<div dir="ltr">Hi Steve,<div><br></div><div>As to the general report, I think it is too long. Page three has three paragraphs that only capture the opinions of one member or the minority. I think these three paragraphs should be added to the minority report and removed from page three.</div><div><br></div><div>In the report, we should focus on the answers to two questions: Who should speak for GNSO and How should the decisions be made. The first thing we need to say in the report is what our recommendations are for each question. You can, of course, explain the rationale and viewpoints later on in the report but I think you need to have the answers to the questions at the beginning of the report. For example, for question one, there is a conclusion paragraph stating that:</div><div><b><br></b></div><div><b>"DT Conclusion on Question 1:</b> On 21-Sep the DT did a straw poll on the general question of whether Council should speak for GNSO on its new or additional rights and responsibilities under the revised Bylaws. 6 DT members were in favor and three against. While 1/3 is a significant minority whose views could be reflected in our final report, the DT chair moved on to the second general question, assuming that Council was to speak for the GNSO, as described next."</div><div><br></div><div>The above paragraph should be at the beginning of the report and the explanation of minority views in minority report. </div><div><br></div><div>The same applies to the second question: how GNSO council should make decisions. I was a bit lost and could not find the concrete responses to this question ( sorry if I overlooked). We don't have to go into the details of a suggestion that was rejected by the majority (page 5). We just have to at the beginning of the report respond to How and Who questions. Briefly and to the point. </div><div><br></div><div>Thanks a lot for all the work. </div><div><br></div><div>Best </div><div><br></div><div>Farzaneh</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 8 October 2016 at 05:28, Steve DelBianco <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org">sdelbianco@netchoice.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:16px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
Couple of docs here to review before our call on Monday 10-Oct at 13 UTC.</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
<br>
</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
First attachment is updated draft of our report (doc and pdf).</div>
<blockquote style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px;margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px">
<div>1. deleted the last page since we already reflect that discussion on page 3. </div>
<div>2. changed the recommendations page to include a reference to the matrix.</div>
<div>(we also expect that Amr may circulate some edits over the weekend)</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
Second is updated matrix showing specific recommendations (doc and pdf). </div>
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px">
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
1. Split the table row for 4.3 Reconsideration Requests, to show that the GNSO could decide to be a claimant on its own.</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
2. Added Darcy’s suggestions for 25.2 and 26(a)</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
3. Added answer to Darcy question about which EC decisions are covered in Annex D Section 1</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
4. Added Wolf-Ulrich’s suggestion for GNSO Supermajority for Sections 25.2(b), 26(a), and Annex D: 3.1(a), 3.2(a), 3.3(a)</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
5. Added call notes for Sec 6.2 regarding GNSO rep on the EC</div>
<div><font face="Calibri,sans-serif">6. Added call notes for Sec 7.12 — designating <u>Interim</u></font><u style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px"> Directors</u><font face="Calibri,sans-serif"> to fill vacancies created
by EC recall(s)</font></div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
7. note that new bylaw 17.3(d) (regarding CSC Charter) requires a threshold we have not seen before: a simple majority of GNSO Council. ( Do we want to amend that to a majority of each house?</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
8. Added call notes and staff reply for Sec 18.7 (chair of IFR Team) and Sec 19.6 (chair of SCWG). Bylaws say that GNSO names a co-chair from among the 6 GNSO reps. That suggests having Council approve the GNSO co-chair by majority of each house.</div>
</blockquote>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
<br>
</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
On Monday we’ll begin where we left-off, Sec 22.8 on page 16. There are just 23 bylaws sections on the remaining pages, so we’ll easily get through that on our 90-minute call.</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
<br>
</div>
<span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
<div style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:12pt;text-align:left;color:black;BORDER-BOTTOM:medium none;BORDER-LEFT:medium none;PADDING-BOTTOM:0in;PADDING-LEFT:0in;PADDING-RIGHT:0in;BORDER-TOP:#b5c4df 1pt solid;BORDER-RIGHT:medium none;PADDING-TOP:3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span><<a href="mailto:gnso-bylaws-dt-bounces@icann.org">gnso-bylaws-dt-bounces@icann.<wbr>org</a>> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <<a href="mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org">julie.hedlund@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 12:03 PM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>"<a href="mailto:gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org">gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org">gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>[Gnso-bylaws-dt] Actions/Discussion Notes: Bylaws DT Meeting 05 October<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US">
<div class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Dear DT Members,</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Please see below the discussion notes captured by staff from the meeting on 05 October. These high-level notes are designed to help DT members navigate through the content of the call
and are not meant as a substitute for the recording. The recording and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki at:
<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/GBIDT/DT+Meetings">https://community.icann.org/di<wbr>splay/GBIDT/DT+Meetings</a>. The mapping document from Steve DelBianco is attached.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Best regards,</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Julie</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Julie Hedlund, Policy Director</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">GNSO Bylaws Implementation Drafting Team, Wednesday, 05 October 2016 at 1300 UTC</span></b><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Action Items:
<u></u><u></u></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">1. Staff will clarify whether 19.6 Election of Co-Chairs and Liaisons references the same process as for co-chairs as IFRT in 18.7.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">2. Steve D will circulate another version of the report with minor changes. Dropping last page. No objection from Steve M.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">3. DT members will continue to review the mapping document beginning with Section 22.8.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Review the mapping document and note any DT recommendation where DT members would like to argue for a decision threshold that differs from what is indicated in the document.<u></u><u></u></span></i></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Article 4 -- 4.2 & 4.3:<u></u><u></u></span></u></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve M: Surprised in blue. 4.3 B talks about a supporting organization being a claiment -- GNSO on its own initiating reconsideration -- should be green.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve D. 4.3 b -- If GNSO made a decision to be a claimant it would be a majority of each House. What else?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve M.: Probably higher than that. These should be separate. GNSO as part of EC and other GNSO acting on its own.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve D.: 4.2 and 4.3 b -- GNOS rep on EC approve a Reconsideration request -- majority of each House? Or different level? If GNSO itself decides to be a claimant for a
reconsideration request -- what level of support?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Ed Morris: Majority of each House.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve D.: Steve M., supermajority?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve M.: Some type of supermajority.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Poll: How many for higher than majority of each House? 1 - Steve M.; 6 – majority of each House.<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">4.3b <u></u>
<u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Poll: 1 – Steve M. higher; 6 -- majority of each House.<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">4.3(j) -- IRP standing panel -- majority of each House<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Poll: Steve M.: 1-higher; 6 - majority of each House.<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">4.6: Specific Reviews -- Chairs of ACs/SOs select a group of 21 review team members -- each GNSO constituency and SG can nominate and decision to approve 21 members would be presented
to Council to approve. <u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Agreed: 4.6a majority of each House consensus.<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">4.7 Community mediation<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Agreed: Majority of each House. No objections.<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Article 6, section 6.1 -- GNSO representative on the EC. GNSO Council has appointed an interim post -- Council</span></u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"> Chair
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Poll: Majority or supermajority: 1 member -- Steve M; 6 – majority.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Discussion Notes:<u></u><u></u></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Marika: Current way Bylaws are written the assumption is the Chair would take that role unless another was selected. How would you deal with multiple candidates/nominees?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Amr: The Bylaws have referred to the GNSO Council Chair as the GNSO Chair.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Marika: It requires a notification to the ICANN Secretary. Can that happen if there has been no selection? Or does the DT need to make a clarification -- authorized to make
that notification unless the GNSO decides to select another person.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve D.: Not sure we will get to that on this call. First question is when we are nominating -- majority or supermajority.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Poll: Supermajority or greater than simple majority?<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Ed Morris: Simple majority.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Amr: Good with simple majority.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Darcy: Agree.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Farzaneh: Agree.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve M.: Might not get even simple majority for a nominee. Not sure that we need to get into every contingency.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">6.1 Composition and Organization of the EC – Agreed: majority of DT agreed that Council speaks for GNSO and simple majority of each House.<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">6.2 EC Powers – Agreed: Council speaks for GNSO.<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">6.3 EC Administration -- DT recommends that GNSO representative on EC acts through the majority of each House<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Article 7: Board of Directors, Section 7.2 -- majority of each House -- in appointing replacement directors.<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve M.: 7.12 -- Entire Board is recalled. Don't see how that could be simple majority. Support a higher threshold.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Ed Morris: We will be under time pressure to appoint an interim member -- would agree with supermajority if not interim director.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Agreed: Simple majority for interim directors and follow already defined procedures for directors.<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Article 11, Section 11.3: What action needs to happen here?<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Discussion Notes:<u></u><u></u></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Julie H: Need to amend the GNSO Operating Procedures voting threshold.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Marika: Question is whether you want to call out these voting thresholds separately that relate to the EC.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve D.: Could clarify that Council references the GNSO in the Bylaws.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve M.: GNSO cannot amend the Bylaws by itself, nor the Council.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve D.: Staff would come back with amendments to procedures or Bylaws based on the DT recommendations on who and how. DT will want to comment. If in the Bylaws then the
EC has a role in approving. Better if Bylaws said that Council speaks for GNSO.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Amr: If it the consensus of the GNSO to move in that direction. Language in the current Bylaws supports the Council carrying out the duties of the GNSO.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve M.: The point about the Bylaws change is that the GNSO can't change the Bylaws by itself. Don't agree with Amr that there if there is no direct prohibition then the
Council can do it.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Ed Morris: It is a valid point, but not sure that this DT is the one to reconcile this, but maybe when we get to the Council -- may need to ask Legal if we need to amend the
Bylaws. Leave it for Council to decide.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Agreed: DT realizes that some recommendations will be reflected in amendments to the procedures and some in the Bylaws changes. These would then go up for public comment.<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:18.75pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><span>16.2</span></span><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">PTI Governance: Approved by the EC -- GNSO's rep. Majority of each
House.<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Poll: Supermajority or majority?<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Ed Morris: This is a fundamental power. Would prefer a supermajority.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve D.: Anyone else want to raise the threshold?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve M. Supermajority.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Farzi: Supermajority.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Amr: Supermajority.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Darcy: Supermajority.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Wolf-Ulrich: Supermajority.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Agreed: Supermajority.<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">16.3 IANA Naming Functions Contract: EC approves changes to contractual terms. Agreed: Majority of each House.<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">17.1 CSC -- escalate a failure -- EC authorizing instructions. Agreed: Majority of each House.<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Discussion Notes:<u></u><u></u></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve M.: ccNSO and GNSO may address matters escalated by the CSC, pursuant to their operating rules and procedures.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve D.: You are right, not GNSO rep. GNSO Council speaks for GNSO. Majority of each House would decide. Higher threshold? None.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">17.2 CSC Composition, appointment, term, and removal -- GNSO Liaison. Agreed: Council to approve by majority of each House. Current James Gannon.<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">17.3(b) GNSO Council would respond by a majority of each House. Agreed: majority of each House.<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">17.3(c)<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph">
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve M says GNSO can request -- who is empowered to request the formation?
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph">
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve D.: No role on the registries stakeholder group, but there is a role is for recommendation.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">18 IANA Naming Function Reviews (IFRs). Bylaws say supermajority. DT doesn't have to make a recommendation for 18.2. Same for 18.6.<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">18.7 Composition of IFR Review Teams - no role for Council each Constituency and Stakeholder Group would designate its own member.<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Discussion Notes:<u></u><u></u></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Amr -- Q: GNSO SGs need to collectively agree on a uniform process for the nomination and appointment process for IFRT co-chair. A role for Council?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve D. GNSO will have several representatives -- recommend that the representatives from the GNSO will appoint their co-chair.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve M.: Agree.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Amr: Ask for clarification -- GNSO SGs also appointed members to CWG-Accountability -- but GNSO appointed.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve D.: Bylaws say co-chairs selected from among the GNSO representatives. Don't see a need for Council to get involved. Recommend that each GNSO SG designates its member
and GNSO Review Team members will select their co-chair.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">18.12 Special IFR – No action by the DT: required review Bylaws say supermajority approval for comment period request.<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Article 19.4 – No action by the DT: Bylaws references supermajority.<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Article 19.6 Election of co-chairs and liaisons<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Discussion Notes:<u></u><u></u></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph">
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve D.: Suggest simple majority.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph">
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve M.: Why not the same as co-chair of IFRT in 18.7.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Action Item:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"> Staff to clarify whether this section references the same process as for co-chairs as IFRT in 18.7.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Article 22 – Agreed (see DT Draft Report)<u></u><u></u></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve D. Pick up on the next call. Reminder to complete the doodle poll.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve M.: Already covered 22.7.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span>·<span style="font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:'Times New Roman'">
</span></span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Steve D. You are right. Pick up at 22.8 on the next call.</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</span>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri;border-width:1pt medium medium;border-style:solid none none;padding:3pt 0in 0in;border-top-color:rgb(181,196,223)">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span><<a href="mailto:gnso-bylaws-dt-bounces@icann.org">gnso-bylaws-dt-bounces@<wbr>icann.org</a>> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <<a href="mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org">julie.hedlund@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 12:17 PM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>"<a href="mailto:gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org">gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org">gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>[Gnso-bylaws-dt] Action Item re: 19.6 Election of Co-Chairs and Liaisons<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US">
<div class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">Dear DT Members,</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">Per this action item from today’s call:</span> “<span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">Staff will clarify whether 19.6 Election of Co-Chairs and Liaisons references the
same process as for co-chairs as IFRT in 18.7”<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">Please see the attached excerpt from the Bylaws of the full text of Section 19.5 SCWG Composition and Section 19.6 Elections of Co-Chairs and Liaisons. Note that 19.5 states:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">[Begin Excerpt]<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">(a) Each SCWG shall consist of the following members and liaisons to be appointed in accordance with the rules and procedures of the appointing organization:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">(i) Two representatives appointed by the ccNSO from its ccTLD registry operator representatives;<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">(ii) One non-ccNSO ccTLD representative who is associated with a ccTLD registry operator that is not a representative of the ccNSO, appointed by the ccNSO;
it is strongly recommended that the ccNSO consult with the regional ccTLD organizations (i.e., AfTLD, APTLD, LACTLD and CENTR) in making its appointment;<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">(iii) Three representatives appointed by the Registries Stakeholder Group;<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">(iv) One representative appointed by the Registrars Stakeholder Group;<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">(v) One representative appointed by the Commercial Stakeholder Group;<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">(vi) One representative appointed by the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group;<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">[End Excerpt]<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">Furthermore, 19.6 states, “(a) The SCWG shall be led by two co-chairs: one appointed by the GNSO from one of the members appointed pursuant to clauses (iii)-(vi) of Section 19.5(a) and
one appointed by the ccNSO from one of the members appointed pursuant to clauses (i)-(ii) of Section 19.5(a).”<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">The language in 18.7 appears to be the same, as in the following excerpt:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">[Begin Excerpt]<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">Each IFRT shall consist of the following members and liaisons to be appointed in accordance with the rules and procedures of the appointing organization:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">(a) Two representatives appointed by the ccNSO from its ccTLD registry operator representatives;<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">(b) One non-ccNSO ccTLD representative who is associated with a ccTLD registry operator that is not a representative of the ccNSO, appointed by the ccNSO;
it is strongly recommended that the ccNSO consult with the regional ccTLD organizations (i.e., AfTLD, APTLD, LACTLD, and CENTR) in making its appointment;<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">(c) Two representatives appointed by the Registries Stakeholder Group;<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">(d) One representative appointed by the Registrars Stakeholder Group;<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">(e) One representative appointed by the Commercial Stakeholder Group;<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">(f) One representative appointed by the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group;<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">[End Excerpt]<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">Best regards,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">Julie<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">Julie Hedlund, Policy Director</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
<div>
<div bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US">
<div class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224WordSection1">
<p class="m_656334156457638074m_1450726693211414224MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</span>
</div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Gnso-bylaws-dt mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org">Gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-bylaws-dt" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/l<wbr>istinfo/gnso-bylaws-dt</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="m_656334156457638074gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Farzaneh</div>
</div></div>