[Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

[Manal Ismail]

Many thanks Suzanne and apologies for replying to earlier messages
before I complete reading the whole thread ..

If I understand your proposal correctly, it is indeed the intention .. 

The plan is to circulate a short, concise briefing note to update and
set expectations of both the GAC and the GNSO .. I don't think, but I
stand to be corrected, that we'll be attaching the full day to day and
PDP documents .. Rather we will be preparing slides that reflect agreed
parts of both work tracks .. 

 

Kind Regards

--Manal 

 

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Suzanne Radell
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 7:53 PM
To: Jonathan Robinson; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

 

Hi Jonathan, and apologies for taking longer than expected.  I just sent
an email out in the past five minutes.  Please let me know what you
think.  One possible solution to avoiding a further delay in getting the
briefing note out is to send the note out as it, with whatever edits
you've received to date, and hold off on the attachments (write ups of
the day to day and PDP work to date) pending further refinements.  Would
that help?  Cheers, Suz

 

From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 1:39 PM
To: Suzanne Radell; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

 

Thanks Suzanne.  Just checking, would like me to hold off on finalising
the Briefing Note prior to you providing additional information / input?
Jonathan

 

From: Suzanne Radell [mailto:SRadell at ntia.doc.gov] 
Sent: 02 June 2014 22:01
To: Jonathan Robinson; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

 

Thanks, Jonathan; glad to know the edits were helpful.  I plan to look
over the material tonight and since we have cancelled tomorrow's 9 a.m.
call, I am shooting for a suggested approach tomorrow before noon my
time; will that work?  Cheers, Suz

 

From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 4:58 PM
To: Suzanne Radell; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

 

OK thanks Suzanne.  Your edits definitely improve the document so
definitely a case of better late than never.

When do you think you can get the additional thoughts on the PDP track
or are those not a condition for finalising the briefing?

Looking at your note below, I suspect that they are intended for the
presentation to be delivered in London.  Am I correct?

Key point is to get the briefing out ASAP i.e. sufficiently ahead of
London.  Jonathan.

 

From: Suzanne Radell [mailto:SRadell at ntia.doc.gov] 
Sent: 02 June 2014 19:31
To: Jonathan Robinson; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note
Importance: High

 

Thanks, Jonathan, and apologies to all for not getting these suggested
edits in sooner; I hope they can be taken into account.  The edits
relate to the survey, which I have understood as an important first step
in determining whether the existing/current means by which GAC members
are informed about upcoming PDPs at the initial stage has value/utility
or needs to be reconsidered.  It has been my impression that we intended
to emphasize the importance of getting feedback on this stage from the
GAC during our exchange in London.  I have some additional thoughts to
share on the presentation of the PDP portion of our work and will do so
separately.  Thanks, Suz

 

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 12:44 PM
To: GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note

 

All,

 

I have revised the briefing note to accommodate suggested changes /
inputs.

 

Some of the comments suggestions pertained more to our work as a group
so we need to pick that up on list or in our meetings.

 

Please see attached the final version in word (in case last-minute
changes are needed) and in PDF (for distribution) formats.

 

Thanks,

 

 

Jonathan

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140604/d4188b42/attachment.html>