<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>
<div>Dear All,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please find below the notes and action items from yesterday’s GAC-GNSO Consultation Group meeting. The next meeting has been scheduled for 6 January 2014 at 14.00 UTC.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best regards,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Marika</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><b>Notes 16 December 2014:</b></div>
<div><b><br>
</b></div>
<div>1. GAC Early Engagement in new PDPs:</div>
<ul>
<li>Review of Issue Scoping Gac Quick Look Mechanism document (see attached)</li><li>Discuss which, if any, questions should be called out for further discussion by GNSO and GAC in Singapore</li><li>Consider using highlighted areas in the form of questions to respective groups</li><li>How to best present it to avoid information overload as not everyone will have been privy to the detailed conversations?</li><li>Consider selecting a test case in which this could be used.</li><li>Consider making the joint GNSO-GAC meeting in Singapore a working session to encourage debate </li><li>GAC CG members to review proposed timelines and comment on whether these are reasonable or whether a F2F meeting would be required to take a decision on recommendation of Quick Look Mechanism Committee - also a question to be put forward to the whole GAC
in Singapore. </li><li>Some noted that as it merely concerns flagging, it may be possible to do this intercessionally. </li><li>Flagging at Preliminary Issue Report stage will allow the GAC to organize and prepare as deemed appropriate to provide substantive input to the PDP WG at a later stage of the processs.</li><li>Possible question could be: would a 20 day timeframe be sufficient for a quick look mechanism.</li><li>Consider whether there are other variations of current options a, b and c?</li><li>Consider adding questions to each row intended for GAC-GNSO input </li><li>Make sure that everyone understands that this is the beginning of the beginning - early engagement as a first step of a longer process of engagement in the PDP. Add step after 11 to make clear that this is just the end of the initial phase (issue scoping).</li></ul>
<div>2. GAC-GNSO dialogue on ongoing topics </div>
<div>o Any updates or requirements regarding the IGO/INGO ongoing coordination?</div>
<ul>
<li>IGO coalition is engaging with NGPC as well as reviewing questions submitted by the GNSO IGO-INGO Curative Rights PDP WG</li></ul>
<div>o Do we need to develop a general proposal for this work track?</div>
<ul>
<li>Charter highlights deliverables in relation to this area</li><li>Consider whether a flow chart or table should be developed for this area. Marika to work with Mason on a draft for the next meeting.</li></ul>
<div><u>Next meeting is scheduled for 6 January 2015 at 14.00 UTC.</u></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>