[Gnso-bylaws-dt] MP3 and Attendance - GNSO Bylaws Implementation Drafting Team - 10 October 2016

Tue Oct 11 10:36:57 UTC 2016

Hi Steve

Some suggested edits and text shifting in the attached.

I am a little concerned as to the implications of this comment:

/Note: Three DT members (IPC, ISPCP, and BC) abstained from indicating 
approval of Council voting thresholds, *as they do not support Council 
exercising any of the new powers by voting within the present 
House-bound structure*./

Are you suggesting that the GNSO cannot exercise the community powers 
until the issue of the House structure is addressed?  Please elaborate.

Thanks.

Matthew

On 10/10/2016 20:43, Steve DelBianco wrote:
> Thanks, Steve.  I’ve made your requested changes in the attached “Map”.
>
> Also attached is the revised Final Report by our DT.  Note that the 
> Background and Recommendations are on page 1.   On page 2 we have the 
> “Evolution of these recommendations, including Drafting Team 
> deliberations”.   I removed names of DT members in that section.
>
> I’ll be traveling over the next 4 hours and will look for DT member 
> reactions/edits by 12 UTC on Tuesday 11-Oct.
>
> —Steve
>
>
> From: Steve Metalitz <met at msk.com <mailto:met at msk.com>>
> Date: Monday, October 10, 2016 at 2:54 PM
> To: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org 
> <mailto:sdelbianco at netchoice.org>>, Yesim Nazlar 
> <yesim.nazlar at icann.org <mailto:yesim.nazlar at icann.org>>, 
> "gnso-bylaws-dt at icann.org <mailto:gnso-bylaws-dt at icann.org>" 
> <gnso-bylaws-dt at icann.org <mailto:gnso-bylaws-dt at icann.org>>
> Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>" 
> <gnso-secs at icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>>
> Subject: RE: [Gnso-bylaws-dt] MP3 and Attendance - GNSO Bylaws 
> Implementation Drafting Team - 10 October 2016
>
> Please correct spelling of “excerpts” on page 1, and of 
> “Recommendation” on the far right column.
>
> In only three instances, two of them dealing with Section 6.1, the 
> recommendations column employs the term “consensus.”  In one of these 
> instances, 3 of the 9 DT members oppose what is described as the 
> “consensus” view (GNSO Council speaks for GNSO in all cases).   In the 
> other (support required to approve GNSO representative on EC), I 
> believe IPC was the only constituency to oppose the view that a 
> majority of each House is sufficient.  In the third instance (section 
> 16.1), I believe the support for the supermajority requirement on 
> amending PTI articles of incorporation was unanimous.  It is confusing 
> to use the word “consensus” to describe three different levels of 
> support, especially when none of the other recommendations use the 
> word.  So I suggest that “consensus” be dropped from the 
> recommendations column.
>
> Steve Metalitz
>
> *image001*
>
> *Steven J. Metalitz *|*Partner, through his professional corporation*
>
> T: 202.355.7902 |met at msk.com <mailto:met at msk.com>**
>
> *Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp**LLP*|*www.msk.com <http://www.msk.com/>*
>
> 1818 N Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036
>
> *_THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY 
> FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED 
> RECIPIENTS._**THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, 
> AND AS SUCH IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS 
> MESSAGE IS NOT AN INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY 
> REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, FORWARDING OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS 
> STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY REPLY E-MAIL OR 
> TELEPHONE, AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND ALL ATTACHMENTS FROM 
> YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU.*
>
> *From:*gnso-bylaws-dt-bounces at icann.org 
> <mailto:gnso-bylaws-dt-bounces at icann.org> 
> [mailto:gnso-bylaws-dt-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Steve DelBianco
> *Sent:* Monday, October 10, 2016 2:33 PM
> *To:* Yesim Nazlar; gnso-bylaws-dt at icann.org 
> <mailto:gnso-bylaws-dt at icann.org>
> *Cc:* gnso-secs at icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-bylaws-dt] MP3 and Attendance - GNSO Bylaws 
> Implementation Drafting Team - 10 October 2016
>
> Thanks, all.   Attached is the final table mapping.   To help our GNSO 
> colleagues print this on Letter/A4 paper, I moved staff’s “Additional 
> Comments” into the previous column.   This allowed us to reduce the 
> doc to 29 pages.
>
> Please LMK quickly if you have any corrections to this table.
>
> Working on the revised report now…
>
--------------
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 771 2472987

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-bylaws-dt/attachments/20161011/c04e813d/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GNSO Bylaws DT report [Final 10-Oct] ms.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 923189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-bylaws-dt/attachments/20161011/c04e813d/GNSOBylawsDTreportFinal10-Octms-0001.docx>