[gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T activities over the next couple of weeks

[Dillon, Chris]

Thank you, Jim and Petter for your recent emails. (Petter – also for your support for the webinar agenda.)

I think it is important that we answer the second question thoroughly unless we get to a situation where we are completely sure that our recommendation is for transformation not to be mandatory (in which case, as Jim writes, something based on "whoever benefits from the transformation" may be sufficient).

As Petter writes, responses are likely to show us more about the situation. I feel the fact that it is such a difficult question to answer is itself significant. If transformation were to be mandatory we would really need an answer with solid reasoning.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>

From: Petter Rindforth [mailto:petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu]
Sent: 07 January 2015 21:18
To: James Galvin
Cc: Dillon, Chris; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T activities over the next couple of weeks

Dear All,

Wait and see the responses from some of the groups of interest that is curerently working on Comments.

There will be more specific suggestions both on how to deal with the mandatory transformation, as well as to the cost aspect.

Best,
Petter

--
Petter Rindforth, LL M

Fenix Legal KB
Stureplan 4c, 4tr
114 35 Stockholm
Sweden
Fax: +46(0)8-4631010
Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360
E-mail: petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu<mailto:petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu>
www.fenixlegal.eu<http://www.fenixlegal.eu>


NOTICE
This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail.
Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu<http://www.fenixlegal.eu>
Thank you

7 januari 2015, James Galvin <jgalvin at afilias.info<mailto:jgalvin at afilias.info>> skrev:

Chris,

Since our main recommendation is not to propose mandatory transformation, would you please clarify if you are proposing a work item for us?

Speaking for myself, given that I'm not in favor of mandatory transformation I'd find it difficult to discuss who should bear the cost of transformation. Since it's not part of the "system" then the only possible answer is something or someone outside the system, which could reasonably be characterized by the phrase "whoever benefits from the transformation".

My question is, if we are to talk about who bears the cost, what is the basis on which we could evaluate possible responses?

Jim

On 1/7/15 8:12 AM, Dillon, Chris wrote:
Dear colleagues,

Happy New Year!

As there have been no public comments so far, I would like to cancel our
meetings tomorrow (Jan. 8) and on Jan. 15, and have a webinar on Monday
19th at 15:00 UTC (tentative date/time).

The current agenda for the webinar is at the bottom of this email. You
are most welcome to make suggestions for improving it by 23:59 UTC
tomorrow Jan. 8.

Two other things:

*1. Face-to-face meeting in Singapore*

The current intention is to have a closed meeting, use Doodle to
maximize attendance and invite people from outside the WG.

*2. Charter question 2*

Especially if our main recommendation were to change to pro-mandatory
transformation, we would need a detailed answer to the second question
in our charter:

"Who should decide who should bear the burden [of] translating contact
information to a single common language or transliterating contact
information to a single common script."

Answers that have come up during our discussions have included:

- Registrants, registrars and/or registries

- Whoever benefits from the provision of a transformation service

More detailed suggestions are welcome and would be likely to strengthen
the case for mandatory transformation.

With all good wishes for 2015,

Regards,

Chris.

*Draft webinar agenda*

1. Welcome

2. Background to the WG

3. Discussion in the Group

a. SO/AC outreach and feedback

b. Gathering of arguments

c. Straw man

d. Initial Report without consensus call

4. Recommendations

a. #1-#6

b. Pertinence of Charter question 2

5. Next steps

a. Public Comment Period

b. Face-to-face meeting in Singapore

c. Time line for Final Report

6. AOB

a. WG open to everybody

b. Confirmation of next call

c. Q&A

--

Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital
Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int
31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>
<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg/attachments/20150108/d4f42ddb/attachment.html>