[gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Revised Draft PDP WG Charter

[Rudi Vansnick]

Dear Chris,

As you said the document drafted by Julie is great and is not easy to improve. All is covered as far as I understand the principles of the duty of the draft team. It is up to the WG to elaborate responses to the given questions and issues. I would let the WG decide if they want to extend the 5 present models. It would require some investigation for us to define a sixth model, that perhaps was already discussed previously and was not withhold.

Interesting sample question ... a lot to discuss but isn't that the duty of the WG ? We are only the charter drafting team ... 

Till later today.

Rudi Vansnick
Chair NPOC Policy Committee - ICANN  - www.npoc.org

Mobile +32/(0)475/28.16.32 - Tel +32/(0)9/329.39.16
rudi.vansnick at isoc.be


Op 22-aug.-2013, om 09:12 heeft "Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk> het volgende geschreven:

> Dear colleagues,
>  
> Julie’s drafting is difficult to improve.
> However, I wonder if it would be good to have a line explicitly indicating that the PDP WG will be free to modify the five alternatives in Section II, effectively creating a sixth one which is recommended/preferred.
>  
> Beyond that my mind is starting to think about translation/transliteration principles for the representation of contact details (rather than notes for so many languages), but that is probably best left to the PDP WG. An example of a principle might be the answer to the question “What happens if there is more than one Romanization (transliteration) for a language in common use?”.
>  
> Looking forward to speaking later,
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Chris.
> --
> Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Dept of Information Studies, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599)ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon
>  
> From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
> Sent: 21 August 2013 20:05
> To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org
> Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Revised Draft PDP WG Charter
> Importance: High
>  
> Dear members of the Charter Drafting Team,
>  
> This is a reminder that per our actions from our meeting that week, attached you will find a revised draft charter for your review and for discussion at our next meeting on Thursday, 22 August  1500 UTC (08:00 PDT, 11:00 EDT, 16:00 London, 17:00 CEST).  The changes are reflected as redlines.  This also is posted on wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/22+August+2013. 
>  
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>  
> Best regards,
> Julie
>  
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg/attachments/20130822/3ffaa176/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg/attachments/20130822/3ffaa176/signature.asc>