[DTL] Notes from DT-L Call on 8 April at 13:00 UTC

Matthew Shears mshears at cdt.org
Wed Apr 8 16:25:32 UTC 2015


Allan

Looks good - question in line.

On 4/8/2015 3:18 PM, Allan MacGillivray wrote:
>
> Further to our call, this is what I propose for recommendations for DTL:
>
> DT-L Recommendations
>
> That:
>
>  1. the transition framework outlined in this document be further
>     developed into a detailed, fully functional, transition plan
>     within 24  months of the date of implementation of the overall
>     IANA stewardship transition;
>  2. the budget for IANA operations be augmented with specific funding
>     for the detailed transition plan development referred to in 1;
>
do we need to incorporate some committed funding for a potential 
transition?  In the case of emergency situation, bankruptcy, etc., 
should there be protected funding and resources to ensure a transition 
occurs?

Thanks!

Matthew
>
>  1. the process established for the potential transitioning of the
>     IANA functions to an operator  other than ICANN (the escalation
>     process) specifically recognize that the detailed transition plan
>     referred to in 1 must be in place before the commencement of the
>     transitioning process, and
>  2. (KSK recommendations from Jaap/Guru)
>
> *From:*dt4-bounces at icann.org [mailto:dt4-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf 
> Of *Grace Abuhamad
> *Sent:* April-08-15 9:46 AM
> *To:* dt4 at icann.org
> *Subject:* [DTL] Notes from DT-L Call on 8 April at 13:00 UTC
>
> Dear all,
>
> Notes from today’s call are below:
>
> *DT-L Call on 8 April at 13:00 UTC*
>
> *Google Doc*: 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QRiXP9-nxM-h8FgJ_FyM962EwdjnRESrDT2jOtlRZZ0/edit?usp=sharing
>
> *Wiki page*: 
> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/DT-L+Transition+Plan
>
> *Members of DT-L include*:
>
> James Gannon -- apologies
>
> Guru Acharya
>
> Matthew Shears
>
> Christopher Wilkinson -- not in attendance
>
> Jaap Akkerhuis
>
> Allan MacGillivray
>
> Graeme Bunton
>
> *Notes*:
>
> Scale back ambitions for the time-being and focus on current 
> transition plan plan.
>
> Suggestion to meet Friday's deadline is to:
>
>   * use the template and evolve it based on the current transition plan;
>   * elaborate on the high-level principles; and
>   * look at other dependencies with DTs (and other communities)
>   * elaborate a set of recommendations for how the plan should evolve
>     post transition
>
> *Action*(Matthew): Capture David's comments on DT-L. Also will want to 
> run this template by him tomorrow.
>
> *Dependencies with other DTs*:
>
> DT-O (Budget) will not be addressing budget costs for transition plan.
>
> DT-M (Escalation): one of their escalation steps may at some point be 
> a RFP or separation, but the detail is not being addressed.
>
> Currently the escalation step relating to RFP says '6. Initiate RFP or 
> [Process mechanism yet to be defined] [Pending Legal Advice & 
> Fundamental Bylaw definition in CCWG]'
>
> --> DT-L could recommend a process for transition
>
> *Action*(Allan): draft recommendations for escalation related aspects 
> (will circulate on mailing list)
>
> DT-N (Periodic Review) could also be related.
>
> *Things to note/edit in the document*:
>
> - Scaling back from original plan to write a new transition plan, and 
> instead focusing on the current transition plan and additions to it
>
> - Have not received C.7.2 but submitted a DIDP request for it 
> (submitted an received two other DIDP requests)
>
> *Action*(Jaap): draft text and recommendations for KSK rollover.
>
> *Action*(Guru): go over initial concerns (6 point in an email about 
> the trasition plan) and see if addressed in draft.
>
> *Analysis of Transition Plan*:
>
> 'Document Structure' needs to refer to new proposal structure
>
> Transition Actions
>
> 'Deliverables not requiring transition' -- note the DIDP request for C.7.2
>
> At best, we'll have a framework for a transition. What DT-L produces 
> can be taken to another level at a later point.
>
> *Deadline for edits to document in 24h. Aim for 13:00 UTC on 9 
> April**. This way, Matthew will send text to David for review/feedback. *
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dt4 mailing list
> dt4 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt4

-- 
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 (0)771 247 2987

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt4/attachments/20150408/e32945f9/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the dt4 mailing list