[Gac-gnso-cg] Agenda for Tues. May 27th cc ..

[Manal Ismail]

Many thanks Suzanne for your timely suggestion, as Jonathan and I have
assumed the responsibility of getting back to the group with proposed
slides for London ..

 

Your suggestion aligns with my thinking, which I also have to admit not
having the chance to discuss with Jonathan yet .. I assume, when you
mention 'the two first steps' that you mean the first 2 phases 'Issues
scoping' and 'Issue Report' .. Hope I'm right .. 

 

Here is one way to go about it: 

1.       One slide to introduce the PDP work track

2.       A second slide with the GNSO PDP diagram, with circles to
indicate the phases or stages, as you have proposed (would be helpful if
you or Marika could kindly confirm the exact diagram)

3.       A third slide on the group's proposal regarding new/enhanced
GAC engagement opportunities/mechanisms during phase 1 (Issue Scoping),
which should basically conclude our discussion, in light of answers
provided to the posed questions and suggestions proposed to address
raised issues (this still needs to be further discussed and concluded)

4.       A fourth similar slide for phase 2 (Issue Report)

5.       A fifth & final one covering what we expect from our
constituencies in London: for example, GAC/GNSO approval to proceed as
suggested, concrete responses to specific questions, ... etc 

 

Suzanne, let me know what you think .. 

Would also appreciate thoughts from other colleagues ..

 

Kind Regards

--Manal

 

From: Suzanne Radell [mailto:SRadell at ntia.doc.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 2:59 PM
To: Manal Ismail; gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
Subject: RE: Agenda for Tues. May 27th cc ..

 

Thanks, Manal and Jonathan.  I must offer apologies for missing today's
call, as I need to be in a briefing for Larry Strickling at 9:30.  I did
want to offer a suggestion for the group to consider, with the full
disclosure that Amr and I have not had a chance to compare notes on this
as yet.  In thinking about how to present our work to date on the PDP
process, it struck me that we might want to reduce the document we are
using as a working document to a cover sheet that uses the GNSO graph
(with circles to indicate the phases or stages), with a red line or some
other means of identifying that we're focusing at the outset on the two
first steps; the parts of the text that address just those steps could
follow.  

 

Thanks for considering this idea, and please feel free to discard it if
others don't agree.  Thanks to Marika and Olof for preparing the survey;
think it's very helpful.  Cheers, Suz

 

Suzanne Murray Radell

Senior Policy Advisor, NTIA/OIA

sradell at ntia.doc.gov

202-482-3167

 

 

 

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Manal Ismail
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 5:38 PM
To: gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Agenda for Tues. May 27th cc ..

 

Dear All ..

 

Here is the agenda Jonathan and I compiled for tomorrow's call:

 

1.       Review the briefing note to be circulated in advance of ICANN
London (version: attached) 

 

2.       Review Day-to-day work track (version: attached)

*         Discuss / Finalize options A, F & E 

 

3.       Review PDP work track (version: attached)

*         Discuss / Finalize proposals for phases 1 & 2

 

4.       Consider material for ICANN London

*         Presentation 

*         The survey (Draft here:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?PREVIEW_MODE=DO_NOT_USE_THIS_LINK_FOR
_COLLECTION&sm=ezpA8R9gJ46f0o8Zpss1JqDqTwjJx7XstxMT5d73LSY%3d)

 

5.       AOB

 

All referenced documents are attached for your convenience .. 

Marika, appreciate your confirmation that I've attached the most recent
versions ..

 

Kind Regards

--Manal

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140529/7bcae187/attachment.html>