<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Wingdings;
        panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
h2
        {mso-style-priority:9;
        mso-style-link:"Rubrik 2 Char";
        mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
        margin-right:0cm;
        mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
        margin-left:0cm;
        font-size:18.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
h3
        {mso-style-priority:9;
        mso-style-link:"Rubrik 3 Char";
        mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
        margin-right:0cm;
        mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
        margin-left:0cm;
        font-size:13.5pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:#0563C1;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:#954F72;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.E-postmall17
        {mso-style-type:personal;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:#1F497D;}
span.E-postmall18
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:#1F497D;}
span.Rubrik2Char
        {mso-style-name:"Rubrik 2 Char";
        mso-style-priority:9;
        mso-style-link:"Rubrik 2";
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        font-weight:bold;}
span.Rubrik3Char
        {mso-style-name:"Rubrik 3 Char";
        mso-style-priority:9;
        mso-style-link:"Rubrik 3";
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        font-weight:bold;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
        margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=SV link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>You&#8217;re fast Donna<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>I was considering how to handle all comments and have proposal below for handling one (!) of them:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Below you find my proposed &#8216;template&#8217; for handling a remark, and in the same time actually proposing some output. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Most text is from the Colour-coded document, but I also suggest an additional footnote to the proposal. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Cc This to Paul Kane, since he is lead of DTA: SLA/SLE. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Is this  a reasonable method? Who could take on further comments allotted to DTC? Would You coordinate Donna?  (I could e.g. do answers to Centr Board).<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Is proposed answer in this specific # OK?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Wingdings;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>J</span><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Staffan Jonson<o:p></o:p></span></p><h2><span lang=EN-US>*Comment #209&nbsp; CSC*<o:p></o:p></span></h2><h3><span lang=EN-US>General Direction<o:p></o:p></span></h3><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>CRISP is Supportive so long as independence between the Names and Numbers mechanisms is maintained.</span><span lang=EN-US><o:p></o:p></span></p><h3><span lang=EN-US>Concern<o:p></o:p></span></h3><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>* Customer Standing Committee </span><span lang=EN-US><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>- We understand the role of the CSC is to review the service level of the Names related IANA Functions. The Numbers community has proposed a separate mechanism for service level review of the IANA Numbering Services. We observe they are independent and do not see any issues so long as this independence is maintained, but we note the possibility of communication between the groups as needed.</span><span lang=EN-US><o:p></o:p></span></p><h3><span lang=EN-US>DT C response/action<o:p></o:p></span></h3><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span lang=EN-US>Dear Nurani et. al. I&#8217;m writing to you re. CRISP comments to CWG Proposal re. proposed feature of a Customer Standing Committee for the IANA functions. We have not yet discussed this aspect in full CWG, but are considering it in a smaller Design Team.&nbsp;&nbsp; <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span lang=EN-US>We interpret your comment as a &#8217;heads-up&#8217; on a similar and separate function proposed in the numbering community, and the potential need for further communication and maybe coordination between two similar mechanisms for service level review. We do however not see any direct challenge to the CWG proposal. Please return to us if that is not correct.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span lang=EN-US>Our proposed action following your remark is to amend the CWG proposal with an additional footnote, reminding ICG that there is a need for coordination of the two functions.&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span lang=EN-US>*Footnote*: &#8221;CWG and CRISP proposals have each one similar function for service level review in numbers and names. There could be beneficial if ICG in final proposal will coordinate, or even merge, two such similar functions into the same organization.&#8221;<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>Från:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> dt3-bounces@icann.org [mailto:dt3-bounces@icann.org] <b>För </b>Donna Austin<br><b>Skickat:</b> den 28 maj 2015 14:38<br><b>Till:</b> dt3@icann.org<br><b>Ämne:</b> [DTC CSC] Public comment action items<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>All<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Just when you thought we were done&#8230;<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>I would appreciate any feedback/insight/possible response to the comments highlighted in orange which related to the CSC. The comments are on pp. 52-58, and 96 and 97.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>I have not reviewed in any great detail and will have limited opportunity to do so over the next two days given the CWG calls.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Thanks<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Donna<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Marika Konings<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, 26 May 2015 1:18 PM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br><b>Subject:</b> [CWG-Stewardship] Public comment action items<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>Dear All,<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>Per today&#8217;s CWG-Stewardship meeting, please find attached an overview of the action items that were identified in the public comment review tool circulated earlier today, including colour coding to reflect the relevant design teams that are hopefully in a position to indicate a possible response, whether the comment has already been dealt with in subsequent conversations or whether it is an issue that warrants CWG consideration.&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>Best regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-AU style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>Marika<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></body></html>