsp;of&nbsp;reporting&nbsp;requirements&nbsp;post-transition</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Second&nbsp;paragraph:&nbsp;agreed</b></p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT">Composition&nbsp;of&nbsp;the&nbsp;CSC:&nbsp;should&nbsp;match&nbsp;the&nbsp;suggestion&nbsp;in&nbsp;Overview</p>
<p align="LEFT">Keep&nbsp;in&nbsp;description&nbsp;to&nbsp;delineate&nbsp;diffences</p>
<br align="LEFT">
<p align="LEFT">CSC&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>Take&nbsp;out&nbsp;Travel&nbsp;funding&nbsp;out&nbsp;for&nbsp;Onsite&nbsp;visit.&nbsp;</b></p>
<p align="LEFT"><b>No&nbsp;travel&nbsp;support&nbsp;recommended&nbsp;for&nbsp;CSC&nbsp;</b></p>
<br align="LEFT">
<br align="LEFT">
<br align="LEFT">
<br align="LEFT">
<br align="LEFT">
<br align="LEFT">
<br align="LEFT">
<br align="LEFT">
<br align="LEFT">
<br align="LEFT">
<br align="LEFT" style="font-family: Calibri;">
</div>
</body>
</html>