[DTL] Notes from DT-L Call on 8 April at 13:00 UTC

[Matthew Shears]

Hi David

I think we are as far as we can get without your review and thoughts.  
Hope you don't mind giving this a careful read.  Please let us know if 
there are things that are missing, don't make sense, etc.

If you edit in suggesting mode that would appreciated.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QRiXP9-nxM-h8FgJ_FyM962EwdjnRESrDT2jOtlRZZ0/edit

Just for background...  Given time constraints, etc., we decided it was 
probably best to go back to the existing plan and use that as the basis 
for our review.  We have characterized our evolution of the existing doc 
as a "business continuity" framework rather than a full plan and 
recommend that a full(er) plan be developed post transition.

Thanks so much.

Matthew

On 4/8/2015 7:04 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> No worries. When I get it, I'll take a look and get back to you asap.
>
> Regards,
> -drc
>
> From: Matthew Shears <mshears at cdt.org <mailto:mshears at cdt.org>>
> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 at 7:14 AM
> To: David Conrad <david.conrad at icann.org <mailto:david.conrad at icann.org>>
> Subject: Fwd: [DTL] Notes from DT-L Call on 8 April at 13:00 UTC
>
>
>     Hi David
>
>     Hope you don't mind me running this template by your tomorrow for
>     your feedback.
>
>     Apologies for the short notice.
>
>     Matthew
>
>     -------- Forwarded Message --------
>     Subject: 	[DTL] Notes from DT-L Call on 8 April at 13:00 UTC
>     Date: 	Wed, 8 Apr 2015 13:45:52 +0000
>     From: 	Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
>     To: 	dt4 at icann.org<dt4 at icann.org>
>
>
>
>     Dear all,
>     Notes from today’s call are below:
>
>     *DT-L Call on 8 April at 13:00 UTC*
>
>     *Google Doc*:
>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QRiXP9-nxM-h8FgJ_FyM962EwdjnRESrDT2jOtlRZZ0/edit?usp=sharing
>     *Wiki page*:
>     https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/DT-L+Transition+Plan
>
>     *Members of DT-L include*:
>     James Gannon -- apologies
>     Guru Acharya
>     Matthew Shears
>     Christopher Wilkinson -- not in attendance
>     Jaap Akkerhuis
>     Allan MacGillivray
>     Graeme Bunton
>
>     *Notes*:
>     Scale back ambitions for the time-being and focus on current
>     transition plan plan.
>
>     Suggestion to meet Friday's deadline is to:
>
>       * use the template and evolve it based on the current transition
>         plan;
>       * elaborate on the high-level principles; and
>       * look at other dependencies with DTs (and other communities)
>       * elaborate a set of recommendations for how the plan should
>         evolve post transition
>
>
>     *Action* (Matthew): Capture David's comments on DT-L. Also will
>     want to run this template by him tomorrow.
>
>     *Dependencies with other DTs*:
>     DT-O (Budget) will not be addressing budget costs for transition
>     plan.
>
>     DT-M (Escalation): one of their escalation steps may at some point
>     be a RFP or separation, but the detail is not being addressed.
>     Currently the escalation step relating to RFP says '6. Initiate
>     RFP or [Process mechanism yet to be defined] [Pending Legal Advice
>     & Fundamental Bylaw definition in CCWG]'
>     --> DT-L could recommend a process for transition
>     *Action* (Allan): draft recommendations for escalation related
>     aspects (will circulate on mailing list)
>
>     DT-N (Periodic Review) could also be related.
>
>     *Things to note/edit in the document*:
>     - Scaling back from original plan to write a new transition plan,
>     and instead focusing on the current transition plan and additions
>     to it
>     - Have not received C.7.2 but submitted a DIDP request for it
>     (submitted an received two other DIDP requests)
>
>     *Action* (Jaap): draft text and recommendations for KSK rollover.
>     *Action* (Guru): go over initial concerns (6 point in an email
>     about the trasition plan) and see if addressed in draft.
>     *Analysis of Transition Plan*:
>     'Document Structure' needs to refer to new proposal structure
>     Transition Actions
>     'Deliverables not requiring transition' -- note the DIDP request
>     for C.7.2
>
>     At best, we'll have a framework for a transition. What DT-L
>     produces can be taken to another level at a later point.
>
>     *Deadline for edits to document in 24h. Aim for 13:00 UTC on 9
>     April. This way, Matthew will send text to David for
>     review/feedback. *
>
>
>

-- 
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 (0)771 247 2987

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt4/attachments/20150409/8b34524c/attachment.html>