[DTL] Notes from DT-L Call on 8 April at 13:00 UTC

[CW Lists]

So, on that basis you would give two years, only, for any interested parties to complain and make as much trouble as they like to force the issue of a 'transition'.
To who? I can see the candidates lining up. Please bear in mind that there is a well established regulatory principle that control over critical infrastructure should not revert to dominant operators.

I wish to be recorded as opposing the language that DT-L is proposing.

CW


On 08 Apr 2015, at 16:18, Allan MacGillivray <allan.macgillivray at cira.ca> wrote:

> Further to our call, this is what I propose for recommendations for DTL:
>  
> DT-L Recommendations
> 
> That:
> 
> the transition framework outlined in this document be further developed into a detailed, fully functional, transition plan within 24  months of the date of implementation of the overall IANA stewardship transition;
> the budget for IANA operations be augmented with specific funding for the detailed transition plan development referred to in 1;
> the process established for the potential transitioning of the IANA functions to an operator  other than ICANN (the escalation process) specifically recognize that the detailed transition plan referred to in 1 must be in place before the commencement of the transitioning process, and
> (KSK recommendations from Jaap/Guru)
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> From: dt4-bounces at icann.org [mailto:dt4-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Grace Abuhamad
> Sent: April-08-15 9:46 AM
> To: dt4 at icann.org
> Subject: [DTL] Notes from DT-L Call on 8 April at 13:00 UTC
>  
> Dear all, 
> Notes from today’s call are below: 
>  
> DT-L Call on 8 April at 13:00 UTC
>  
> Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QRiXP9-nxM-h8FgJ_FyM962EwdjnRESrDT2jOtlRZZ0/edit?usp=sharing
>  
> Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/DT-L+Transition+Plan
>  
> Members of DT-L include: 
> James Gannon -- apologies
> Guru Acharya
> Matthew Shears
> Christopher Wilkinson -- not in attendance 
> Jaap Akkerhuis
> Allan MacGillivray
> Graeme Bunton 
>  
> Notes: 
> Scale back ambitions for the time-being and focus on current transition plan plan. 
>  
> Suggestion to meet Friday's deadline is to: 
> use the template and evolve it based on the current transition plan;
> elaborate on the high-level principles; and 
> look at other dependencies with DTs (and other communities)
> elaborate a set of recommendations for how the plan should evolve post transition 
>  
> Action (Matthew): Capture David's comments on DT-L. Also will want to run this template by him tomorrow. 
>  
> Dependencies with other DTs: 
> DT-O (Budget) will not be addressing budget costs for transition plan. 
>  
> DT-M (Escalation): one of their escalation steps may at some point be a RFP or separation, but the detail is not being addressed. 
> Currently the escalation step relating to RFP says '6. Initiate RFP or [Process mechanism yet to be defined] [Pending Legal Advice & Fundamental Bylaw definition in CCWG]'
> --> DT-L could recommend a process for transition 
> Action (Allan): draft recommendations for escalation related aspects (will circulate on mailing list)
>  
> DT-N (Periodic Review) could also be related. 
>  
> Things to note/edit in the document: 
> - Scaling back from original plan to write a new transition plan, and instead focusing on the current transition plan and additions to it
> - Have not received C.7.2 but submitted a DIDP request for it (submitted an received two other DIDP requests)
>  
> Action (Jaap): draft text and recommendations for KSK rollover. 
> Action (Guru): go over initial concerns (6 point in an email about the trasition plan) and see if addressed in draft. 
>  
> Analysis of Transition Plan: 
> 'Document Structure' needs to refer to new proposal structure
> Transition Actions
> 'Deliverables not requiring transition' -- note the DIDP request for C.7.2
>  
> At best, we'll have a framework for a transition. What DT-L produces can be taken to another level at a later point. 
>  
> Deadline for edits to document in 24h. Aim for 13:00 UTC on 9 April. This way, Matthew will send text to David for review/feedback. 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> dt4 mailing list
> dt4 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt4

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt4/attachments/20150408/7e7b8a2c/attachment.html>