[Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..

Mon Aug 4 09:13:40 UTC 2014

Yes, that is correct. But as you noted below, anyone should feel
encouraged to send any ideas / suggestions they may have as well by email
so we can consider those together with the survey responses.

Best regards,

Marika

On 04/08/14 12:08, "Manal Ismail" <manal at tra.gov.eg> wrote:

>Thanks Marika .. good suggestion .. will do ..
>I hope we will have more responses to this question in future responses
>but those who have already responded cannot re-edit their responses,
>right?
>Just to make sure I have an answer, if asked ..
>
>Kind Regards
>--Manal 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings at icann.org]
>Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 10:48 AM
>To: Manal Ismail; Jonathan Robinson
>Cc: gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
>Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
>
>Thanks, Manal. Looking at the responses to date, it would also be good if
>you could encourage respondents to provide any ideas / suggestions they
>may have for improvements. The open ended questions have only gotten up to
>5 responses per question and those are where I think we'll probably get
>the most important feedback.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Marika
>
>On 04/08/14 11:42, "Manal Ismail" <manal at tra.gov.eg> wrote:
>
>>Indeed great news ..
>>Thanks for the update .. will make sure to thank GAC colleagues who have
>>responded and share with them the new number !!
>>Kind Regards
>>--Manal 
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com]
>>Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 10:12 AM
>>To: 'Marika Konings'; Manal Ismail
>>Cc: gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
>>Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
>>
>>Great.  That's good to hear.  Starts to feel like meaningful data / a
>>good
>>sample.
>>
>>Jonathan
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings at icann.org]
>>Sent: 04 August 2014 08:41
>>To: Manal Ismail; Jonathan Robinson
>>Cc: gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
>>Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
>>
>>Dear All,
>>
>>I'm happy to report that the reminders are having an impact as we've
>>already gone from 7 responses to 24.
>>
>>Best regards,
>>
>>Marika
>>
>>On 02/08/14 11:27, "Manal Ismail" <manal at tra.gov.eg> wrote:
>>
>>>Many thanks Amr and Jonathan for your replies .. Glad we all share the
>>>same view 'the more feedback, the more helpful it would be' ..
>>>Jonathan, the extension requested was till the end of the month, which I
>>>understood as Aug 31st .. But if colleagues see Aug 27th is more
>>>appropriate for a certain reason(s), please let me know ..
>>>
>>>Kind Regards
>>>--Manal
>>>
>>>Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>On Aug 1, 2014, at 6:52 PM, "Jonathan Robinson"
>>><jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>	Thanks,
>>>
>>>	 
>>>
>>>	Agreed, I can see no harm in that  Are we proposing to leave it as
>>long
>>>as 27th?
>>>
>>>	 
>>>
>>>	Thank-you Manal for raising it again.
>>>
>>>	 
>>>
>>>	Jonathan
>>>
>>>	 
>>>
>>>	From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org]
>>>	Sent: 01 August 2014 13:10
>>>	To: Manal Ismail
>>>	Cc: jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com; gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
>>>	Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
>>>
>>>	 
>>>
>>>	Thanks Manal,
>>>
>>>	 
>>>
>>>	I thought we agreed to extend the deadline for one week past the end
>>of
>>>July during our last call. I have no objection to extending it further
>>>(until August 27th). The more feedback we get, the more helpful it will
>>>ultimately be. I suppose the results of the survey will also be helpful
>>>to the upcoming GAC/GNSO reverse liaison¹s work going forward.
>>>
>>>	 
>>>
>>>	Thanks again.
>>>
>>>	 
>>>
>>>	Amr
>>>
>>>	 
>>>
>>>	On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:55 PM, Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg> wrote:
>>>
>>>	
>>>	
>>>	
>>>
>>>	Dear Jonathan ..
>>>
>>>	Dear All ..
>>>
>>>	 
>>>
>>>	As promised on our last conference call, Suzanne, Mark and myself
>>>brought to GAC colleagues attention, on yesterday¹s GAC conference call,
>>>the survey to assess the GAC's familiarity with current GNSO mechanisms
>>>.. We made sure to highlight:
>>>
>>>	-          That the survey is short
>>>
>>>	-          our to receive further GAC responses
>>>
>>>	-          that the deadline has been extended till July 31st , and
>>was
>>>due yesterday
>>>
>>>	and would like to update consultation group colleagues on the
>>feedback
>>>received yesterday:
>>>
>>>	-          further extension of the deadline was requested (till end
>>of
>>>August to accommodate summer vacations)
>>>
>>>	-          remarks that the survey is not easy to fill, despite its
>>>shortness
>>>
>>>	 
>>>
>>>	I have also offered to GAC members to send any feedback, in that
>>>context, over email if they feel the survey questions do not cover what
>>>the feedback they would like to provide ..
>>>
>>>	 
>>>
>>>	Hope it¹s ok to further extend the survey deadline, particularly
>>that
>>>our next conference call is not until Aug. 27th ..
>>>
>>>	 
>>>
>>>	Kind Regards
>>>
>>>	--Manal
>>>
>>>	_______________________________________________
>>>	Gac-gnso-cg mailing list
>>>	Gac-gnso-cg at icann.org <mailto:Gac-gnso-cg at icann.org>
>>>	https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
>>><https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg>
>>>
>>>	 
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Gac-gnso-cg mailing list
>>>Gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
>>>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5056 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140804/b4e1bb8c/smime.p7s>