[DTL] Language for DT-L recommendation

[Graeme Bunton]

I think that works quite nicely.
There was some discussion of who would develop the detailed plan. I'm 
not sure if we need to put that in, but I think Chris Despain's comment 
that it should be part of the IFOs regular business continuity planning 
makes sense.

Graeme

On 4/14/2015 9:31 AM, Matthew Shears wrote:
> Hi all
>
> As per our discussions this morning, how about the following changes 
> to the proposal recommendations (attached):
>
> In recommendation 2 -  if we change the word "should" to "must" does 
> that take care of the need to commit the parties to the development of 
> the plan?
>
> Then we could add as recommendation 6:
>
> /Once developed, the full Transition to Successor IANA Operator Plan 
> should be reviewed every year to ensure that it remains up to date and 
> every five years to ensure that it remains fit for purpose./
>
> These would also be ported into the template.
>
> Does this make sense.  Is the changing of the one word sufficient?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Matthew
>
> -- 
> Matthew Shears
> Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
> + 44 (0)771 247 2987
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dt4 mailing list
> dt4 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt4

-- 
_________________________
Graeme Bunton
Manager, Management Information Systems
Manager, Public Policy
Tucows Inc.
PH: 416 535 0123 ext 1634

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt4/attachments/20150414/2da6968a/attachment.html>