<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><div>Hi Mikey, all,</div><div><br></div><div>I've had a look through the document and made some proposed edits / additions in red (where it would allow me) - see attached. I think this is a useful exercise in understanding the current PDP and opportunities for engagement, however it does not capture or address some of the steps proposed by Suzanne a while back, which was included in the Word document (see also attached – including Mikey's comments). Of course, one possible approach could be for the group to work through the existing opportunities first and decide if/how these can be improved, following which you may have a clearer idea of what is still missing.</div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Marika</div><div><br></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt"><span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span> Mike O'Connor <<a href="mailto:mike@haven2.com">mike@haven2.com</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span> Tuesday 14 January 2014 17:50<br><span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span> "<a href="mailto:GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org">GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org">GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span> Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] a first-try at the first-half of the GNSO PDP process diagram<br></div><div><br></div><div><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div><br></div>
hi all,
<div><br></div><div>i’ve bashed through the rest of the process diagram. so now it’s more complete, although still badly in need of review and revision. </div><div><br></div><div>if i were in charge, i’d probably suggest that we go through it together on a call — just to familiarize people with it and elicit the first round of questions. would it be OK if i took about 15 minutes on our next call for a quick overview?</div><div><br></div><div>for all you GNSO process-expert type people (Marika, this means you!) — feel free to wing corrections my way. </div><div><br></div><div>thanks,</div><div><br></div><div>mikey</div><div><br></div><div></div></div></div></span></body></html>