[gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

[Dillon, Chris]

Dear Julie,

Thank you for your drafting, especially of the burden part. As far as I can see the letters are now ready to go.

Thank you also for amending the agenda. Perhaps we'll have time to OK changes to the questions and definitions we discuss on the list before Thursday.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon

From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>
Date: Friday, 31 January 2014 14:57
To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>, Chris Dillon <c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk<mailto:c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk>>, "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org>" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
Cc: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann at icann.org<mailto:lars.hoffmann at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

Dear Wolf-Ulrich and Chris,

Please see the attached revised letters.  In the GAC version I have deleted the last question and also tried to revised the cost-burden question according to Wolf-Ulrich's suggestion below.  In addition, I have incorporated Jim's changes.

Best regards,
Julie

From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>
Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>
Date: Friday, January 31, 2014 7:11 AM
To: "Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk<mailto:c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk>>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>, "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org>" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

Right. I think it might be more helpful at the beginning to ask for ideas re basic principles to be agreed to guide the cost burden discussion, eg free of charge provision of the information, demand oriented cost etc.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

From: Dillon, Chris<mailto:c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 12:35 PM
To: WUKnoben<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de> ; Julie Hedlund<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org> ; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

Dear Wolf-Ulrich,

Thank you for more good points.

It sounds as if there may be a case for leaving out the last question in the GAC letter, but it would be good to tell them that we are tasked with the “who should bear the burden” issue.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon

From:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of WUKnoben
Sent: 31 January 2014 09:40
To: Julie Hedlund; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

Dear Julie,

I’m fine with the letter in general but I’m not sure whether the last 2 questions are suitable to GAC members – as long as we don’t provide alternative answers (eg registrars, registries, operators...). In particular the very last question seems to be directed to SGs/Cs only.

Please don’t understand this as an objection rather than a question.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

From: Julie Hedlund<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:36 PM
To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: FW: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

Dear PDP WG members,

I have not seen any comments, questions, or changes with respect to the attached letters.  If there are no objections we will send out the letters by the end of this week.

Best regards,

Julie

From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann at icann.org<mailto:lars.hoffmann at icann.org>>
Date: Friday, January 24, 2014 10:30 AM
To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org>" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

Dear all,
Having consulted with our Senior Director for GAC relations, Olof Nordling, I have slightly extended the letter based on his input. In addition, please also find attached a letter that you might want to send out to individual GAC members; you can find the list of current GAC here Representatives - https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/GAC+Representatives. As you see email addresses are provided for both so we could send the letter to those members you might think are most useful.
Many thanks and best wishes,
Lars


From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>
Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 4:32 PM
To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org>" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

Dear PDP WG members,

Per the action items from today's meeting attached are two letters.  One is for the GAC and one is for the other SOs and ACs.  These also are posted to the wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/23+January+2014 under "For Review."  The action is to finalize these letters so that they can be sent by Friday, 31 January.  Please send any comments, questions, or changes to this list by COB Tuesday, 28 January.  Staff will compile the changes and send revised versions for approval by 30 January on the list.

Best regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg/attachments/20140131/c7c385f8/attachment.html>