[DTL] Design Team L - Template for Co-Chairs

Guru Acharya gurcharya at gmail.com
Mon Mar 16 15:18:11 UTC 2015


James, I support your candidature to lead the DT.

I agree with Matthews comment about the need for such transition planning
even in the internal models.
On 16 Mar 2015 16:30, "Matthew Shears" <mshears at cdt.org> wrote:

>  James
>
> Thanks see inline
>
> On 3/16/2015 10:29 AM, James Gannon wrote:
>
>  Hi Everyone,
>
>
>
> If possible I’d like to finalize the template by 23:59 UTC today 16-March,
> I’ve added one final section based on the transition areas identified in
> C.7.3 I think the document has enough detail to go to the co-chairs so I
> propose final comments by 23:59 UTC.
>
> Fine by me - will add additional comments later today
>
>
>
> Christopher with regards to your current comments I feel that while valid
> that their DT Is going to be looking at the technical aspect of the
> transition if needed, if an internal to ICANN solution is identified then
> the work of this DT may not be used in the final proposal however it is
> still valuable exploratory work both for the CWG and may be valuable to
> ICANN Disaster Recovery and Stability planning.
>
> Actually believe that this is valuable and important part of the IANA
> functions "contract" regardless of the model - even in an internal model
> this type of transition/contingency plan is necessary - separability in
> some form exists in most if not all models. And even if there were no
> separability the operator should have such a plan "just in case" just like
> any entity providing a critical infrastructure related service should have.
>
>
>
> I would like some feedback on two items:
>
>
>
> ·         Is everyone is happy with me leading the DT, I’m relatively new
> to ICANN but in a way that possible gives me some neutrality on the issues
> but I want to point out that Guru and Matthew were the ones initially
> calling for the DT creation so I’m happy to yield to others.
>
> Fine by me.
>
>   ·         DO we feel that the DT has sufficient membership to examine
> all the areas in question, if not can we identify areas that we would like
> to target participation from, who would be valuable to this exercise?
>
> As we evolve the plan we should assess where we need additional
> inputs/expertise, etc., and put out a call for volunteers
>
>
>
> Thanks everyone and I hope that we can get started on analyzing and
> critiquing our source documents in the very near future, and then get
> working on the other phases ASAP.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> *James Gannon*
>
> *Director*
>
> *Cyber Invasion Ltd*
>
> *Dun Laoghaire, County Dublin, Ireland*
>
> *Office: +353 (1)663-8787*
>
> *Cell: +353 (86)175-3581*
>
> *Email:james at cyberinvasion.net
> <james at cyberinvasion.net?subject=Via:%20Email%20Signature>*
>
> *GPG: https://keybase.io/jayg <https://keybase.io/jayg>*
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dt4 mailing listdt4 at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt4
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dt4 mailing list
> dt4 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt4
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt4/attachments/20150316/b464c8df/attachment.html>


More information about the dt4 mailing list