[Gac-gnso-cg] Presentation for Sunday

Jonathan Robinson jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com
Sun Jun 22 14:08:22 UTC 2014


Thanks Olof

 

From: Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling at icann.org] 
Sent: 22 June 2014 09:31
To: Jonathan Robinson; 'Manal Ismail'; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Presentation for Sunday

 

Hi Jonathan,

The CG matters will be the mainstay, as agreed. If time permits, the GAC may
want to exchange views on IGO protections and the next steps in that process
(NGPC recently sent Heather a copy of their letter to you) and possibly on
handling of the IANA stewardship transition and ICANN accountability topics.

All the best

Olof

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org]
On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2014 9:03 AM
To: 'Manal Ismail'; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Presentation for Sunday

 

Hi Manal,

 

Please can you confirm what the agenda item is for the GNSO / GAC Session
today?

 

Does it deal with more than the GAC / GNSO CG?

 

Thanks,

 

 

Jonathan

 

From: Manal Ismail [mailto:manal at tra.gov.eg] 
Sent: 20 June 2014 01:11
To: Jonathan Robinson; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Presentation for Sunday

 

Many thanks Jonathan for the editorial review .. Looks perfect ..

I suggest that we add the names of our great support team on slide 23 ..

I would also appreciate clarification on the following as I'm not sure I
understand what's meant by: 

-          Slide 19:  "If PDP not initiated on issue requested by AC) Option
is to request reconsideration (not used to date)" , and

-          (TBC) on slides 4,5 & 6 .. 

Thanks again for the great enhancements ..

Kind Regards

--Manal

 

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org]
On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 11:46 PM
To: GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Presentation for Sunday

 

All,

 

The presentation for Sunday has been modified according to various inputs by
Marika who has helped by holding the pen.

 

I have now given it an editorial review and cut the words down, created some
emphasis through red, bold or underlined text etc.

 

If you have time, please review for substance or detail issues and feel free
to point out changes required.

 

Many thanks.

 

Jonathan

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140622/6ea6891c/attachment.html>


More information about the Gac-gnso-cg mailing list