[Gnso-bylaws-dt] Reports from the GNSO Bylaws Implementation Drafting Team

Julie Hedlund julie.hedlund at icann.org
Wed Oct 19 15:31:41 UTC 2016


Hi Ed and Steve,

 

That is a placeholder.  My understanding is that the DT does not plan to meet in Hyderabad as it is awaiting the decision of the Council on the motion to approve the report, which is on the Council agenda for its meeting on the 7th.  You should see that slot disappear.

 

Kind regards,

Julie

 

From: <gnso-bylaws-dt-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net>
Date: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 11:26 AM
To: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
Cc: "gnso-bylaws-dt at icann.org" <gnso-bylaws-dt at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-bylaws-dt] Reports from the GNSO Bylaws Implementation Drafting Team

 

Hi Steve,

 

Thanks so much for this and for all of your hard work leading the group.

 

Quick question: On the ICANN schedule it would appear we have 90 minutes to meet Monday morning. I would note that at the same time you and I are scheduled to be on a panel elsewhere. Not the only time, I'm sure, we need to be cloned.

 

I wasn't aware of our plans to meet prior to noting it on the schedule. Is this meeting a real thing or a placeholder we won't be using?

 

Thanks for clarifying.

 

Ed

 

Sent from my iPhone


On 19 Oct 2016, at 14:40, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org> wrote:

Should have sent this out earlier, sorry.    Just a follow-up on last week’s GNSO Council meeting (13-Oct):

 

There was discussion of our DT reports.  Amr, Wolf-Ulrich, and I answered some questions. 

 

Then at least 2 Councilors (Heather Forrest and Marilia Maciel) asked for deferral of the motion until the Hyderabad meeting (7-Nov).  

 

Transcript of Council discussion is here[gnso.icann.org], pages 16-25.

 

Hoping that all of you will be in India so we can explain our report and answer questions from Council — which requires a GNSO Supermajority to approve our recommendations. 

 

—Steve

 

 

 

From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 6:05 PM
To: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>, "gnso-bylaws-dt at icann.org" <gnso-bylaws-dt at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-bylaws-dt] Reports from the GNSO Bylaws Implementation Drafting Team

 

Steve and DT members,

 

Please see below the following message from James Bladel, GNSO Council Chair, on the GNSO Council list pertaining to the submission.

 

Kind regards,

Julie

----------- message from James Bladel ---------------

 

Thank you, Julie.  And please convey our appreciation to Steve and the members of the Drafting Team.

 

Councilors – This will be Agenda Item #5 on tomorrow’s call, so please try to review before then.

 

Thank you,

 

J.

From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
Date: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 8:56 AM
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
Cc: "gnso-bylaws-dt at icann.org" <gnso-bylaws-dt at icann.org>
Subject: Reports from the GNSO Bylaws Implementation Drafting Team 

 

[ICANN Staff — please send this to GNSO Councilors]

 

Dear GNSO Councilors,

 

Please see the attached Bylaws Implementation Drafting Team Report and implementation plan, plus the cover note below from Steve DelBianco, Drafting Team Chair.

 

Kind regards,

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

 

Note from Steve DelBianco:

 

Dear GNSO Councilors,

 

As you may recall, the Bylaws Drafting Team (DT) was created to provide the GNSO Council with a draft implementation plan for any necessary updates to the GNSO Operating Procedures, or possibly the Bylaws as they relate to the GNSO, arising as a result of the revised ICANN Bylaws. The Council requested that this DT submit the proposed implementation plan by 30 September (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20160630-2[gnso.icann.org] for the full Council resolution).

 

At the GNSO Council meeting on 29 September, I requested an additional two weeks to complete the report due to the complexity of the task as well as the short time frame.  Thank you for allowing the DT the additional two weeks to complete this very important task.

 

Please see the attached final report and implementation plan from the DT for GNSO Council consideration on at its meeting on 13 October.  As noted previously, this implementation plan for the Council is not intended to include specific language for new or amended rules and procedures. Drafting of these new or amended processes will therefore likely begin only after approval of the implementation plan.  The understanding is that the initial task of the DT was to identify and agree on how GNSO should handle new obligations and rights arising from the revised ICANN Bylaws.

 

I will be available during the GNSO Council call on the 13th to address any questions you may have concerning this implementation plan.

 

Best regards,

Steve DelBianco

 

_______________________________________________
Gnso-bylaws-dt mailing list
Gnso-bylaws-dt at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-bylaws-dt

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-bylaws-dt/attachments/20161019/846e6bc6/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-bylaws-dt/attachments/20161019/846e6bc6/smime-0001.p7s>


More information about the Gnso-bylaws-dt mailing list