[gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

[WUKnoben]

Right. I think it might be more helpful at the beginning to ask for ideas re basic principles to be agreed to guide the cost burden discussion, eg free of charge provision of the information, demand oriented cost etc.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich



From: Dillon, Chris 
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 12:35 PM
To: WUKnoben ; Julie Hedlund ; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org 
Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

Dear Wolf-Ulrich,

 

Thank you for more good points.

 

It sounds as if there may be a case for leaving out the last question in the GAC letter, but it would be good to tell them that we are tasked with the “who should bear the burden” issue.

 

Regards,

 

Chris.

--

Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon

 

From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of WUKnoben
Sent: 31 January 2014 09:40
To: Julie Hedlund; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

 

Dear Julie,

 

I’m fine with the letter in general but I’m not sure whether the last 2 questions are suitable to GAC members – as long as we don’t provide alternative answers (eg registrars, registries, operators...). In particular the very last question seems to be directed to SGs/Cs only.

 

Please don’t understand this as an objection rather than a question.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 

From: Julie Hedlund 

Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:36 PM

To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org 

Subject: FW: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

 

Dear PDP WG members,

 

I have not seen any comments, questions, or changes with respect to the attached letters.  If there are no objections we will send out the letters by the end of this week.

 

Best regards,

 

Julie

 

From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann at icann.org>
Date: Friday, January 24, 2014 10:30 AM
To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

 

Dear all,

Having consulted with our Senior Director for GAC relations, Olof Nordling, I have slightly extended the letter based on his input. In addition, please also find attached a letter that you might want to send out to individual GAC members; you can find the list of current GAC here Representatives - https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/GAC+Representatives. As you see email addresses are provided for both so we could send the letter to those members you might think are most useful.

Many thanks and best wishes,

Lars

 

 

From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 4:32 PM
To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

 

Dear PDP WG members,

 

Per the action items from today's meeting attached are two letters.  One is for the GAC and one is for the other SOs and ACs.  These also are posted to the wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/23+January+2014 under "For Review."  The action is to finalize these letters so that they can be sent by Friday, 31 January.  Please send any comments, questions, or changes to this list by COB Tuesday, 28 January.  Staff will compile the changes and send revised versions for approval by 30 January on the list.

 

Best regards,

 

Julie

 

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg/attachments/20140131/c5912e42/attachment.html>