[Gac-gnso-cg] TO DO: GNSO / GAC Early Engagement Document

Tue Jan 14 17:38:52 UTC 2014

Dear Manal and colleagues,

I´ve been carefully going through the set of proposals we, at the WG on GAC Working methods, prepared for the Buenos Aires meeting and I can´t find any which recommends to filter information to the GAC on initiated PDPs or generally speaking, any issues discussed at ICANN constituencies on the basis of its public policy implications. So, I would say the third option is the correct one. I didn´t attend the BA meeting, but as far as I know, this particular aspect of the proposals was not discussed.

I dare to say that the GAC prefers to receive notices of all issues to assess by itself if they deserve public policy attention, in case some implications are overlooked at the beginning of the PDP  or only transpire later when the policy is developed.

The criteria for the GAC Secretariat to highlight some issues over others are only their possible effects on public policy goals. We didn´t provided specific examples or elaborated this further.

Best regards,

Gema

De: Manal Ismail [mailto:manal at tra.gov.eg]
Enviado el: martes, 14 de enero de 2014 14:15
Para: Campillos Gonzalez, Gema Maria; Olof Nordling; Winterfeldt, Brian J.; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Asunto: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] TO DO: GNSO / GAC Early Engagement Document

Many thanks Brian for the suggestion ..
As Olof mentioned there is a system already in place which, I believe, is not yet fully utilized ..

When we first discussed this, I recall that the GAC requested to receive everything and make its own decision on what involves public policy and what does not .. Having said that, I just want to make sure that this is still the case .. So my understanding, and I would very much appreciate being corrected by my GAC colleagues, my understanding is that GAC members want to receive everything, yet in a shorter, brief, well-structured format highlighting any developments or differences from previous versions .. Is this correct? Does this still hold?

So Gema, does the text below mean that:

-          The GAC would like to receive Only issues revealing public policy interests as scanned by GAC Secretariat, or

-          The GAC would like to receive everything and make its own decision, or

-          The GAC would like to receive everything and make its own decision, yet the GAC would also like to receive further notifications from GAC secretariat on certain important issues? Do we have criteria for those?
Sincere apologies if I have misunderstood the text ..

Kind Regards
--Manal

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Campillos Gonzalez, Gema Maria
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 1:50 PM
To: Olof Nordling; Winterfeldt, Brian J.; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org<mailto:GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] TO DO: GNSO / GAC Early Engagement Document

Dear all,

I´m glad the importance of highlighting public policy issues is noted. This need was also underlined in the proposals made by the WG on GAC working methods, but we assigned this task to the GAC Secretariat. I copy the paragraphs dealing with this issue in the recap paper for BA of the work done by the WG.

Drafting papers containing background information and explaining the public policy aspects relating to each agenda issue along with other interests affected and if known, the positions of other constituencies in ICANN. (Page 2 of the recap paper for BA)

In relation to the GAC Early Engagement in GNSO Policy Development Process, GAC members would appreciate if the GAC Secretariat, who is the recipient of notices of new developments in a PDP, prepared each time a brief note to the GAC summarizing the main new elements since the previous notice, and advising the GAC of public policy issues that deserve attention.

Early Engagement documents are available at the GAC website in different languages and the GAC is advised of these postings through its mailing list. The latest post is an October update from the GNSO PDPs. At the bottom of the page, there´s a link to the monthly policy updates provided by ICANN. As this information can be hard to follow and assess for GAC members, the Secretariat could scan these notices to find issues revealing public policy interests and prepare a brief note to grab the attention of the GAC to them. (Pages 9-10 of recap paper for BA)

Cheers,

Gema

De: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] En nombre de Olof Nordling
Enviado el: viernes, 10 de enero de 2014 18:32
Para: Winterfeldt, Brian J.; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org<mailto:GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org>
Asunto: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] TO DO: GNSO / GAC Early Engagement Document

Brian and all,
Actually, there is a system in place already, close to what you are requesting:  for each active GNSO PDP (and for ccNSO as well), a monthly one-pager update is produced, posted on the GAC website, notified on the GAC mailing list and translated into six languages.
That said, currently these one-pagers do not specifically identify or highlight public policy implications, so I believe your request can be focused on that aspect, given the existing information structure as a basis.
Very best regards
Olof

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Winterfeldt, Brian J.
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 5:00 PM
To: GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org<mailto:GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] TO DO: GNSO / GAC Early Engagement Document

Dear all:

I think the updated version of the document looks great, and would only add one inquiry to the Working Group phase of the PDP, namely whether it is possible to create a neutral party, possibly within ICANN staff, charged with flagging any PDPs with clear public policy implications for the GAC.

The aim is to lighten their load in making sure that PDPs with obvious policy implications, such as the recently initiated Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation PDP, do not slip through any cracks.  It would be great to hear views on this suggestion.

Thank you,

Brian

Brian J. Winterfeldt
Head of Internet Practice
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
2900 K Street NW, North Tower - Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20007-5118
p / (202) 625-3562 f / (202) 339-8244
brian.winterfeldt at kattenlaw.com<mailto:brian.winterfeldt at kattenlaw.com> / www.kattenlaw.com<http://www.kattenlaw.com/>

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 8:53 AM
To: GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org<mailto:GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org>
Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] GNSO / GAC Early Engagement Document

All,

For our records, an updated version of document which tracks current and purposed mechanisms for GAC engagement in the GNSO PDP.

Jonathan

===========================================================

CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before the Internal Revenue

Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used

by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.

===========================================================

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive

use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is

proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you

are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or

distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction.  Please notify

the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original

message without making any copies.

===========================================================

NOTIFICATION:  Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership that has

elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997).

===========================================================

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140114/af9c6053/attachment-0001.html>