From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Mon Jun 1 06:53:13 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 06:53:13 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Special meeting on final report recommendations: Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group Tuesday, 02 June 2015 at 13:00 UTC Message-ID: Dear colleagues, This is a reminder about tomorrow's special meeting (at Tuesday 2 June at 13:00 UTC) on recommendations for the T&T final report. Please find the latest version of the draft final report updated in the light of last Thursday's meeting attached. Tomorrow's meeting is also an opportunity for members who usually have other commitments during our regular Thursday meetings to take part. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: owner-ntfy-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-ntfy-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of Terri Agnew Sent: 28 May 2015 21:52 To: ntfy-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org Subject: [ntfy-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Meeting Invitation: Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group Tuesday, 02 June 2015 at 13:00 UTC Dear All, The next Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group teleconference is scheduled for Tuesday, 02 June 2015 at 1300 UTC 06:00 PDT, 09:00 EDT, 14:00 London, 15:00 CET For other places see: http://tinyurl.com/nay9685 A calendar invitation will be sent shortly after this email. If you do not receive it, please download the ical invitation attached to this email. Adobe Connect room Mailing list archives Wiki page The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page The dial-in details are below - please let me know if you require a dial-out. Please confirm your dial-out requests GNSO Secretariats gnso-secs at icann.org _____________________________________________________________________ Participant passcode: CONTACT Dial in numbers: Country Toll Numbers Freephone/ Toll Free Number ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 BRAZIL 55-11-3958-0779 0800-7610651 CHILE 1230-020-2863 CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4789 10800-120-1670 COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 CROATIA 080-08-06-309 CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 ESTONIA 800-011-1093 FINLAND 358-9-5424-7162 0-800-9-14610 FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 HUNGARY 36-1-700-8856 06-800-12755 INDIA BANGALORE: 91-80-61275204 INDIA MUMBAI: 91-22-61501629 INDIA INDIA A: 000-800-852-1268 INDIA INDIA B: 000-800-001-6305 INDIA INDIA C: 1800-300-00491 INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 ITALY MILAN: 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 ITALY ROME: 39-06-8751-6018 800-986-383 ITALY TORINO: 39-011-510-0118 800-986-383 JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7878-2631 0066-33-132439 JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-6868-2631 0066-33-132439 LATVIA 8000-3185 LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 8002-9246 MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 MEXICO GUADALAJARA (JAL): 52-33-3208-7310 001-866-376-9696 MEXICO MEXICO CITY: 52-55-5062-9110 001-866-376-9696 MEXICO MONTERREY: 52-81-2482-0610 001-866-376-9696 NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 PANAMA 011-001-800-5072065 PERU 0800-53713 PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 1800-111-42453 POLAND 00-800-1212572 PORTUGAL 8008-14052 ROMANIA 40-31-630-01-79 RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 SAUDI ARABIA 800-8-110087 SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 0800-002066 SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 TURKEY 00-800-151-0516 UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 8000-35702370 UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Translation and Transliteration Contact Information PDP WG 02 Jun3 2015.ics Type: text/calendar Size: 88163 bytes Desc: Translation and Transliteration Contact Information PDP WG 02 Jun3 2015.ics URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Draft_Final_V4.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 452231 bytes Desc: Draft_Final_V4.docx URL: From nathalie.peregrine at icann.org Tue Jun 2 16:57:34 2015 From: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org (Nathalie Peregrine) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 16:57:34 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] MP3 Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG meeting 2 June 2015 Message-ID: Dear All, Please find the MP3 recording for the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group call held on Tuesday 2 June 2015 at 13:00 UTC at: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-transliteration-contact-02jun15-en.mp3 On page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#jun The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page:http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar Attendees: Chris Dillon ? NCSG Sara Bockey ? RrSG Ubolthip Sethakaset ? Individual Amr Elsadr ? NCUC Peter Green (Zhang Zuan) ? NCUC Justine Chew ? Individual Jim Galvin - RySG Apologies: Petter Rindforth ? IPC Wen Zhai - ICANN Staff Julie Hedlund Lars Hoffmann Glen de St Gery Nathalie Peregrine ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Wiki page: http://tinyurl.com/mpwxstx Thank you. Kind regards, Nathalie Adobe Chat Transcript for Tuesday 2 June 2015: Nathalie Peregrine:Welcome to the Translation and Transliteration PDP Working Group on Thursday, 2nd June 2015 Jim Galvin:hi ... dialing in now Jim Galvin:and now on the line Jim Galvin:no problem waiting a bit longer given the special time Rudi Vansnick:indeed, sometimes Adobe is not willing to allow you to conect Chris Dillon:But we love it really Justine Chew:Hello, are we short on participants? Chris Dillon:A little, but I'm not for giving up Peter Green (CONAC):Hi Sorry for being late Lars Hoffmann:i agree with Jim that the *could* should go. Lars Hoffmann:also it will become 'preliminary' should be taken off. Rudi Vansnick:i would also prefer to remove "could" but I'm not a native english speaker Rudi Vansnick:unlikely to exist soon : do not forget the timing of this report being approved is approx a few months from now ... Rudi Vansnick:at their own expense ... Sara Bockey:Is statement "consistency would be an issue" truly necessary. If we are recommending it is not desirable and at the requesters expense, and not public, is this last sentence necessary? Amr Elsadr:Apologies for being late. Had another meeting that ran longer than expected. Justine Chew 2:Any parties requiring SUCH transformation are free to do it ad hoc outside the Whois replacement system at their own expense while ensuring their exercise meets their exact transformation requirements. Amr Elsadr:If our recommendations are meant to be implemented immediately, there's no need to really describe it as the "whois replacement". Lars Hoffmann:@jim +1 Amr Elsadr:Agree with Jim. Sara Bockey:@Jim +1 Jim Galvin:Could be numbers for example. Amr Elsadr:"supported by" is what I'm seeing in the AC room. Amr Elsadr:Would we like to pluralize "language or script" in rec #3? Rudi Vansnick:at the end it is the registrar who offers a platform (form) for registration based on their knowledge of languages Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: +1 Sara Bockey:Yes, it seems to go against universal acceptance a bit Amr Elsadr:@Chris: That sounds good to me. :) Amr Elsadr:@Chris: +1 Jim Galvin:I understand the desire to "protect" registrars from the requirement that they might have to support all languages and scripts. Jim Galvin:I think that might be part of what is hidden in this recommendation. I'm wondering if we could say it differently, although I don't have a suggestion offhand which is why I was inclined to drop it. Amr Elsadr:@Jim: Yes..., a requirement to support all languages/scripts would be especially burdensome on local up and coming registrars trying to serve their local communities. Amr Elsadr:..., which would probably also be reflected on the registrants paying for the services they are (or aren't) receiving. Amr Elsadr:Not a suspicion. It's a bottom line. Registrars are businesses, not charities. :) Jim Galvin:+1 chris Jim Galvin:do we mean "consistent" or "self-consistent"? Justine Chew 2:what about "identified"? Amr Elsadr:For the record, I'm fine with "tagged". Jim Galvin:I'm also fine with tagged. Amr Elsadr:@Jim: Not sure what you mean by self-consistent? Amr Elsadr:Consistency is an RAA requirement. Response consistency was also an issue addressed by the "thick" whois PDP in that context. Amr Elsadr:Consistency in the RAA is against standards made clear in the 2013 RAA. Justine Chew 2:@Jim: I think the term "self-consistent" has a less clear meaning than "consistent" Jim Galvin:If that's our definition of consistency we should say that. I'm thinking a footnote that "defines" consistency is needed. Amr Elsadr:@Jim: +1. Sounds good. Rudi Vansnick:@Jim : +1 Justine Chew 2:Fine with me. Rudi Vansnick:so 1 to 4 : closed discssion ? Rudi Vansnick:ok Jim Galvin:@Amr +1 Rudi Vansnick:just something that comes to my mind : rec#1 : how could one see the registrar has transformed the contact data at their own expense ? Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: That's an interesting question. The registrant could submit a second set of transformed data that the registrar can display. Sara Bockey:Does rec #5 run against rec #3? Registrant is not necessarily providing local script, but script supported by the registrar Jim Galvin:Going back to Amr's original point, what needs to happen is we need to know what is the "original authoritative data". Jim Galvin:Then all other data is "transformed", it needs to be flagged as such, and the source of the transformation needs to be noted. Amr Elsadr:@Jim: +1. Pointing out the authoritative set would eliminate the concern behind who transformed the second set of data. Jim Galvin:So the display is "two blocks" of the same data, flagged appropriately. Jim Galvin:@Amr - there's not necessarily a concern about who transformed the data but I think it would be useful to know the source. Rudi Vansnick:@Jim : +1 Amr Elsadr:@Jim: Yes. Although the source of the transformation is helpful, do we want to recommend a contractual requirement to display this? This is porbably a question the WG needs to answer. Sara Bockey:@Amr - agree Jim Galvin:@Amr - additional discussion would be good. I think it would be helpful but would like to hear other points of view Amr Elsadr:I agree that it "might" be helpful. It does not necessarily guarantee any added accuracy, though. This depends on the arbitrary ability of whoever is performing the transformation. Sara Bockey:thank you everyone! Jim Galvin:bye thanks all Rudi Vansnick:thanks a lot Chris Amr Elsadr:Thanks all. Bye. Peter Green (CONAC):bye all Chris Dillon:Many thanks and goodbye till Thursday. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Wed Jun 3 13:35:58 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 13:35:58 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] [ntfy-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Meeting Invitation: Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group Thursday 4 June 2015 at 13:00 UTC Message-ID: Dear colleagues, Please find below the draft agenda for tomorrow's special meeting on recommendations for the final report: Draft agenda 1. Welcome 2. Roll call 3. Statements of interest 4. Draft final report v4.2 (especially recommendations p.17-18) 5. Date of next meeting 6. AOB Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From aelsadr at egyptig.org Thu Jun 4 12:00:17 2015 From: aelsadr at egyptig.org (Amr Elsadr) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 14:00:17 +0200 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Re: [ntfy-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Meeting Invitation: Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group Thursday, 04 June 2015 at 13:00 UTC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <98BA5A07-F249-41C2-8009-B460896F9449@egyptig.org> Hi, I need to apologise for not being able to make today?s call. Thanks. Amr On Jun 3, 2015, at 4:20 PM, Nathalie Peregrine wrote: > Dear All, > > The next Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group teleconference is scheduled for Thursday, 04 June 2015 at 1300 UTC > 06:00 PDT, 09:00 EDT, 14:00 London, 15:00 CET > For other places see: http://tinyurl.com/o5vwh6b > A calendar invitation will be sent shortly after this email. If you do not receive it, please download the ical invitation attached to this email. > Adobe Connect room > Mailing list archives > Wiki page > The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page > The dial-in details are below - please let me know if you require a dial-out. > Please confirm your dial-out requests > GNSO Secretariats gnso-secs at icann.org > > _____________________________________________________________________ > Participant passcode: CONTACT > Dial in numbers: > Country > > Toll Numbers > Freephone/ > Toll Free Number > ARGENTINA > > > > > > 0800-777-0519 > > AUSTRALIA > > ADELAIDE: > > 61-8-8121-4842 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > BRISBANE: > > 61-7-3102-0944 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > CANBERRA: > > 61-2-6100-1944 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > MELBOURNE: > > 61-3-9010-7713 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > PERTH: > > 61-8-9467-5223 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > SYDNEY: > > 61-2-8205-8129 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRIA > > > > 43-1-92-81-113 > > 0800-005-259 > > BELGIUM > > > > 32-2-400-9861 > > 0800-3-8795 > > BRAZIL > > > > 55-11-3958-0779 > > 0800-7610651 > > CHILE > > > > > > 1230-020-2863 > > CHINA > > CHINA A: > > 86-400-810-4789 > > 10800-712-1670 > > CHINA > > CHINA B: > > 86-400-810-4789 > > 10800-120-1670 > > COLOMBIA > > > > > > 01800-9-156474 > > CROATIA > > > > > > 080-08-06-309 > > CZECH REPUBLIC > > > > 420-2-25-98-56-64 > > 800-700-177 > > DENMARK > > > > 45-7014-0284 > > 8088-8324 > > ESTONIA > > > > > > 800-011-1093 > > FINLAND > > > > 358-9-5424-7162 > > 0-800-9-14610 > > FRANCE > > LYON: > > 33-4-26-69-12-85 > > 080-511-1496 > > FRANCE > > MARSEILLE: > > 33-4-86-06-00-85 > > 080-511-1496 > > FRANCE > > PARIS: > > 33-1-70-70-60-72 > > 080-511-1496 > > GERMANY > > > > 49-69-2222-20362 > > 0800-664-4247 > > GREECE > > > > 30-80-1-100-0687 > > 00800-12-7312 > > HONG KONG > > > > 852-3001-3863 > > 800-962-856 > > HUNGARY > > > > 36-1-700-8856 > > 06-800-12755 > > INDIA > > BANGALORE: > > 91-80-61275204 > > INDIA > > MUMBAI: > > 91-22-61501629 > > INDIA > > INDIA A: > > > > 000-800-852-1268 > > INDIA > > INDIA B: > > > > 000-800-001-6305 > > INDIA > > INDIA C: > > > > 1800-300-00491 > > INDONESIA > > > > > > 001-803-011-3982 > > IRELAND > > > > 353-1-246-7646 > > 1800-992-368 > > ISRAEL > > > > > > 1-80-9216162 > > ITALY > > MILAN: > > 39-02-3600-6007 > > 800-986-383 > > ITALY > > ROME: > > 39-06-8751-6018 > > 800-986-383 > > ITALY > > TORINO: > > 39-011-510-0118 > > 800-986-383 > > JAPAN > > OSAKA: > > 81-6-7878-2631 > > 0066-33-132439 > > JAPAN > > TOKYO: > > 81-3-6868-2631 > > 0066-33-132439 > > LATVIA > > > > > > 8000-3185 > > LUXEMBOURG > > > > 352-27-000-1364 > > 8002-9246 > > MALAYSIA > > > > > > 1-800-81-3065 > > MEXICO > > GUADALAJARA (JAL): > > 52-33-3208-7310 > > 001-866-376-9696 > > MEXICO > > MEXICO CITY: > > 52-55-5062-9110 > > 001-866-376-9696 > > MEXICO > > MONTERREY: > > 52-81-2482-0610 > > 001-866-376-9696 > > NETHERLANDS > > > > 31-20-718-8588 > > 0800-023-4378 > > NEW ZEALAND > > > > 64-9-970-4771 > > 0800-447-722 > > NORWAY > > > > 47-21-590-062 > > 800-15157 > > PANAMA > > > > > > 011-001-800-5072065 > > PERU > > > > > > 0800-53713 > > PHILIPPINES > > > > 63-2-858-3716 > > 1800-111-42453 > > POLAND > > > > > > 00-800-1212572 > > PORTUGAL > > > > > > 8008-14052 > > ROMANIA > > > > 40-31-630-01-79 > > RUSSIA > > > > > > 8-10-8002-0144011 > > SAUDI ARABIA > > > > > > 800-8-110087 > > SINGAPORE > > > > 65-6883-9230 > > 800-120-4663 > > SLOVAK REPUBLIC > > > > 421-2-322-422-25 > > 0800-002066 > > SOUTH AFRICA > > > > > > 080-09-80414 > > SOUTH KOREA > > > > 82-2-6744-1083 > > 00798-14800-7352 > > SPAIN > > > > 34-91-414-25-33 > > 800-300-053 > > SWEDEN > > > > 46-8-566-19-348 > > 0200-884-622 > > SWITZERLAND > > > > 41-44-580-6398 > > 0800-120-032 > > TAIWAN > > > > 886-2-2795-7379 > > 00801-137-797 > > THAILAND > > > > > > 001-800-1206-66056 > > TURKEY > > > > > > 00-800-151-0516 > > UNITED ARAB EMIRATES > > > > > > 8000-35702370 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > BIRMINGHAM: > > 44-121-210-9025 > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > GLASGOW: > > 44-141-202-3225 > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > LEEDS: > > 44-113-301-2125 > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > LONDON: > > 44-20-7108-6370 > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > MANCHESTER: > > 44-161-601-1425 > > 0808-238-6029 > > URUGUAY > > > > > > 000-413-598-3421 > > USA > > > > 1-517-345-9004 > > 866-692-5726 > > VENEZUELA > > > > > > 0800-1-00-3702 > > > Thank you. > Kind regards, > Terri Agnew > > > > From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Thu Jun 4 11:58:08 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 11:58:08 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Re: [ntfy-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Meeting Invitation: Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group Thursday, 04 June 2015 at 13:00 UTC In-Reply-To: <98BA5A07-F249-41C2-8009-B460896F9449@egyptig.org> References: <98BA5A07-F249-41C2-8009-B460896F9449@egyptig.org> Message-ID: Dear Amr, Sorry you can't make it. Your apology is noted. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr Sent: 04 June 2015 13:00 To: Nathalie Peregrine Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Re: [ntfy-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Meeting Invitation: Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group Thursday, 04 June 2015 at 13:00 UTC Hi, I need to apologise for not being able to make today's call. Thanks. Amr On Jun 3, 2015, at 4:20 PM, Nathalie Peregrine wrote: > Dear All, > > The next Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP > Working Group teleconference is scheduled for Thursday, 04 June 2015 > at 1300 UTC > 06:00 PDT, 09:00 EDT, 14:00 London, 15:00 CET For other places see: > http://tinyurl.com/o5vwh6b A calendar invitation will be sent shortly > after this email. If you do not receive it, please download the ical invitation attached to this email. > Adobe Connect room > Mailing list archives > Wiki page > The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO > Master Calendar page The dial-in details are below - please let me know if you require a dial-out. > Please confirm your dial-out requests > GNSO Secretariats gnso-secs at icann.org > > _____________________________________________________________________ > Participant passcode: CONTACT > Dial in numbers: > Country > > Toll Numbers > Freephone/ > Toll Free Number > ARGENTINA > > > > > > 0800-777-0519 > > AUSTRALIA > > ADELAIDE: > > 61-8-8121-4842 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > BRISBANE: > > 61-7-3102-0944 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > CANBERRA: > > 61-2-6100-1944 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > MELBOURNE: > > 61-3-9010-7713 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > PERTH: > > 61-8-9467-5223 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > SYDNEY: > > 61-2-8205-8129 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRIA > > > > 43-1-92-81-113 > > 0800-005-259 > > BELGIUM > > > > 32-2-400-9861 > > 0800-3-8795 > > BRAZIL > > > > 55-11-3958-0779 > > 0800-7610651 > > CHILE > > > > > > 1230-020-2863 > > CHINA > > CHINA A: > > 86-400-810-4789 > > 10800-712-1670 > > CHINA > > CHINA B: > > 86-400-810-4789 > > 10800-120-1670 > > COLOMBIA > > > > > > 01800-9-156474 > > CROATIA > > > > > > 080-08-06-309 > > CZECH REPUBLIC > > > > 420-2-25-98-56-64 > > 800-700-177 > > DENMARK > > > > 45-7014-0284 > > 8088-8324 > > ESTONIA > > > > > > 800-011-1093 > > FINLAND > > > > 358-9-5424-7162 > > 0-800-9-14610 > > FRANCE > > LYON: > > 33-4-26-69-12-85 > > 080-511-1496 > > FRANCE > > MARSEILLE: > > 33-4-86-06-00-85 > > 080-511-1496 > > FRANCE > > PARIS: > > 33-1-70-70-60-72 > > 080-511-1496 > > GERMANY > > > > 49-69-2222-20362 > > 0800-664-4247 > > GREECE > > > > 30-80-1-100-0687 > > 00800-12-7312 > > HONG KONG > > > > 852-3001-3863 > > 800-962-856 > > HUNGARY > > > > 36-1-700-8856 > > 06-800-12755 > > INDIA > > BANGALORE: > > 91-80-61275204 > > INDIA > > MUMBAI: > > 91-22-61501629 > > INDIA > > INDIA A: > > > > 000-800-852-1268 > > INDIA > > INDIA B: > > > > 000-800-001-6305 > > INDIA > > INDIA C: > > > > 1800-300-00491 > > INDONESIA > > > > > > 001-803-011-3982 > > IRELAND > > > > 353-1-246-7646 > > 1800-992-368 > > ISRAEL > > > > > > 1-80-9216162 > > ITALY > > MILAN: > > 39-02-3600-6007 > > 800-986-383 > > ITALY > > ROME: > > 39-06-8751-6018 > > 800-986-383 > > ITALY > > TORINO: > > 39-011-510-0118 > > 800-986-383 > > JAPAN > > OSAKA: > > 81-6-7878-2631 > > 0066-33-132439 > > JAPAN > > TOKYO: > > 81-3-6868-2631 > > 0066-33-132439 > > LATVIA > > > > > > 8000-3185 > > LUXEMBOURG > > > > 352-27-000-1364 > > 8002-9246 > > MALAYSIA > > > > > > 1-800-81-3065 > > MEXICO > > GUADALAJARA (JAL): > > 52-33-3208-7310 > > 001-866-376-9696 > > MEXICO > > MEXICO CITY: > > 52-55-5062-9110 > > 001-866-376-9696 > > MEXICO > > MONTERREY: > > 52-81-2482-0610 > > 001-866-376-9696 > > NETHERLANDS > > > > 31-20-718-8588 > > 0800-023-4378 > > NEW ZEALAND > > > > 64-9-970-4771 > > 0800-447-722 > > NORWAY > > > > 47-21-590-062 > > 800-15157 > > PANAMA > > > > > > 011-001-800-5072065 > > PERU > > > > > > 0800-53713 > > PHILIPPINES > > > > 63-2-858-3716 > > 1800-111-42453 > > POLAND > > > > > > 00-800-1212572 > > PORTUGAL > > > > > > 8008-14052 > > ROMANIA > > > > 40-31-630-01-79 > > RUSSIA > > > > > > 8-10-8002-0144011 > > SAUDI ARABIA > > > > > > 800-8-110087 > > SINGAPORE > > > > 65-6883-9230 > > 800-120-4663 > > SLOVAK REPUBLIC > > > > 421-2-322-422-25 > > 0800-002066 > > SOUTH AFRICA > > > > > > 080-09-80414 > > SOUTH KOREA > > > > 82-2-6744-1083 > > 00798-14800-7352 > > SPAIN > > > > 34-91-414-25-33 > > 800-300-053 > > SWEDEN > > > > 46-8-566-19-348 > > 0200-884-622 > > SWITZERLAND > > > > 41-44-580-6398 > > 0800-120-032 > > TAIWAN > > > > 886-2-2795-7379 > > 00801-137-797 > > THAILAND > > > > > > 001-800-1206-66056 > > TURKEY > > > > > > 00-800-151-0516 > > UNITED ARAB EMIRATES > > > > > > 8000-35702370 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > BIRMINGHAM: > > 44-121-210-9025 > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > GLASGOW: > > 44-141-202-3225 > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > LEEDS: > > 44-113-301-2125 > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > LONDON: > > 44-20-7108-6370 > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > MANCHESTER: > > 44-161-601-1425 > > 0808-238-6029 > > URUGUAY > > > > > > 000-413-598-3421 > > USA > > > > 1-517-345-9004 > > 866-692-5726 > > VENEZUELA > > > > > > 0800-1-00-3702 > > > Thank you. > Kind regards, > Terri Agnew > > > > From nathalie.peregrine at icann.org Thu Jun 4 17:21:37 2015 From: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org (Nathalie Peregrine) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 17:21:37 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] MP3 Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG meeting 4 June 2015 Message-ID: Dear All, Please find the MP3 recording for the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group call held on Thursday 4 June 2015 at 13:00 UTC at: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-transliteration-contact-04jun15-en.mp3 On page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#jun The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page:http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar Attendees: Chris Dillon ? NCSG Sara Bockey ? RrSG Amr Elsadr ? NCUC Justine Chew ? Individual Jim Galvin - RySG Petter Rindforth ? IPC Rudi Vansnick - NPOC Roger Carney - RrSG Peter Green (Zhang Zuan) ? NCUC Apologies: Lindsay Hamilton-Reid Wen Zhai - RySG Amr Elsadr - NCUC ICANN Staff Julie Hedlund Lars Hoffmann Nathalie Peregrine ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Wiki page: http://tinyurl.com/mpwxstx Thank you. Kind regards, Nathalie Adobe Chat Transcript for Thursday 4 June 2015: Nathalie Peregrine:Dear all, welcome to the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG call on the 4th June 2015 Lars Hoffmann:Hello everybody - just dialing in now. Chris Dillon:Hello Lars & everyone! Peter Dernbach:Hello all. Nathalie Peregrine:Noted, thank you! Lars Hoffmann:document is not un-synched. Lars Hoffmann:*now Jim Galvin:Rec #4 - "through the help of language tags" I suggest should be "through the help of language *and script" tags". Jim Galvin:RDAP is a protocol. It does not store. Rudi Vansnick:RFC 7480 if i'm not wrong Jim Galvin:Yes, that wors Jim Galvin:^wors^works Justine Chew:Is RDAP spelt out anywhere earlier in the report? Justine Chew:*Sorry, haven't had time to look at this V4-2* Rudi Vansnick:@Justine: a reference to that will be put (footnote or somewhere else) Lars Hoffmann:*justine - i beleive it is spelled out. Jim Galvin:However, instead of RDAP maybe we should use "WHOIS replacement system". Jim Galvin:well, you know what the script could be, since it's not necessarily unique and unambiguous. Jim Galvin:Some languages are supported by multiple scripts. I think this is solveable algorithmically. Not absolutely certain yet but others have told me this should be the case. Nathalie Peregrine:Please all mute your phones and mics when not speaking Petter Rindforth:Just so that we are clear. If changing a word in one plce it has to be fully replaced Jim Galvin:I guess what I'm saying is +1 Lars. Withdraw comment to add "scripts" to example. Peter Green (CONAC):Sorry, again being late Rudi Vansnick:RDAP is more in the IETF field while WHOIS is more recognised in ICANN Jim Galvin:Rec 6 - again - RDAP to WHOIS Replacement System. Rudi Vansnick:@Jim: +1 Jim Galvin:and probably "database" to "database system" Jim Galvin:"database" comment is "rec #7" Rudi Vansnick:store works for database / database system Jim Galvin:Would we consider a "Finding" as opposed to a "non-recommendation"? Truly just a question. Petter Rindforth:I suggest "should lie" to be changed to "may lie" Jim Galvin:I would prefer we be more specific with the statement. So, I prefer "should" to "may" Rudi Vansnick:@Jim: +1 Roger Carney:@Jim +1 Peter Dernbach:But in Recommendation #5 we consider that registrars may wish to perform transofrmation. In those cases there may not be a "requestor." Jim Galvin:Wouldn't the registrar be the requestor in that case? Jim Galvin:Rather than being "moot", why don't we answer the question regardless and call it a recommendation? Rudi Vansnick:thanks LArs Peter Dernbach:I would suggest that "Non-Recommendation 8" become a "Finding" and we just leave the first sentence in the current draft, deleting the second sentence (currently in red). Jim Galvin:@peter - agree with Peter because the sentence is actually already in Rec #1. Lars Hoffmann:also could be ust 'transformation lies with' ... Peter Dernbach:I think that also exceeds the scope of our charter, which was to determine who should decide who bears the burden, not to decide who bears the burden. Peter Dernbach:I appreciate, though, that this is a minority opinion. Peter Dernbach:but we are making that suggestion in recommendation 1 Jim Galvin:@lars - +1 Lars Hoffmann:we can also just call it :finding in relation to charter question 2' Peter Dernbach:@Lars +1 Sara Bockey:Could we just delete Non-Recommendation and have it just be a new paragraph stating: Based on recommendations 1-7... Rudi Vansnick:just avoid transformation is done without the approval of the registrant engaging the registrant in an eventual legal action Jim Galvin:Even the second RDAP shoudl be "whois replacement system" Jim Galvin:@chris +1 Rudi Vansnick:+1 Rudi Vansnick:we did Chris Rudi Vansnick:? what standards ? Rudi Vansnick:i think so Lars Hoffmann:http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-07apr11-en.pdf Rudi Vansnick:great work done Peter Dernbach:Thank you Chris, Lars and all! Jim Galvin:thanks! bye all! Sara Bockey:thank you everyone Rudi Vansnick:have a nice day Petter Rindforth:The same Chris Dillon:Brilliant sunshine in London for once -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lars.hoffmann at icann.org Fri Jun 5 06:50:29 2015 From: lars.hoffmann at icann.org (Lars Hoffmann) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 06:50:29 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Version 4.4 and next steps Message-ID: Dear all, Please find attached Version 4.4 ? which is a clean copy of V4.3 with the edits in redline that followed from yesterday?s call. In addition, below you find the suggested timetable that was presented on yesterday?s call to bring this PDP WG to a conclusion by next Friday. Please note that the first deadline is this coming Monday at 23:00 UTC! Many thanks and best wishes, Lars ? T&T PDP WG Final Steps Deadline to submit Final Report to GNSO Council in time for Buenos Aires: Sunday 14 June 2015 Thursday 4 June 2015 15:00 UTC Working Group Meeting Monday 8 June 23:59 UTC Final deadline for substantive edits ? excluding recommendations Tuesday 9 June 09:00 UTC Circulation of new draft of Final Report (including Executive Summary) Tuesday 9 June 13:00 UTC Working Group Meeting Tuesday 9 June 23:59 UTC Final deadline for substantive edits to recommendations Wednesday 10 June 2015 09:00 UTC Circulate Final Report to Group and consensus call on the mailing list Thursday 11 June 12:00 UTC Deadline for consensus call on list Thursday 11 June 15:00 UTC Final Working Group meeting to explain next steps and answer any procedural question Friday 12 June 4 12:00 UTC Publication of Final Report on GNSO website and to GNSO Council mailing list Staff to work with Council liaison on motion to submit to Council by Sunday 14 June 2015 23:59 UTC. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Draft_Final_V4-4.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 481725 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5091 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lars.hoffmann at icann.org Mon Jun 8 06:46:08 2015 From: lars.hoffmann at icann.org (Lars Hoffmann) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 06:46:08 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Reminder: Edits Due Today Message-ID: Dear all, Just a quick reminder that if you have any proposed edits to the Final Report, please submit them to this list by 23:59 UTC (other times ) today. The latest version of the Report is attached. Thank you and have a great week. Lars -- T&T PDP WG Final Steps Deadline to submit Final Report to GNSO Council in time for Buenos Aires: Sunday 14 June 2015 Monday 8 June 23:59 UTC Final deadline for substantive edits ? excluding recommendations Tuesday 9 June 09:00 UTC Circulation of new draft of Final Report (including Executive Summary) Tuesday 9 June 13:00 UTC Working Group Meeting Tuesday 9 June 23:59 UTC Final deadline for substantive edits to recommendations Wednesday 10 June 2015 09:00 UTC Circulate Final Report to Group and consensus call on the mailing list Thursday 11 June 12:00 UTC Deadline for consensus call on list Thursday 11 June 15:00 UTC Final Working Group meeting to explain next steps and answer any procedural question Friday 12 June 4 12:00 UTC Publication of Final Report on GNSO website and to GNSO Council mailing list Staff to work with Council liaison on motion to submit to Council by Sunday 14 June 2015 23:59 UTC. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Draft_Final_V4-4.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 481725 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5091 bytes Desc: not available URL: From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Tue Jun 9 08:20:40 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 08:20:40 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T Last editing telephone meeting - today 13:00 UTC Message-ID: Dear colleagues, Please find the draft agenda for today's meeting below: Draft agenda 1. Welcome 2. Roll call 3. Statements of interest 4. Draft final report v5.1 (especially recommendations p.19-20) 5. Next steps and procedures 6. AOB It includes the latest version of the draft final report. Please note that today is scheduled to be our last editing meeting. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon The next Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group teleconference is scheduled for Tuesday, 09 June 2015 at 1300 UTC 06:00 PDT, 09:00 EDT, 14:00 London, 15:00 CET For other places see: http://tinyurl.com/objugrv A calendar invitation will be sent shortly after this email. If you do not receive it, please download the ical invitation attached to this email. Adobe Connect room Mailing list archives Wiki page The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page The dial-in details are below - please let me know if you require a dial-out. Please confirm your dial-out requests GNSO Secretariats gnso-secs at icann.org _____________________________________________________________________ Participant passcode: CONTACT Dial in numbers: Country Toll Numbers Freephone/ Toll Free Number ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 BRAZIL 55-11-3958-0779 0800-7610651 CHILE 1230-020-2863 CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4789 10800-120-1670 COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 CROATIA 080-08-06-309 CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 ESTONIA 800-011-1093 FINLAND 358-9-5424-7162 0-800-9-14610 FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 HUNGARY 36-1-700-8856 06-800-12755 INDIA BANGALORE: 91-80-61275204 INDIA MUMBAI: 91-22-61501629 INDIA INDIA A: 000-800-852-1268 INDIA INDIA B: 000-800-001-6305 INDIA INDIA C: 1800-300-00491 INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 ITALY MILAN: 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 ITALY ROME: 39-06-8751-6018 800-986-383 ITALY TORINO: 39-011-510-0118 800-986-383 JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7878-2631 0066-33-132439 JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-6868-2631 0066-33-132439 LATVIA 8000-3185 LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 8002-9246 MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 MEXICO GUADALAJARA (JAL): 52-33-3208-7310 001-866-376-9696 MEXICO MEXICO CITY: 52-55-5062-9110 001-866-376-9696 MEXICO MONTERREY: 52-81-2482-0610 001-866-376-9696 NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 PANAMA 011-001-800-5072065 PERU 0800-53713 PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 1800-111-42453 POLAND 00-800-1212572 PORTUGAL 8008-14052 ROMANIA 40-31-630-01-79 RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 SAUDI ARABIA 800-8-110087 SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 0800-002066 SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 TURKEY 00-800-151-0516 UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 8000-35702370 UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From zhangzuan at conac.cn Tue Jun 9 11:16:01 2015 From: zhangzuan at conac.cn (=?UTF-8?B?5byg6ZK7?=) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 19:16:01 +0800 (GMT+08:00) Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T Last editing telephone meeting - today 13:00 UTC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4dfd1af8.939.14dd808bda1.Coremail.zhangzuan@conac.cn> Dear Chris, I am sorry that I cannot make today's call. Please be noted. Thank you. -----????----- ???:"Dillon, Chris" ????:2015-06-09 16:20:40 (???) ???: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" ??: ??: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T Last editing telephone meeting - today 13:00 UTC Dear colleagues, Please find the draft agenda for today's meeting below: Draft agenda 1. Welcome 2. Roll call 3. Statements of interest 4. Draft final report v5.1 (especially recommendations p.19-20) 5. Next steps and procedures 6. AOB It includes the latest version of the draft final report. Please note that today is scheduled to be our last editing meeting. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon The next Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group teleconference is scheduled for Tuesday, 09 June 2015 at 1300 UTC 06:00 PDT, 09:00 EDT, 14:00 London, 15:00 CET For other places see: http://tinyurl.com/objugrv A calendar invitation will be sent shortly after this email. If you do not receive it, please download the ical invitation attached to this email. Adobe Connect room Mailing list archives Wiki page The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page The dial-in details are below - please let me know if you require a dial-out. Please confirm your dial-out requests GNSO Secretariats gnso-secs at icann.org _____________________________________________________________________ Participant passcode: CONTACT | | Dial in numbers: | Country | | Toll Numbers | Freephone/ Toll Free Number | | | | | | | | | ARGENTINA | | | 0800-777-0519 | | AUSTRALIA | ADELAIDE: | 61-8-8121-4842 | 1-800-657-260 | | AUSTRALIA | BRISBANE: | 61-7-3102-0944 | 1-800-657-260 | | AUSTRALIA | CANBERRA: | 61-2-6100-1944 | 1-800-657-260 | | AUSTRALIA | MELBOURNE: | 61-3-9010-7713 | 1-800-657-260 | | AUSTRALIA | PERTH: | 61-8-9467-5223 | 1-800-657-260 | | AUSTRALIA | SYDNEY: | 61-2-8205-8129 | 1-800-657-260 | | AUSTRIA | | 43-1-92-81-113 | 0800-005-259 | | BELGIUM | | 32-2-400-9861 | 0800-3-8795 | | BRAZIL | | 55-11-3958-0779 | 0800-7610651 | | CHILE | | | 1230-020-2863 | | CHINA | CHINA A: | 86-400-810-4789 | 10800-712-1670 | | CHINA | CHINA B: | 86-400-810-4789 | 10800-120-1670 | | COLOMBIA | | | 01800-9-156474 | | CROATIA | | | 080-08-06-309 | | CZECH REPUBLIC | | 420-2-25-98-56-64 | 800-700-177 | | DENMARK | | 45-7014-0284 | 8088-8324 | | ESTONIA | | | 800-011-1093 | | FINLAND | | 358-9-5424-7162 | 0-800-9-14610 | | FRANCE | LYON: | 33-4-26-69-12-85 | 080-511-1496 | | FRANCE | MARSEILLE: | 33-4-86-06-00-85 | 080-511-1496 | | FRANCE | PARIS: | 33-1-70-70-60-72 | 080-511-1496 | | GERMANY | | 49-69-2222-20362 | 0800-664-4247 | | GREECE | | 30-80-1-100-0687 | 00800-12-7312 | | HONG KONG | | 852-3001-3863 | 800-962-856 | | HUNGARY | | 36-1-700-8856 | 06-800-12755 | | INDIA | BANGALORE: | 91-80-61275204 | | | INDIA | MUMBAI: | 91-22-61501629 | | | INDIA | INDIA A: | | 000-800-852-1268 | | INDIA | INDIA B: | | 000-800-001-6305 | | INDIA | INDIA C: | | 1800-300-00491 | | INDONESIA | | | 001-803-011-3982 | | IRELAND | | 353-1-246-7646 | 1800-992-368 | | ISRAEL | | | 1-80-9216162 | | ITALY | MILAN: | 39-02-3600-6007 | 800-986-383 | | ITALY | ROME: | 39-06-8751-6018 | 800-986-383 | | ITALY | TORINO: | 39-011-510-0118 | 800-986-383 | | JAPAN | OSAKA: | 81-6-7878-2631 | 0066-33-132439 | | JAPAN | TOKYO: | 81-3-6868-2631 | 0066-33-132439 | | LATVIA | | | 8000-3185 | | LUXEMBOURG | | 352-27-000-1364 | 8002-9246 | | MALAYSIA | | | 1-800-81-3065 | | MEXICO | GUADALAJARA (JAL): | 52-33-3208-7310 | 001-866-376-9696 | | MEXICO | MEXICO CITY: | 52-55-5062-9110 | 001-866-376-9696 | | MEXICO | MONTERREY: | 52-81-2482-0610 | 001-866-376-9696 | | NETHERLANDS | | 31-20-718-8588 | 0800-023-4378 | | NEW ZEALAND | | 64-9-970-4771 | 0800-447-722 | | NORWAY | | 47-21-590-062 | 800-15157 | | PANAMA | | | 011-001-800-5072065 | | PERU | | | 0800-53713 | | PHILIPPINES | | 63-2-858-3716 | 1800-111-42453 | | POLAND | | | 00-800-1212572 | | PORTUGAL | | | 8008-14052 | | ROMANIA | | 40-31-630-01-79 | | | RUSSIA | | | 8-10-8002-0144011 | | SAUDI ARABIA | | | 800-8-110087 | | SINGAPORE | | 65-6883-9230 | 800-120-4663 | | SLOVAK REPUBLIC | | 421-2-322-422-25 | 0800-002066 | | SOUTH AFRICA | | | 080-09-80414 | | SOUTH KOREA | | 82-2-6744-1083 | 00798-14800-7352 | | SPAIN | | 34-91-414-25-33 | 800-300-053 | | SWEDEN | | 46-8-566-19-348 | 0200-884-622 | | SWITZERLAND | | 41-44-580-6398 | 0800-120-032 | | TAIWAN | | 886-2-2795-7379 | 00801-137-797 | | THAILAND | | | 001-800-1206-66056 | | TURKEY | | | 00-800-151-0516 | | UNITED ARAB EMIRATES | | | 8000-35702370 | | UNITED KINGDOM | BIRMINGHAM: | 44-121-210-9025 | 0808-238-6029 | | UNITED KINGDOM | GLASGOW: | 44-141-202-3225 | 0808-238-6029 | | UNITED KINGDOM | LEEDS: | 44-113-301-2125 | 0808-238-6029 | | UNITED KINGDOM | LONDON: | 44-20-7108-6370 | 0808-238-6029 | | UNITED KINGDOM | MANCHESTER: | 44-161-601-1425 | 0808-238-6029 | | URUGUAY | | | 000-413-598-3421 | | USA | | 1-517-345-9004 | 866-692-5726 | | VENEZUELA | | | 0800-1-00-3702 | | | | | Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew -- ??????????????????????????? ??? ?? ? ??010-6900 1156 Email?zhangzuan at conac.cn ? ??http://www.conac.cn ? ????????????15??6??????417? ? ??100088 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Tue Jun 9 11:21:58 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 11:21:58 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T Last editing telephone meeting - today 13:00 UTC In-Reply-To: <4dfd1af8.939.14dd808bda1.Coremail.zhangzuan@conac.cn> References: <4dfd1af8.939.14dd808bda1.Coremail.zhangzuan@conac.cn> Message-ID: Dear Peter, You?re on my little list of apologies. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: ?? [mailto:zhangzuan at conac.cn] Sent: 09 June 2015 12:16 To: Dillon, Chris Cc: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T Last editing telephone meeting - today 13:00 UTC Dear Chris, I am sorry that I cannot make today's call. Please be noted. Thank you. -----????----- ???:"Dillon, Chris" ????:2015-06-09 16:20:40 (???) ???: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" ??: ??: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T Last editing telephone meeting - today 13:00 UTC Dear colleagues, Please find the draft agenda for today's meeting below: Draft agenda 1. Welcome 2. Roll call 3. Statements of interest 4. Draft final report v5.1 (especially recommendations p.19-20) 5. Next steps and procedures 6. AOB It includes the latest version of the draft final report. Please note that today is scheduled to be our last editing meeting. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon The next Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group teleconference is scheduled for Tuesday, 09 June 2015 at 1300 UTC 06:00 PDT, 09:00 EDT, 14:00 London, 15:00 CET For other places see: http://tinyurl.com/objugrv A calendar invitation will be sent shortly after this email. If you do not receive it, please download the ical invitation attached to this email. Adobe Connect room Mailing list archives Wiki page The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page The dial-in details are below - please let me know if you require a dial-out. Please confirm your dial-out requests GNSO Secretariats gnso-secs at icann.org _____________________________________________________________________ Participant passcode: CONTACT Dial in numbers: Country Toll Numbers Freephone/ Toll Free Number ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 BRAZIL 55-11-3958-0779 0800-7610651 CHILE 1230-020-2863 CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4789 10800-120-1670 COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 CROATIA 080-08-06-309 CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 ESTONIA 800-011-1093 FINLAND 358-9-5424-7162 0-800-9-14610 FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 HUNGARY 36-1-700-8856 06-800-12755 INDIA BANGALORE: 91-80-61275204 INDIA MUMBAI: 91-22-61501629 INDIA INDIA A: 000-800-852-1268 INDIA INDIA B: 000-800-001-6305 INDIA INDIA C: 1800-300-00491 INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 ITALY MILAN: 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 ITALY ROME: 39-06-8751-6018 800-986-383 ITALY TORINO: 39-011-510-0118 800-986-383 JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7878-2631 0066-33-132439 JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-6868-2631 0066-33-132439 LATVIA 8000-3185 LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 8002-9246 MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 MEXICO GUADALAJARA (JAL): 52-33-3208-7310 001-866-376-9696 MEXICO MEXICO CITY: 52-55-5062-9110 001-866-376-9696 MEXICO MONTERREY: 52-81-2482-0610 001-866-376-9696 NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 PANAMA 011-001-800-5072065 PERU 0800-53713 PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 1800-111-42453 POLAND 00-800-1212572 PORTUGAL 8008-14052 ROMANIA 40-31-630-01-79 RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 SAUDI ARABIA 800-8-110087 SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 0800-002066 SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 TURKEY 00-800-151-0516 UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 8000-35702370 UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew -- ??????????????????????????? ??? ?? ? ??010-6900 1156 Email?zhangzuan at conac.cn ? ??http://www.conac.cn ? ????????????15??6??????417? ? ??100088 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jgalvin at afilias.info Tue Jun 9 12:27:26 2015 From: jgalvin at afilias.info (James Galvin) Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 08:27:26 -0400 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T Last editing telephone meeting - today 13:00 UTC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5576DBAE.6050104@afilias.info> I will join this call on time but unfortunately I'm double booked against a higher priority shorter call so I won't be fully engaged for about 20-30 minutes. Jim On 6/9/15 4:20 AM, Dillon, Chris wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Please find the draft agenda for today's meeting below: > > Draft agenda > 1. Welcome > 2. Roll call > 3. Statements of interest > 4.Draft final report v5.1 (especially recommendations p.19-20) > > 5. Next steps and procedures > 6. AOB > > It includes the latest version of the draft final report. Please note > that today is scheduled to be our last editing meeting. > > Regards, > > Chris. > > -- > > Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital > Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int > 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon > > > The next**Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP > Working Group teleconference is scheduled for *Tuesday, 09 June 2015 at > 1300 UTC* > > 06:00 PDT, 09:00 EDT, 14:00 London, 15:00 CET > > For other places see:*http://tinyurl.com/objugrv * > > A calendar invitation will be sent shortly after this email. If you do > not receive it, please download the ical invitation attached to this email. > > Adobe Connect room > > > Mailing list archives > > > Wiki page > > The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO > Master Calendar page > > The dial-in details are below - please let me know if you require a > dial-out. > > *Please confirm your dial-out requests* > > GNSO Secretariats gnso-secs at icann.org > > _____________________________________________________________________ > > Participant passcode: *CONTACT* > > *Dial in numbers:* > > *Country* > > > > > > *Toll Numbers* > > > > *Freephone/ > Toll Free Number* > > > > ARGENTINA > > > > > > > > 0800-777-0519 > > AUSTRALIA > > > > ADELAIDE: > > > > 61-8-8121-4842 > > > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > > > BRISBANE: > > > > 61-7-3102-0944 > > > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > > > CANBERRA: > > > > 61-2-6100-1944 > > > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > > > MELBOURNE: > > > > 61-3-9010-7713 > > > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > > > PERTH: > > > > 61-8-9467-5223 > > > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > > > SYDNEY: > > > > 61-2-8205-8129 > > > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRIA > > > > > > 43-1-92-81-113 > > > > 0800-005-259 > > BELGIUM > > > > > > 32-2-400-9861 > > > > 0800-3-8795 > > BRAZIL > > > > > > 55-11-3958-0779 > > > > 0800-7610651 > > CHILE > > > > > > > > 1230-020-2863 > > CHINA > > > > CHINA A: > > > > 86-400-810-4789 > > > > 10800-712-1670 > > CHINA > > > > CHINA B: > > > > 86-400-810-4789 > > > > 10800-120-1670 > > COLOMBIA > > > > > > > > 01800-9-156474 > > CROATIA > > > > > > > > 080-08-06-309 > > CZECH REPUBLIC > > > > > > 420-2-25-98-56-64 > > > > 800-700-177 > > DENMARK > > > > > > 45-7014-0284 > > > > 8088-8324 > > ESTONIA > > > > > > > > 800-011-1093 > > FINLAND > > > > > > 358-9-5424-7162 > > > > 0-800-9-14610 > > FRANCE > > > > LYON: > > > > 33-4-26-69-12-85 > > > > 080-511-1496 > > FRANCE > > > > MARSEILLE: > > > > 33-4-86-06-00-85 > > > > 080-511-1496 > > FRANCE > > > > PARIS: > > > > 33-1-70-70-60-72 > > > > 080-511-1496 > > GERMANY > > > > > > 49-69-2222-20362 > > > > 0800-664-4247 > > GREECE > > > > > > 30-80-1-100-0687 > > > > 00800-12-7312 > > HONG KONG > > > > > > 852-3001-3863 > > > > 800-962-856 > > HUNGARY > > > > > > 36-1-700-8856 > > > > 06-800-12755 > > INDIA > > > > BANGALORE: > > > > 91-80-61275204 > > > > INDIA > > > > MUMBAI: > > > > 91-22-61501629 > > > > INDIA > > > > INDIA A: > > > > > > 000-800-852-1268 > > INDIA > > > > INDIA B: > > > > > > 000-800-001-6305 > > INDIA > > > > INDIA C: > > > > > > 1800-300-00491 > > INDONESIA > > > > > > > > 001-803-011-3982 > > IRELAND > > > > > > 353-1-246-7646 > > > > 1800-992-368 > > ISRAEL > > > > > > > > 1-80-9216162 > > ITALY > > > > MILAN: > > > > 39-02-3600-6007 > > > > 800-986-383 > > ITALY > > > > ROME: > > > > 39-06-8751-6018 > > > > 800-986-383 > > ITALY > > > > TORINO: > > > > 39-011-510-0118 > > > > 800-986-383 > > JAPAN > > > > OSAKA: > > > > 81-6-7878-2631 > > > > 0066-33-132439 > > JAPAN > > > > TOKYO: > > > > 81-3-6868-2631 > > > > 0066-33-132439 > > LATVIA > > > > > > > > 8000-3185 > > LUXEMBOURG > > > > > > 352-27-000-1364 > > > > 8002-9246 > > MALAYSIA > > > > > > > > 1-800-81-3065 > > MEXICO > > > > GUADALAJARA (JAL): > > > > 52-33-3208-7310 > > > > 001-866-376-9696 > > MEXICO > > > > MEXICO CITY: > > > > 52-55-5062-9110 > > > > 001-866-376-9696 > > MEXICO > > > > MONTERREY: > > > > 52-81-2482-0610 > > > > 001-866-376-9696 > > NETHERLANDS > > > > > > 31-20-718-8588 > > > > 0800-023-4378 > > NEW ZEALAND > > > > > > 64-9-970-4771 > > > > 0800-447-722 > > NORWAY > > > > > > 47-21-590-062 > > > > 800-15157 > > PANAMA > > > > > > > > 011-001-800-5072065 > > PERU > > > > > > > > 0800-53713 > > PHILIPPINES > > > > > > 63-2-858-3716 > > > > 1800-111-42453 > > POLAND > > > > > > > > 00-800-1212572 > > PORTUGAL > > > > > > > > 8008-14052 > > ROMANIA > > > > > > 40-31-630-01-79 > > > > RUSSIA > > > > > > > > 8-10-8002-0144011 > > SAUDI ARABIA > > > > > > > > 800-8-110087 > > SINGAPORE > > > > > > 65-6883-9230 > > > > 800-120-4663 > > SLOVAK REPUBLIC > > > > > > 421-2-322-422-25 > > > > 0800-002066 > > SOUTH AFRICA > > > > > > > > 080-09-80414 > > SOUTH KOREA > > > > > > 82-2-6744-1083 > > > > 00798-14800-7352 > > SPAIN > > > > > > 34-91-414-25-33 > > > > 800-300-053 > > SWEDEN > > > > > > 46-8-566-19-348 > > > > 0200-884-622 > > SWITZERLAND > > > > > > 41-44-580-6398 > > > > 0800-120-032 > > TAIWAN > > > > > > 886-2-2795-7379 > > > > 00801-137-797 > > THAILAND > > > > > > > > 001-800-1206-66056 > > TURKEY > > > > > > > > 00-800-151-0516 > > UNITED ARAB EMIRATES > > > > > > > > 8000-35702370 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > > > BIRMINGHAM: > > > > 44-121-210-9025 > > > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > > > GLASGOW: > > > > 44-141-202-3225 > > > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > > > LEEDS: > > > > 44-113-301-2125 > > > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > > > LONDON: > > > > 44-20-7108-6370 > > > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > > > MANCHESTER: > > > > 44-161-601-1425 > > > > 0808-238-6029 > > URUGUAY > > > > > > > > 000-413-598-3421 > > USA > > > > > > 1-517-345-9004 > > > > 866-692-5726 > > VENEZUELA > > > > > > > > 0800-1-00-3702 > > Thank you. > > Kind regards, > > Terri Agnew > From aelsadr at egyptig.org Tue Jun 9 12:43:56 2015 From: aelsadr at egyptig.org (Amr Elsadr) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 14:43:56 +0200 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T Last editing telephone meeting - today 13:00 UTC In-Reply-To: <5576DBAE.6050104@afilias.info> References: <5576DBAE.6050104@afilias.info> Message-ID: <01F6E00D-D5EE-4703-8116-418262A788DA@egyptig.org> And I don't think I'm going to make it at all. Running late with another commitment. Apologies. Amr Sent from mobile > On Jun 9, 2015, at 2:27 PM, James Galvin wrote: > > > I will join this call on time but unfortunately I'm double booked against a higher priority shorter call so I won't be fully engaged for about 20-30 minutes. > > Jim > > > >> On 6/9/15 4:20 AM, Dillon, Chris wrote: >> Dear colleagues, >> >> Please find the draft agenda for today's meeting below: >> >> Draft agenda >> 1. Welcome >> 2. Roll call >> 3. Statements of interest >> 4.Draft final report v5.1 (especially recommendations p.19-20) >> >> 5. Next steps and procedures >> 6. AOB >> >> It includes the latest version of the draft final report. Please note >> that today is scheduled to be our last editing meeting. >> >> Regards, >> >> Chris. >> >> -- >> >> Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital >> Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int >> 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon >> >> >> The next**Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP >> Working Group teleconference is scheduled for *Tuesday, 09 June 2015 at >> 1300 UTC* From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Tue Jun 9 17:01:30 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 17:01:30 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T: Final deadline for amendments to the final report Message-ID: Dear colleagues, Please propose any amendments to the version attached (updated in the light of today's meeting) by 23:59 UTC today. Please note that: * the authoritative version of the recommendations is on p.19-20. * the executive summary will be amended at the end. Incidentally, for those not at today's meeting, our final working group meeting is this Thursday at 13:00 UTC. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: Lars Hoffmann [mailto:lars.hoffmann at icann.org] Sent: 09 June 2015 17:45 To: Dillon, Chris Subject: report Hi Chris. Here are my two cents - see what you think. When you send to the Group, make sure to give them the page numbers - and point out that the executive summary will be amended at the end. The authoritative text is in Section 5. They have until 23:59 UTC to propose amendments. Is it ok for you to send out? Cheers Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Draft_Final_V5-3.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 489825 bytes Desc: Draft_Final_V5-3.docx URL: From nathalie.peregrine at icann.org Tue Jun 9 22:04:59 2015 From: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org (Nathalie Peregrine) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 22:04:59 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] MP3 Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG meeting 9 June 2015 Message-ID: Dear All, Please find the MP3 recording for the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group call held on Tuesday 9 June 2015 at 13:00 UTC at: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-transliteration-contact-09jun15-en.mp3 On page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#jun The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page:http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar Attendees: Chris Dillon - NCSG Sara Bockey - RrSG Justine Chew - Individual Jim Galvin - RySG Rudi Vansnick - NPOC Roger Carney - RrSG Wanawit Akhuputra - GAC Wen Zhai - RySG Apologies: Amr Elsadr - NCUC Petter Rindforth - IPC Peter Green (Zhang Zuan) - NCUC Pitinan Kooarmonpatana - GAC ICANN Staff Julie Hedlund Lars Hoffmann Nathalie Peregrine ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Wiki page: http://tinyurl.com/mpwxstx Thank you. Kind regards, Nathalie Adobe Chat Transcript for Tuesday 9 June 2015: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rudi.vansnick at isoc.be Wed Jun 10 12:56:18 2015 From: rudi.vansnick at isoc.be (Rudi Vansnick) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:56:18 +0200 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final version and call for consensus Message-ID: <9FB61505-ED6B-4D0F-AD24-817DD3BF3231@isoc.be> Dear working group members, As co-chairs of the Translation and Transliteration Working Group, Chris Dillon and I have reached the following conclusions: 1. All public comments have been reviewed and discussed by the WG and a number of amendments were made to the Initial Report - as agreed to by members of the Working Group. 2. There have been no objections to the Final Report communicated on the WG list it was first sent to the WG on 5 June 2015 at 06:50 UTC with a final response deadline of Tuesday 9 June 23:59 UTC. 3. Therefore, we determine that the Working Group has reached full consensus on the Final Report as attached in clean and redline versions, noting that the redline version highlights all edits made to the Initial Report that was published for public comment in December 2015. All WG participants have until 12:00 UTC (noon) on Thursday 11 June 2015 to object to the ?full consensus? call by the co-chairs. If anyone objects, please explain your reasons. If no one objects in the allotted time, the report will be sent by our Council Liaison to the GNSO Council for their action along with a draft motion for its approval. If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask. Rudi Vansnick Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) www.npoc.org rudi.vansnick at npoc.org Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Final Report - redline versus Initial Report T&T.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 870119 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Final Report T&T.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 514459 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From aelsadr at egyptig.org Wed Jun 10 14:56:20 2015 From: aelsadr at egyptig.org (Amr Elsadr) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:56:20 +0200 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final version and call for consensus In-Reply-To: <9FB61505-ED6B-4D0F-AD24-817DD3BF3231@isoc.be> References: <9FB61505-ED6B-4D0F-AD24-817DD3BF3231@isoc.be> Message-ID: <331F97D7-9822-47E1-9B22-F1B00BFE1A86@egyptig.org> Hi, Thanks for this, Rudi. I have a few questions and comment, which I have place in-line below: On Jun 10, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Rudi Vansnick wrote: > Dear working group members, > > As co-chairs of the Translation and Transliteration Working Group, Chris Dillon and I have reached the following conclusions: > 1. All public comments have been reviewed and discussed by the WG and a number of amendments were made to the Initial Report - as agreed to by members of the Working Group. > 2. There have been no objections to the Final Report communicated on the WG list it was first sent to the WG on 5 June 2015 at 06:50 UTC with a final response deadline of Tuesday 9 June 23:59 UTC. Since the last editing session of the final report was yesterday (June 9th), doesn?t the final report attached to your email today actually count as the actual final report (as opposed to the one circulated on June 5th)? I ask this because: > 3. Therefore, we determine that the Working Group has reached full consensus on the Final Report as attached in clean and redline versions, noting that the redline version highlights all edits made to the Initial Report that was published for public comment in December 2015. > > All WG participants have until 12:00 UTC (noon) on Thursday 11 June 2015 to object to the ?full consensus? call by the co-chairs. I?m not sure if the time allowed is enough for all WG members to respond to the consensus call or not. Seems a bit tight to me. One of the reasons includes?, > If anyone objects, please explain your reasons. If no one objects in the allotted time, the report will be sent by our Council Liaison to the GNSO Council for their action along with a draft motion for its approval. Along with the objections and reasons provided by any who may wish to express a lack of ?full consensus?, minority statements to the WG consensus may need to be submitted and attached to the final report. Pleas take the time needed (if at all needed) to do this into consideration with the deadline of the consensus call. > > If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask. A couple of questions: 1. On pages 4 and 19 of the final report, recommendation #3 mentions ccTLDs. Why are we including this in our recommendations? I don?t recall seeing it there before. Policies concerning ccTLDs are far beyond the remit of any GNSO PDP WG. 2. On pages 4 and 20 of the final report, the second charter question of this PDP seems misrepresented to me requiring a discussion on who should bear the burden of transformation, as opposed to who should decide who bears the burden. This is correctly represented in other parts of the report, such as on page 7. Having said all that, I support the recommendations in the final report. There seems to be a considerable amount of work done on it, and I very much appreciate the editing performed to get this done. Very well done, indeed. Thanks. Amr From lars.hoffmann at icann.org Wed Jun 10 15:02:55 2015 From: lars.hoffmann at icann.org (Lars Hoffmann) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:02:55 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final version and call for consensus In-Reply-To: <331F97D7-9822-47E1-9B22-F1B00BFE1A86@egyptig.org> References: <9FB61505-ED6B-4D0F-AD24-817DD3BF3231@isoc.be> <331F97D7-9822-47E1-9B22-F1B00BFE1A86@egyptig.org> Message-ID: Thank you for your comment, Amr. I think that the reason 5 June is mentioned is that the recommendations (in spirit) have not changed since then. Although small edits were made, they are unlikely to change someone?s position at this stage. In addition, no comments or amendments were put forward on the email list either, nor were any additional ones raised during Tuesday?s call. Also, the timeline was circulated among members and no objections were made regarding those. Of course, if there are concerns that more time is needed it is up to the Chair to extend deadlines were needed/appropriate; bearing in mind that the deadline to make the next GNSO Council submission deadline is this coming Sunday - which was the date the Group aimed for. Can I suggest that those needing/wanting more time, indicate this on list so that the Chair can take an informed decision? As for your two substantive issues, I completely agree with your comments. The /ccTLD should be taken out - as an explanation, it was something we discussed on the call (in a slightly different context) and it made it?s way into the recommendation. It clearly is beyond our charter. References on pp. 4 and 20 to bearing cost should also be amended. Thank you very much for your help with getting us to this stage, Amr! Very best. Lars On 10/06/2015 16:56, "Amr Elsadr" wrote: >Hi, > >Thanks for this, Rudi. I have a few questions and comment, which I have >place in-line below: > >On Jun 10, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Rudi Vansnick wrote: > >> Dear working group members, >> >> As co-chairs of the Translation and Transliteration Working Group, >>Chris Dillon and I have reached the following conclusions: >> 1. All public comments have been reviewed and discussed by the WG >>and a number of amendments were made to the Initial Report - as agreed >>to by members of the Working Group. >> 2. There have been no objections to the Final Report communicated >>on the WG list it was first sent to the WG on 5 June 2015 at 06:50 UTC >>with a final response deadline of Tuesday 9 June 23:59 UTC. > >Since the last editing session of the final report was yesterday (June >9th), doesn?t the final report attached to your email today actually >count as the actual final report (as opposed to the one circulated on >June 5th)? I ask this because: > >> 3. Therefore, we determine that the Working Group has reached >>full consensus on the Final Report as attached in clean and redline >>versions, noting that the redline version highlights all edits made to >>the Initial Report that was published for public comment in December >>2015. >> >> All WG participants have until 12:00 UTC (noon) on Thursday 11 June >>2015 to object to the ?full consensus? call by the co-chairs. > >I?m not sure if the time allowed is enough for all WG members to respond >to the consensus call or not. Seems a bit tight to me. One of the reasons >includes?, > >> If anyone objects, please explain your reasons. If no one objects in >>the allotted time, the report will be sent by our Council Liaison to the >>GNSO Council for their action along with a draft motion for its approval. > >Along with the objections and reasons provided by any who may wish to >express a lack of ?full consensus?, minority statements to the WG >consensus may need to be submitted and attached to the final report. >Pleas take the time needed (if at all needed) to do this into >consideration with the deadline of the consensus call. > >> >> If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask. > >A couple of questions: > >1. On pages 4 and 19 of the final report, recommendation #3 mentions >ccTLDs. Why are we including this in our recommendations? I don?t recall >seeing it there before. Policies concerning ccTLDs are far beyond the >remit of any GNSO PDP WG. > >2. On pages 4 and 20 of the final report, the second charter question of >this PDP seems misrepresented to me requiring a discussion on who should >bear the burden of transformation, as opposed to who should decide who >bears the burden. This is correctly represented in other parts of the >report, such as on page 7. > >Having said all that, I support the recommendations in the final report. >There seems to be a considerable amount of work done on it, and I very >much appreciate the editing performed to get this done. Very well done, >indeed. > >Thanks. > >Amr -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5091 bytes Desc: not available URL: From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Wed Jun 10 15:16:50 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:16:50 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final version and call for consensus In-Reply-To: <331F97D7-9822-47E1-9B22-F1B00BFE1A86@egyptig.org> References: <9FB61505-ED6B-4D0F-AD24-817DD3BF3231@isoc.be> <331F97D7-9822-47E1-9B22-F1B00BFE1A86@egyptig.org> Message-ID: Dear colleagues, I attach a new version of the final report with Amr's suggestions about the ccTLD reference and the misquote of the charter question adopted. I've also attached Rudi's email from earlier and the redline report, so that you have everything in one place. Our next meeting is at 13:00 UTC tomorrow. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon Dear working group members, As co-chairs of the Translation and Transliteration Working Group, Chris Dillon and I have reached the following conclusions: 1. All public comments have been reviewed and discussed by the WG and a number of amendments were made to the Initial Report - as agreed to by members of the Working Group. 2. There have been no objections to the Final Report communicated on the WG list it was first sent to the WG on 5 June 2015 at 06:50 UTC with a final response deadline of Tuesday 9 June 23:59 UTC. 3. Therefore, we determine that the Working Group has reached full consensus on the Final Report as attached in clean and redline versions, noting that the redline version highlights all edits made to the Initial Report that was published for public comment in December 2015. All WG participants have until 12:00 UTC (noon) on Thursday 11 June 2015 to object to the 'full consensus' call by the co-chairs. If anyone objects, please explain your reasons. If no one objects in the allotted time, the report will be sent by our Council Liaison to the GNSO Council for their action along with a draft motion for its approval. If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask. -----Original Message----- From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org] Sent: 10 June 2015 15:56 To: Rudi Vansnick Cc: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org; Dillon, Chris; Lars Hoffmann Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final version and call for consensus Hi, Thanks for this, Rudi. I have a few questions and comment, which I have place in-line below: On Jun 10, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Rudi Vansnick wrote: > Dear working group members, > > As co-chairs of the Translation and Transliteration Working Group, Chris Dillon and I have reached the following conclusions: > 1. All public comments have been reviewed and discussed by the WG and a number of amendments were made to the Initial Report - as agreed to by members of the Working Group. > 2. There have been no objections to the Final Report communicated on the WG list it was first sent to the WG on 5 June 2015 at 06:50 UTC with a final response deadline of Tuesday 9 June 23:59 UTC. Since the last editing session of the final report was yesterday (June 9th), doesn't the final report attached to your email today actually count as the actual final report (as opposed to the one circulated on June 5th)? I ask this because: > 3. Therefore, we determine that the Working Group has reached full consensus on the Final Report as attached in clean and redline versions, noting that the redline version highlights all edits made to the Initial Report that was published for public comment in December 2015. > > All WG participants have until 12:00 UTC (noon) on Thursday 11 June 2015 to object to the 'full consensus' call by the co-chairs. I'm not sure if the time allowed is enough for all WG members to respond to the consensus call or not. Seems a bit tight to me. One of the reasons includes..., > If anyone objects, please explain your reasons. If no one objects in the allotted time, the report will be sent by our Council Liaison to the GNSO Council for their action along with a draft motion for its approval. Along with the objections and reasons provided by any who may wish to express a lack of "full consensus", minority statements to the WG consensus may need to be submitted and attached to the final report. Pleas take the time needed (if at all needed) to do this into consideration with the deadline of the consensus call. > > If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask. A couple of questions: 1. On pages 4 and 19 of the final report, recommendation #3 mentions ccTLDs. Why are we including this in our recommendations? I don't recall seeing it there before. Policies concerning ccTLDs are far beyond the remit of any GNSO PDP WG. 2. On pages 4 and 20 of the final report, the second charter question of this PDP seems misrepresented to me requiring a discussion on who should bear the burden of transformation, as opposed to who should decide who bears the burden. This is correctly represented in other parts of the report, such as on page 7. Having said all that, I support the recommendations in the final report. There seems to be a considerable amount of work done on it, and I very much appreciate the editing performed to get this done. Very well done, indeed. Thanks. Amr -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Final Report T&T.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 469699 bytes Desc: Final Report T&T.docx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Final Report - redline versus Initial Report T&T.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 870119 bytes Desc: Final Report - redline versus Initial Report T&T.docx URL: From justine.chew at gmail.com Wed Jun 10 15:19:22 2015 From: justine.chew at gmail.com (Justine Chew) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 23:19:22 +0800 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final version and call for consensus In-Reply-To: <9FB61505-ED6B-4D0F-AD24-817DD3BF3231@isoc.be> References: <9FB61505-ED6B-4D0F-AD24-817DD3BF3231@isoc.be> Message-ID: Dear Chris, Rudi, I am re-reading Final Report T&T.docx and while in my opinion, everything is substantially in order, there are some formatting issues and spelling errors for your attention: 1. Table of Contents - section 6. Community Input has renumbered itself to 1. and so forth. 2. Chapter 1.1 Background - the open inverted comma that appears towards the end of the 4th line is missing is close counterpart. This perhaps should appear at the end of Chapter 1.1, ie. end of the 2nd bullet? 3. Chapter 1.3 Recommendation #3 on pg 4 - is reference to 'ccTLD' meant to be included considering that our mission and scope only pertains to contact information with respect to gTLDs? Where else is 'ccTLD' mentioned except as a supporting example on pg 16? I thought our debate centered purely on gLTDs. 4. Chapter 1.3 Recommendation #4 on pg 4 - 'policies' on the 4th line is mis-spelt. Also the 2nd sentence on the 4th line seems to be 'hanging', perhaps prefix it with "It is also assured that ....."? 5. Chapter 1.3 Recommendation #6 on pg 4 - the part of the sentence beginning on the 3rd line reads funny. May I suggest it be reworded to read as "... and its linguistic/script capacity expanded for receiving, ......"? 6. Chapter 1.3 Last paragraph on pg 4 - should be '... the question of who should decide who should bear ....' i.e the words 'of who' have been omitted. 7. Chapter 1.4 - I know that the Working Group has been abbreviated to (WG) in para 1.2 but I think no where else is the abbreviation of WG used in this document except for in chapter 1.4 - so can I please be pedantic and ask that the 2 references to 'WG' - one in each paragraph - be amended to 'Working Group'? 8. Chapter 3 - suffers the same issue as in Chapter 1.1 i.e. missing closing inverted comma in 1st para. 9. Chapter 4 on pg 9 2nd para - to remove the word 'some' on the 4th line. 10. End of Chapter 5.1.2 on pg 17 - perhaps add the words 'although the Working Group did not come to a conclusion as to who should decide who should bear the said burden.' to properly address our non-answering of Charter Q2. 11. Chapter 5.1.3 on pg 17 - the word 'borne' is mis-spelt; appears twice in the 2nd paragraph. 12. Chapter 5.2.1 on pg 18 para 1 - 'losslessly'? You mean 'loosely'? 13. Chapter 5.2.2 Recommendation #3 on pg 19 - see point 3 above, take out reference to 'ccTLD'? 14. Chapter 5.2.2 Recommendation #4 on pg 19 - see point 4 above, 'policies' is mis-spelt. 15. Chapter 5.2.2 Recommendation $6 on top of pg 20 - see point 5 above. 16. End of Chapter 5.2.2 re Charter Q2 - see point 6 above. I take it that the rest of the document contains text copied from a reliable source. Also that Annex B is the same copy that was finalised before. Once again, I thank you for your hard work and dedication in leading the WG to this Final Report. Kind regards, Justine Chew ----- On 10 June 2015 at 20:56, Rudi Vansnick wrote: > Dear working group members, > > As co-chairs of the Translation and Transliteration Working Group, Chris > Dillon and I have reached the following conclusions: > 1. All public comments have been reviewed and discussed by the WG > and a number of amendments were made to the Initial Report - as agreed to > by members of the Working Group. > 2. There have been no objections to the Final Report communicated > on the WG list it was first sent to the WG on 5 June 2015 at 06:50 UTC with > a final response deadline of Tuesday 9 June 23:59 UTC. > 3. Therefore, we determine that the Working Group has reached full > consensus on the Final Report as attached in clean and redline versions, > noting that the redline version highlights all edits made to the Initial > Report that was published for public comment in December 2015. > > All WG participants have until 12:00 UTC (noon) on Thursday 11 June 2015 > to object to the ?full consensus? call by the co-chairs. If anyone > objects, please explain your reasons. If no one objects in the allotted > time, the report will be sent by our Council Liaison to the GNSO Council > for their action along with a draft motion for its approval. > > If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask. > > > > > > > Rudi Vansnick > Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) > www.npoc.org > > rudi.vansnick at npoc.org > Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 > Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32 > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Wed Jun 10 15:31:22 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:31:22 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final version and call for consensus In-Reply-To: References: <9FB61505-ED6B-4D0F-AD24-817DD3BF3231@isoc.be> Message-ID: Dear Justine and colleagues, I should have mentioned earlier, as Lars email?d, please raise any request for deadline extension as soon as possible. Justine - Many thanks for your painstaking proofreading. I am happy to adopt all your edits with the one exception of ?losslessly? which is supposed to mean ?without loss (of information etc.)?, not ?loosely?. There will be one last version with proofreading edits made. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: Justine Chew [mailto:justine.chew at gmail.com] Sent: 10 June 2015 16:19 To: Rudi Vansnick; Dillon, Chris; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Cc: Lars Hoffmann Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final version and call for consensus Dear Chris, Rudi, I am re-reading Final Report T&T.docx and while in my opinion, everything is substantially in order, there are some formatting issues and spelling errors for your attention: 1. Table of Contents - section 6. Community Input has renumbered itself to 1. and so forth. 2. Chapter 1.1 Background - the open inverted comma that appears towards the end of the 4th line is missing is close counterpart. This perhaps should appear at the end of Chapter 1.1, ie. end of the 2nd bullet? 3. Chapter 1.3 Recommendation #3 on pg 4 - is reference to 'ccTLD' meant to be included considering that our mission and scope only pertains to contact information with respect to gTLDs? Where else is 'ccTLD' mentioned except as a supporting example on pg 16? I thought our debate centered purely on gLTDs. 4. Chapter 1.3 Recommendation #4 on pg 4 - 'policies' on the 4th line is mis-spelt. Also the 2nd sentence on the 4th line seems to be 'hanging', perhaps prefix it with "It is also assured that ....."? 5. Chapter 1.3 Recommendation #6 on pg 4 - the part of the sentence beginning on the 3rd line reads funny. May I suggest it be reworded to read as "... and its linguistic/script capacity expanded for receiving, ......"? 6. Chapter 1.3 Last paragraph on pg 4 - should be '... the question of who should decide who should bear ....' i.e the words 'of who' have been omitted. 7. Chapter 1.4 - I know that the Working Group has been abbreviated to (WG) in para 1.2 but I think no where else is the abbreviation of WG used in this document except for in chapter 1.4 - so can I please be pedantic and ask that the 2 references to 'WG' - one in each paragraph - be amended to 'Working Group'? 8. Chapter 3 - suffers the same issue as in Chapter 1.1 i.e. missing closing inverted comma in 1st para. 9. Chapter 4 on pg 9 2nd para - to remove the word 'some' on the 4th line. 10. End of Chapter 5.1.2 on pg 17 - perhaps add the words 'although the Working Group did not come to a conclusion as to who should decide who should bear the said burden.' to properly address our non-answering of Charter Q2. 11. Chapter 5.1.3 on pg 17 - the word 'borne' is mis-spelt; appears twice in the 2nd paragraph. 12. Chapter 5.2.1 on pg 18 para 1 - 'losslessly'? You mean 'loosely'? 13. Chapter 5.2.2 Recommendation #3 on pg 19 - see point 3 above, take out reference to 'ccTLD'? 14. Chapter 5.2.2 Recommendation #4 on pg 19 - see point 4 above, 'policies' is mis-spelt. 15. Chapter 5.2.2 Recommendation $6 on top of pg 20 - see point 5 above. 16. End of Chapter 5.2.2 re Charter Q2 - see point 6 above. I take it that the rest of the document contains text copied from a reliable source. Also that Annex B is the same copy that was finalised before. Once again, I thank you for your hard work and dedication in leading the WG to this Final Report. Kind regards, Justine Chew ----- On 10 June 2015 at 20:56, Rudi Vansnick > wrote: Dear working group members, As co-chairs of the Translation and Transliteration Working Group, Chris Dillon and I have reached the following conclusions: 1. All public comments have been reviewed and discussed by the WG and a number of amendments were made to the Initial Report - as agreed to by members of the Working Group. 2. There have been no objections to the Final Report communicated on the WG list it was first sent to the WG on 5 June 2015 at 06:50 UTC with a final response deadline of Tuesday 9 June 23:59 UTC. 3. Therefore, we determine that the Working Group has reached full consensus on the Final Report as attached in clean and redline versions, noting that the redline version highlights all edits made to the Initial Report that was published for public comment in December 2015. All WG participants have until 12:00 UTC (noon) on Thursday 11 June 2015 to object to the ?full consensus? call by the co-chairs. If anyone objects, please explain your reasons. If no one objects in the allotted time, the report will be sent by our Council Liaison to the GNSO Council for their action along with a draft motion for its approval. If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask. Rudi Vansnick Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) www.npoc.org rudi.vansnick at npoc.org Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Thu Jun 11 08:46:50 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:46:50 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T: Today's agenda Message-ID: Dear colleagues, Please find the draft agenda for today's meeting below. It includes a link to the latest version of the final report, which should incorporate both Amr's and Justine's comments and edits. Many thanks to both of them! Draft agenda 1. Welcome 2. Roll call 3. Statements of interest 4. A final look at the final report (especially recommendations) 5. Next steps and procedures 6. AOB Please note that at this stage edits need to be proofreading/consistency level. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pdernbach at winklerpartners.com Thu Jun 11 10:49:03 2015 From: pdernbach at winklerpartners.com (Peter Dernbach) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:49:03 +0800 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final version and call for consensus In-Reply-To: References: <9FB61505-ED6B-4D0F-AD24-817DD3BF3231@isoc.be> Message-ID: Dear Chris, Rudi, Lars and All, Unfortunately, I have a conflict that prevents me from joining today's call. Best regards, Peter Peter J.Dernbach ??? Partner ????(???????) *T* 886 (0)2 2311 2345 # 222 *F* 886 (0)2 2311 2688 www.winklerpartners.com pdernbach at winklerpartners.com ------------------------------ NOTICE: This email and any attachments contain private, confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or distribute the contents and are requested to delete them and to notify the sender. ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:31 PM, Dillon, Chris wrote: > Dear Justine and colleagues, > > > > I should have mentioned earlier, as Lars email?d, please raise any request > for deadline extension as soon as possible. > > > > Justine - Many thanks for your painstaking proofreading. I am happy to > adopt all your edits with the one exception of ?losslessly? which is > supposed to mean ?without loss (of information etc.)?, not ?loosely?. There > will be one last version with proofreading edits made. > > > > Regards, > > > > Chris. > > -- > > Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, > UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) > www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon > > > > *From:* Justine Chew [mailto:justine.chew at gmail.com] > *Sent:* 10 June 2015 16:19 > *To:* Rudi Vansnick; Dillon, Chris; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org > *Cc:* Lars Hoffmann > *Subject:* Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final version and call for > consensus > > > > Dear Chris, Rudi, > > > I am re-reading Final Report T&T.docx and while in my opinion, everything > is substantially in order, there are some formatting issues and spelling > errors for your attention: > > > > 1. Table of Contents - section 6. Community Input has renumbered itself to > 1. and so forth. > > 2. Chapter 1.1 Background - the open inverted comma that appears towards > the end of the 4th line is missing is close counterpart. This perhaps > should appear at the end of Chapter 1.1, ie. end of the 2nd bullet? > > 3. Chapter 1.3 Recommendation #3 on pg 4 - is reference to 'ccTLD' meant > to be included considering that our mission and scope only pertains to > contact information with respect to gTLDs? Where else is 'ccTLD' mentioned > except as a supporting example on pg 16? I thought our debate centered > purely on gLTDs. > > > > 4. Chapter 1.3 Recommendation #4 on pg 4 - 'policies' on the 4th line is > mis-spelt. Also the 2nd sentence on the 4th line seems to be 'hanging', > perhaps prefix it with "It is also assured that ....."? > > 5. Chapter 1.3 Recommendation #6 on pg 4 - the part of the sentence > beginning on the 3rd line reads funny. May I suggest it be reworded to read > as "... and its linguistic/script capacity expanded for receiving, ......"? > > 6. Chapter 1.3 Last paragraph on pg 4 - should be '... the question of who > should decide who should bear ....' i.e the words 'of who' have been > omitted. > > > > 7. Chapter 1.4 - I know that the Working Group has been abbreviated to > (WG) in para 1.2 but I think no where else is the abbreviation of WG used > in this document except for in chapter 1.4 - so can I please be pedantic > and ask that the 2 references to 'WG' - one in each paragraph - be amended > to 'Working Group'? > > 8. Chapter 3 - suffers the same issue as in Chapter 1.1 i.e. missing > closing inverted comma in 1st para. > > 9. Chapter 4 on pg 9 2nd para - to remove the word 'some' on the 4th line. > > 10. End of Chapter 5.1.2 on pg 17 - perhaps add the words 'although the > Working Group did not come to a conclusion as to who should decide who > should bear the said burden.' to properly address our non-answering of > Charter Q2. > > 11. Chapter 5.1.3 on pg 17 - the word 'borne' is mis-spelt; appears twice > in the 2nd paragraph. > > 12. Chapter 5.2.1 on pg 18 para 1 - 'losslessly'? You mean 'loosely'? > > > 13. Chapter 5.2.2 Recommendation #3 on pg 19 - see point 3 above, take out > reference to 'ccTLD'? > > 14. Chapter 5.2.2 Recommendation #4 on pg 19 - see point 4 above, > 'policies' is mis-spelt. > > 15. Chapter 5.2.2 Recommendation $6 on top of pg 20 - see point 5 above. > > 16. End of Chapter 5.2.2 re Charter Q2 - see point 6 above. > > I take it that the rest of the document contains text copied from a > reliable source. Also that Annex B is the same copy that was finalised > before. > > > Once again, I thank you for your hard work and dedication in leading the > WG to this Final Report. > > > Kind regards, > > Justine Chew > ----- > > > > On 10 June 2015 at 20:56, Rudi Vansnick wrote: > > Dear working group members, > > > > As co-chairs of the Translation and Transliteration Working Group, Chris > Dillon and I have reached the following conclusions: > > 1. All public comments have been reviewed and discussed by the WG > and a number of amendments were made to the Initial Report - as agreed to > by members of the Working Group. > > 2. There have been no objections to the Final Report communicated > on the WG list it was first sent to the WG on 5 June 2015 at 06:50 UTC with > a final response deadline of Tuesday 9 June 23:59 UTC. > > 3. Therefore, we determine that the Working Group has reached full > consensus on the Final Report as attached in clean and redline versions, > noting that the redline version highlights all edits made to the Initial > Report that was published for public comment in December 2015. > > > > All WG participants have until 12:00 UTC (noon) on Thursday 11 June 2015 > to object to the ?full consensus? call by the co-chairs. If anyone > objects, please explain your reasons. If no one objects in the allotted > time, the report will be sent by our Council Liaison to the GNSO Council > for their action along with a draft motion for its approval. > > > > If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rudi Vansnick > > Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) > > www.npoc.org > > > > rudi.vansnick at npoc.org > > Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 > > Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32 > > > > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Thu Jun 11 08:53:54 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:53:54 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T: Today's meeting Message-ID: Dear colleagues, Another thought. Following the passing of the consensus deadline at 23:59 UTC last night, it looks very much like we have full consensus. As Amr helpfully pointed out, however, the deadline, might have been somewhat tight for some among you. May I, therefore, encourage anyone who feels they cannot provide their consensus to indicate this on the list before 12:00 UTC today, so that we may deal with this effectively during the call and decide on the next steps. If all consent, it may be a relatively quick call with only minor edits and a reminder of the next steps. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu Thu Jun 11 12:54:13 2015 From: petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu (Petter Rindforth) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:54:13 GMT Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T: Today's meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1434027253229.123313.2784@webmail6> Dear All, Sorry for the late reply, i have been on travel some days this week. Just a short note, from the IPC point of view, that we still not support the suggested recommendation nr 1. IPC is of the view that it is desirable to maketransformation of contact information mandatory. I can, quickly after todays meeting, prepare a short ?minority note? on that, basically referring to the reasons IPS has previously put forward. I accept the other recommendations, however based on that the transformation is mandatory. Best, Petter --? Petter Rindforth, LL M Fenix Legal KB Stureplan 4c, 4tr 114 35 Stockholm Sweden Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 E-mail: petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu www.fenixlegal.eu NOTICE This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail. Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu Thank you 11 juni 2015, Dillon, Chris skrev: > > Dear colleagues, > > Another thought. > > Following the passing of the consensus deadline at 23:59 UTC last night, it looks very much like we have full consensus. As Amr helpfully pointed out, however, the deadline, might have been somewhat tight for some among you. May?I, therefore, encourage anyone who feels they cannot provide their consensusto indicate this on the list before 12:00 UTC today, so that we may deal with this effectively during the call and decide on the next steps. If all consent, it may be a relatively quick call with only minor edits and a reminder of the next steps. > > Regards, > > Chris. > -- > Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nathalie.peregrine at icann.org Thu Jun 11 15:22:49 2015 From: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org (Nathalie Peregrine) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:22:49 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] MP3 Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG meeting 11 June 2015 Message-ID: Dear All, Please find the MP3 recording for the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group call held on Thursday 11 June 2015 at 13:00 UTC at: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-transliteration-contact-11jun15-en.mp3 On page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#jun The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page:http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar Attendees: Chris Dillon ? NCSG Sara Bockey ? RrSG Justine Chew ? Individual Jim Galvin - RySG Rudi Vansnick - NPOC Amr Elsadr - NCUC Petter Rindforth ? IPC Peter Green (Zhang Zuan) ? NCUC Apologies: Peter Dernbach ICANN Staff Julie Hedlund Lars Hoffmann Nathalie Peregrine ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Wiki page: http://tinyurl.com/mpwxstx Thank you. Kind regards, Nathalie Adobe Chat Transcript for Thursday 11 June 2015: Nathalie Peregrine:Dear all, welcome to the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG call on the 11th June 2015 Petter Rindforth:As I just e-mailed: Just a short note, from the IPC point of view, that we still not support the suggested recommendation nr 1. IPC is of the view that it is desirable to make transformation of contact information mandatory. I can, quickly after todays meeting, prepare a short ?minority note? on that, basically referring to the reasons IPS has previously put forward. I accept the other recommendations, however based on that the transformation is mandatory. Rudi Vansnick:@Petter: and who should bear the cost in that case .? Nathalie Peregrine:Amr Elsadr has joined the call Amr Elsadr:@Petter: I imagined this to be the case, which is why I wanted to point out the option of a minority statement. Nathalie Peregrine:Justine Chew has joined the call Amr Elsadr:Rec#1 is the big one. Amr Elsadr:Rudi's right. The two recommendations have an association. Amr Elsadr:The association is actually between rec#1 and the text refering to the findings in relation to charter q.2 Amr Elsadr:@Chris: I have your same hearing problem. :) Petter Rindforth:Ok, "charter q2", I read it as q2.... Petter Rindforth:or rather recommendation 2 Petter Rindforth:You will get it today! Amr Elsadr:@Lars: Yes. Very true. Amr Elsadr:@Lars: Completely agree. Justine Chew:+1 Jim Julie Hedlund:@Jim and Amr: I have put some language from the Working Group Guidelines below the agenda. Julie Hedlund:On the right of the Adobe Connect screen. Amr Elsadr:@Julie: Thanks. Yes the consensus levels are defined in the GNSO Working Group Guidelines. Justine Chew:+1 Julie Amr Elsadr:@Lars: Yes. Thanks. I missed the public comment period prior to the board vote. I've got GNSO tunnel vision. :P Amr Elsadr:@Jim: Very true. :) Rudi Vansnick:do we have to do a vote ? Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: A vote is only necessary if the Chair(s) decide it is necessary. Normally, a vote is not conducted. The WG is supposed to reach consensus, not vote. Rudi Vansnick:thanks Amr Julie Hedlund:+1 Amr. The Guidelines say: "Care should be taken in using polls that they do not become votes. A liability with the use of polls is that, in situations where there is Divergence or Strong Opposition, there are often disagreements about the meanings of the poll questions or of the poll results." Julie Hedlund:++1 Amr! Rudi Vansnick:@Julie: thanks for clarifications Rudi Vansnick:Amr: that's what i"m afraid of .. Petter Rindforth:@Amr, I understand that you strongly support 4 - 5 different recommendations ;-) Rudi Vansnick:next steps : motion ? Amr Elsadr:Motion shouldn't be submitted until the minority statement is submitted and the consensus level is adjusted. Rudi Vansnick:Amr: +1 of course ;) Amr Elsadr:@Lars: Sounds good to me. Rudi Vansnick:many many thanks go to Chris, Lars and Julie and of course to all of you too Amr Elsadr:Note that when the board is considering GNSO adopted recommendations, the ACs (ALAC and GAC) can submit Advice that is contradictory to the GNSO recommendations. Just thought I'd add that. Rudi Vansnick:Amr : interesting ... Amr Elsadr:Not that I am in favour of that (in principle). Just wanted to note a possibility in the overall process. Justine Chew:I look forward to receiving an update through the email list on next steps so it's clear what is expected of the WG members, if any remains. Julie Hedlund:I want to echo all that Lars said. It has been a great pleasure and privilege to work with Chris and Rudi and all of you! Amr Elsadr:@Justine: WG members have the option to join an Implementation Review Team (IRT) to assist staff in implementation of the recommendations as they were intended by the GNSO/Board. This only begins after the Board adopts the recommendations and makes them actual policy. Amr Elsadr:And a big thanks to our co-chairs and all for the work over this past year and a half. Rudi Vansnick:so we have a few months off ;) Justine Chew:Yes, that's post this PDP - I was referring to the minority position for this final report. Amr Elsadr:And thanks to the great support (as always) from staff. :) Peter Green (CONAC):a year and a half ,thanks to Chris and Rudi Amr Elsadr:@Justine: Don't imagine there will be much to do as long as nothing in the report is changed. Just the consensus level on rec 1 and the minority statement. Justine Chew:@Amr, if you says so. Justine Chew:Bingo, thanks Amr! Justine Chew:Just that from what I heard of the push for minority position, it sounds like serious change. Justine Chew:+1 Amr Amr Elsadr:@Chris: Yes, we have been liberal, but time is tight right now. Justine Chew:@Chris - LOL Amr Elsadr:Wasn't only smiling in the chat room. :) Sara Bockey:Thank you all. This has been a great experience. Rudi Vansnick:save travels and see you in BA Justine Chew:Thanks all! Lovely to make all your acquantances Julie Hedlund:Bye everyone and thank you again! Jim Galvin:bye and thanks all! Amr Elsadr:Thanks all. Bye. Peter Green (CONAC):bye all Chris Dillon:Good bye all. Chris Dillon:I really shall miss these meetings! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu Thu Jun 11 16:53:36 2015 From: petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu (Petter Rindforth) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:53:36 GMT Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] T&T: Minority Statement In-Reply-To: <1434027253229.123313.2784@webmail6> References: <1434027253229.123313.2784@webmail6> Message-ID: <1434041616732.123313.5110@webmail6> Dear All, Thanks for a good meeting today. Please find enclosed the "Minority Statement", that I have added in red at page 19. I thought that was the best place, as it is where we start to inform about the "Level of consensus". Best, Petter --? Petter Rindforth, LL M Fenix Legal KB Stureplan 4c, 4tr 114 35 Stockholm Sweden Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 E-mail: petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu www.fenixlegal.eu NOTICE This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail. Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu Thank you 11 juni 2015, Petter Rindforth skrev: > Dear All, > > Sorry for the late reply, i have been on travel some days this week. > Just a short note, from the IPC point of view, that we still not support the suggested recommendation nr 1. IPC is of the view that it is desirable to maketransformation of contact information mandatory. > > I can, quickly after todays meeting, prepare a short ?minority note? on that, basically referring to the reasons IPS has previously put forward. > > I accept the other recommendations, however based on that the transformation is mandatory. > > Best, > Petter > --? > Petter Rindforth, LL M > > Fenix Legal KB > Stureplan 4c, 4tr > 114 35 Stockholm > Sweden > Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 > Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 > E-mail: petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu > www.fenixlegal.eu > > > NOTICE > This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail. > Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu > Thank you > > > 11 juni 2015, Dillon, Chris skrev: > > > > Dear colleagues, > > > > Another thought. > > > > Following the passing of the consensus deadline at 23:59 UTC last night, it looks very much like we have full consensus. As Amr helpfully pointed out, however, the deadline, might have been somewhat tight for some among you. May?I, therefore, encourage anyone who feels they cannot provide their consensusto indicate this on the list before 12:00 UTC today, so that we may deal with this effectively during the call and decide on the next steps. If all consent, it may be a relatively quick call with only minor edits and a reminder of the next steps. > > > > Regards, > > > > Chris. > > -- > > Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Minority Statement_Final Report T&T.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 522408 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lars.hoffmann at icann.org Fri Jun 12 10:05:48 2015 From: lars.hoffmann at icann.org (Lars Hoffmann) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:05:48 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final Report Message-ID: Dear all, Once again, I would like to thank you all for your hard work and dedication that made the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group a real pleasure to support. Special thanks goes out to the co-Chairs Chris Dillion and Rudi Vansnick who have led a PDP Working Group for the first time and I hope you agree with me that they have done an outstanding job and I very much hope this was not the last time they took on a leadership role within the GNSO community. Attached you find the Final Report ? please note that there were some very minor edits made to Petter?s text (p.19). This has of course been cleared with Petter. I have asked ICANN?s web-admin team to post the report online and as soon as that is done, the motion to the GNSO Council can be posted. Many thanks again for all your hard work, I hope I will see most of you in Buenos Aires or at another ICANN meeting in the not too distant future. Very best wishes Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Final Report Translation and Transliteration.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 1158670 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5091 bytes Desc: not available URL: From david.olive at icann.org Fri Jun 12 10:34:13 2015 From: david.olive at icann.org (David Olive) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:34:13 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final Report In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4C546F45-9518-466C-BF0C-774247B98FF6@icann.org> May I add my thanks to the GNSO WG Co-chairs and all those involved in addressing this important subject for ICANN and our policy development activities. Regards. David Sent from my iPhone David A. Olive Vice President, Policy Development Support General Manager, ICANN Regional Headquarters -Istanbul Hakki Yeten Cad. Selenium Plaza No:10/C K:10 34349 Fulya, Besiktas, Istanbul Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct Line: +90.212.999.6212 Mobile: + 1. 202.341.3611 Mobile: +90.533.341.6550 Email: david.olive at icann.org www.icann.org On Jun 12, 2015, at 1:09 PM, Lars Hoffmann > wrote: Dear all, Once again, I would like to thank you all for your hard work and dedication that made the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group a real pleasure to support. Special thanks goes out to the co-Chairs Chris Dillion and Rudi Vansnick who have led a PDP Working Group for the first time and I hope you agree with me that they have done an outstanding job and I very much hope this was not the last time they took on a leadership role within the GNSO community. Attached you find the Final Report - please note that there were some very minor edits made to Petter's text (p.19). This has of course been cleared with Petter. I have asked ICANN's web-admin team to post the report online and as soon as that is done, the motion to the GNSO Council can be posted. Many thanks again for all your hard work, I hope I will see most of you in Buenos Aires or at another ICANN meeting in the not too distant future. Very best wishes Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Fri Jun 12 11:05:53 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:05:53 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final Report In-Reply-To: <4C546F45-9518-466C-BF0C-774247B98FF6@icann.org> References: <4C546F45-9518-466C-BF0C-774247B98FF6@icann.org> Message-ID: Dear David and Lars and WG colleagues, Many thanks for your good wishes. When the working group started I was very much a learner. I feel less of one now as a result of the constant support I have had from ICANN staff, Lars, Julie and on occasion Mary and Marika, also from Rudi, and from the members of the working group. It has been a wonderful experience to learn how a PDP works and to get to know so many of you better. We really have a shared experience now! I shall be certainly be on the look out for work, especially in the Whois and internationalization areas and look forward to working with you again. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of David Olive Sent: 12 June 2015 11:34 To: Lars Hoffmann Cc: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final Report May I add my thanks to the GNSO WG Co-chairs and all those involved in addressing this important subject for ICANN and our policy development activities. Regards. David Sent from my iPhone David A. Olive Vice President, Policy Development Support General Manager, ICANN Regional Headquarters -Istanbul Hakki Yeten Cad. Selenium Plaza No:10/C K:10 34349 Fulya, Besiktas, Istanbul Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct Line: +90.212.999.6212 Mobile: + 1. 202.341.3611 Mobile: +90.533.341.6550 Email: david.olive at icann.org www.icann.org On Jun 12, 2015, at 1:09 PM, Lars Hoffmann > wrote: Dear all, Once again, I would like to thank you all for your hard work and dedication that made the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group a real pleasure to support. Special thanks goes out to the co-Chairs Chris Dillion and Rudi Vansnick who have led a PDP Working Group for the first time and I hope you agree with me that they have done an outstanding job and I very much hope this was not the last time they took on a leadership role within the GNSO community. Attached you find the Final Report - please note that there were some very minor edits made to Petter's text (p.19). This has of course been cleared with Petter. I have asked ICANN's web-admin team to post the report online and as soon as that is done, the motion to the GNSO Council can be posted. Many thanks again for all your hard work, I hope I will see most of you in Buenos Aires or at another ICANN meeting in the not too distant future. Very best wishes Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pdernbach at winklerpartners.com Fri Jun 12 10:56:32 2015 From: pdernbach at winklerpartners.com (Peter Dernbach) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:56:32 +0800 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final Report In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hear, Hear! Thanks to all the members of our working group and a special thanks to our co-chairs, and the ICANN staff that has provided such excellent support through the work of this PDP WG. Cheers, Peter Peter J.Dernbach ??? Partner ????(???????) *T* 886 (0)2 2311 2345 # 222 *F* 886 (0)2 2311 2688 www.winklerpartners.com pdernbach at winklerpartners.com ------------------------------ NOTICE: This email and any attachments contain private, confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or distribute the contents and are requested to delete them and to notify the sender. ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Lars Hoffmann wrote: > Dear all, > > Once again, I would like to thank you all for your hard work and > dedication that made the Translation and Transliteration of Contact > Information PDP Working Group a real pleasure to support. Special thanks > goes out to the co-Chairs Chris Dillion and Rudi Vansnick who have led a > PDP Working Group for the first time and I hope you agree with me that they > have done an outstanding job and I very much hope this was not the last > time they took on a leadership role within the GNSO community. > > Attached you find the Final Report ? please note that there were some very > minor edits made to Petter?s text (p.19). This has of course been cleared > with Petter. I have asked ICANN?s web-admin team to post the report online > and as soon as that is done, the motion to the GNSO Council can be posted. > > Many thanks again for all your hard work, I hope I will see most of you in > Buenos Aires or at another ICANN meeting in the not too distant future. > Very best wishes > Lars > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From julie.hedlund at icann.org Mon Jun 15 20:44:59 2015 From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:44:59 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final Report Message-ID: Dear all, As staff support I would like to echo the comments from Lars below. It really has been both a pleasure and privilege to work with all of you, and especially Chris and Rudi! Kind regards, Julie From: Lars Hoffmann Date: Friday, June 12, 2015 6:05 AM To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final Report > Dear all, > > Once again, I would like to thank you all for your hard work and dedication > that made the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP > Working Group a real pleasure to support. Special thanks goes out to the > co-Chairs Chris Dillion and Rudi Vansnick who have led a PDP Working Group for > the first time and I hope you agree with me that they have done an outstanding > job and I very much hope this was not the last time they took on a leadership > role within the GNSO community. > > Attached you find the Final Report ? please note that there were some very > minor edits made to Petter?s text (p.19). This has of course been cleared with > Petter. I have asked ICANN?s web-admin team to post the report online and as > soon as that is done, the motion to the GNSO Council can be posted. > > Many thanks again for all your hard work, I hope I will see most of you in > Buenos Aires or at another ICANN meeting in the not too distant future. > Very best wishes > Lars > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5041 bytes Desc: not available URL: From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Tue Jun 16 07:38:31 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 07:38:31 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final Report In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Julie, Thank you for your good wishes. It was a real pleasure to work with you and the other colleagues on the T&T. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: 15 June 2015 21:45 To: Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final Report Dear all, As staff support I would like to echo the comments from Lars below. It really has been both a pleasure and privilege to work with all of you, and especially Chris and Rudi! Kind regards, Julie From: Lars Hoffmann > Date: Friday, June 12, 2015 6:05 AM To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Final Report Dear all, Once again, I would like to thank you all for your hard work and dedication that made the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group a real pleasure to support. Special thanks goes out to the co-Chairs Chris Dillion and Rudi Vansnick who have led a PDP Working Group for the first time and I hope you agree with me that they have done an outstanding job and I very much hope this was not the last time they took on a leadership role within the GNSO community. Attached you find the Final Report - please note that there were some very minor edits made to Petter's text (p.19). This has of course been cleared with Petter. I have asked ICANN's web-admin team to post the report online and as soon as that is done, the motion to the GNSO Council can be posted. Many thanks again for all your hard work, I hope I will see most of you in Buenos Aires or at another ICANN meeting in the not too distant future. Very best wishes Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lars.hoffmann at icann.org Sat Jun 20 19:10:29 2015 From: lars.hoffmann at icann.org (Lars Hoffmann) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 19:10:29 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Message-ID: Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term ?verified? in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of ?verification?. Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term ?validate? not ?verifiy? and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council?s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday?s Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5091 bytes Desc: not available URL: From sbockey at godaddy.com Sat Jun 20 19:14:44 2015 From: sbockey at godaddy.com (Sara Bockey) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 19:14:44 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Message-ID: I consent to this change. Thank you, Lars. Sara From: Lars Hoffmann > Date: Saturday, June 20, 2015 at 4:10 PM To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term ?verified? in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of ?verification?. Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term ?validate? not ?verifiy? and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council?s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday?s Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From aelsadr at egyptig.org Sat Jun 20 19:40:28 2015 From: aelsadr at egyptig.org (Amr Elsadr) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 21:40:28 +0200 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Also in favour of making this change. Apologies for my part in the confusion on this. Thanks. Amr On Jun 20, 2015, at 9:14 PM, Sara Bockey wrote: > I consent to this change. > > Thank you, Lars. > > Sara > > From: Lars Hoffmann > Date: Saturday, June 20, 2015 at 4:10 PM > To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! > > Dear all, > > Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. > > It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report > > The Recommendation reads currently: > > Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. > Level of consensus: Full Consensus > > The term ?verified? in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of ?verification?. Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term ?validate? not ?verifiy? and it should be changed accordingly. > > With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council?s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday?s Council discussion and vote. > > Many thanks and best wishes, > Lars > > From rudi.vansnick at isoc.be Sat Jun 20 19:50:53 2015 From: rudi.vansnick at isoc.be (Rudi Vansnick) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 16:50:53 -0300 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9FBA7D16-7D2D-4B99-B3B9-BEF428A215D5@isoc.be> I?m also in favor to make the change, so the text is in line with the RAA. May I call on all of you, members of this WG to reply asap (and within the next 24 hours) so we can proceed with the administration of the motion process and get the report voted. Rudi Vansnick > Op 20-jun.-2015, om 16:10 heeft Lars Hoffmann het volgende geschreven: > > Dear all, > > Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. > > It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report > > The Recommendation reads currently: > > Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. > Level of consensus: Full Consensus > > The term ?verified? in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of ?verification?. Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term ?validate? not ?verifiy? and it should be changed accordingly. > > With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council?s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday?s Council discussion and vote. > > Many thanks and best wishes, > Lars > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 496 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From wanawit at etda.or.th Sat Jun 20 20:06:52 2015 From: wanawit at etda.or.th (Wanawit Ahkuputra) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 20:06:52 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Message-ID: Dear Lars, I consent the change on Recommendation #4. Regards, Wanawit Ahkuputra Deputy Executive Director ETDA Electronic Transactions Development Agency (Public Organization) Mob.: +668 9301 8818 Email: wanawit at etda.or.th From: on behalf of Lars Hoffmann Date: Saturday, June 20, 2015 at 16:10 To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term ?verified? in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of ?verification?. Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term ?validate? not ?verifiy? and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council?s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday?s Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2268 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jgalvin at afilias.info Sat Jun 20 20:35:52 2015 From: jgalvin at afilias.info (James Galvin) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 17:35:52 -0300 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5585CEA8.1090004@afilias.info> I was there during the presentation to the GNSO Council when this was discovered. I believe this was an editorial misstep on the part of the working group and that there was no intention to suggest such a material change to obligations that are beyond the remit of this working group. I support the change as proposed below. Jim On 6/20/15 4:10 PM, Lars Hoffmann wrote: > Dear all, > > Please all read this careful and*try to reply on list as soon as possible*. > > It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly > used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report > > The Recommendation reads currently: > > */Recommendation #4/*/ The Working Group recommends that, regardless of > the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are > consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), > relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any > other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are > verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements > and the language/script used must be easily identifiable./ > > */Level of consensus: Full Consensus/* > > The term ?verified? in the second sentence of the recommendation has > legal implications and would change significantly the contractual > obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final > Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was > intended to be used instead of ?verification?. Both co-Chairs agree > that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the > term ?validate? _not_ ?verifiy? and it should be changed accordingly. > > With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual > meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent > delaying the GNSO Council?s vote on our Final Report, this would have to > happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed > accordingly and in time for Wednesday?s Council discussion and vote. > > Many thanks and best wishes, > > Lars > > From wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de Sat Jun 20 20:58:56 2015 From: wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de (WUKnoben) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 17:58:56 -0300 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! In-Reply-To: <9FBA7D16-7D2D-4B99-B3B9-BEF428A215D5@isoc.be> References: <9FBA7D16-7D2D-4B99-B3B9-BEF428A215D5@isoc.be> Message-ID: <1CAAA3CCFECC4B82950634DF100316BF@WUKPC> I also agree. Wolf-Ulrich From: Rudi Vansnick Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 4:50 PM To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Cc: Lars Hoffmann Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! I?m also in favor to make the change, so the text is in line with the RAA. May I call on all of you, members of this WG to reply asap (and within the next 24 hours) so we can proceed with the administration of the motion process and get the report voted. Rudi Vansnick Op 20-jun.-2015, om 16:10 heeft Lars Hoffmann het volgende geschreven: Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term ?verified? in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of ?verification?. Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term ?validate? not ?verifiy? and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council?s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday?s Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From zhangzuan at conac.cn Sat Jun 20 23:42:43 2015 From: zhangzuan at conac.cn (=?UTF-8?B?5byg6ZK7?=) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 07:42:43 +0800 (GMT+08:00) Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <27a88e36.b8e.14e135a52e0.Coremail.zhangzuan@conac.cn> Hi Lars, Hi everyone, I agree to immediately make this IMPORTANT change. Thank you. Best Zhang Zuan / Peter Green -----????----- ???:"Lars Hoffmann" ????:2015-06-21 03:10:29 (???) ???: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" ??: ??: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term ?verified? in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of ?verification?. Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term ?validate? not ?verifiy? and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council?s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday?s Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars -- ??????????????????????????? ??? ?? ? ??010-6900 1156 Email?zhangzuan at conac.cn ? ??http://www.conac.cn ? ????????????15??6??????417? ? ??100088 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From justine.chew at gmail.com Sat Jun 20 23:54:17 2015 From: justine.chew at gmail.com (Justine Chew) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 07:54:17 +0800 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I consent to the change, ie to the use of "validate". Thanks, Justine Chew ----- On 21 Jun 2015 03:16, "Sara Bockey" wrote: > I consent to this change. > > Thank you, Lars. > > Sara > > From: Lars Hoffmann > Date: Saturday, June 20, 2015 at 4:10 PM > To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 > - REPLY NEEDED! > > Dear all, > > > > Please all read this careful and* try to reply on list as soon as > possible*. > > > > It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly > used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report > > > > The Recommendation reads currently: > > > > *Recommendation #4** The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the > language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are > consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), > relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other > applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in > accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the > language/script used must be easily identifiable.* > > *Level of consensus: Full Consensus* > > > > The term ?verified? in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal > implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of > the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that > particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used > instead of ?verification?. Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical > mistake as the Group meant to use the term ?validate? *not* ?verifiy? and > it should be changed accordingly. > > > > With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual > meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying > the GNSO Council?s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as > soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and > in time for Wednesday?s Council discussion and vote. > > > > Many thanks and best wishes, > > Lars > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From justine.chew at gmail.com Sat Jun 20 23:58:05 2015 From: justine.chew at gmail.com (Justine Chew) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 07:58:05 +0800 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Lars, I consent to the change, ie to the use of "validate". Thanks, Justine Chew ----- On 21 Jun 2015 03:12, "Lars Hoffmann" wrote: > Dear all, > > > > Please all read this careful and* try to reply on list as soon as > possible*. > > > > It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly > used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report > > > > The Recommendation reads currently: > > > > *Recommendation #4** The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the > language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are > consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), > relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other > applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in > accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the > language/script used must be easily identifiable.* > > *Level of consensus: Full Consensus* > > > > The term ?verified? in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal > implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of > the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that > particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used > instead of ?verification?. Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical > mistake as the Group meant to use the term ?validate? *not* ?verifiy? and > it should be changed accordingly. > > > > With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual > meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying > the GNSO Council?s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as > soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and > in time for Wednesday?s Council discussion and vote. > > > > Many thanks and best wishes, > > Lars > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pdernbach at winklerpartners.com Sun Jun 21 02:10:51 2015 From: pdernbach at winklerpartners.com (Peter Dernbach) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 10:10:51 +0800 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I consent to the change as well. Peter Peter J.Dernbach ??? Partner ????(???????) *T* 886 (0)2 2311 2345 # 222 *F* 886 (0)2 2311 2688 www.winklerpartners.com pdernbach at winklerpartners.com ------------------------------ NOTICE: This email and any attachments contain private, confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or distribute the contents and are requested to delete them and to notify the sender. ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Justine Chew wrote: > Lars, > > I consent to the change, ie to the use of "validate". > > Thanks, > > Justine Chew > ----- > On 21 Jun 2015 03:12, "Lars Hoffmann" wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> >> >> Please all read this careful and* try to reply on list as soon as >> possible*. >> >> >> >> It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly >> used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report >> >> >> >> The Recommendation reads currently: >> >> >> >> *Recommendation #4** The Working Group recommends that, regardless of >> the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are >> consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), >> relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other >> applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in >> accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the >> language/script used must be easily identifiable.* >> >> *Level of consensus: Full Consensus* >> >> >> >> The term ?verified? in the second sentence of the recommendation has >> legal implications and would change significantly the contractual >> obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final >> Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was >> intended to be used instead of ?verification?. Both co-Chairs agree >> that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the >> term ?validate? *not* ?verifiy? and it should be changed accordingly. >> >> >> >> With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual >> meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying >> the GNSO Council?s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as >> soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and >> in time for Wednesday?s Council discussion and vote. >> >> >> >> Many thanks and best wishes, >> >> Lars >> >> >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lars.hoffmann at icann.org Sun Jun 21 03:08:57 2015 From: lars.hoffmann at icann.org (Lars Hoffmann) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 03:08:57 +0000 Subject: Fwd: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! In-Reply-To: <007a01d0abae$5cdcae50$16960af0$@registry.asia> References: <007a01d0abae$5cdcae50$16960af0$@registry.asia> Message-ID: <68010F8D-BF9D-4018-9EC6-F88C45EB2D79@icann.org> Dear all, Please find Jennifer's consent below. Best. Lars Begin forwarded message: From: "Jennifer Chung" > Date: 20 Jun 2015 20:10:00 GMT-3 To: "'Lars Hoffmann'" >, > Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Dear Lars, Since I still haven't received the email from the mailing list - might be a subscription problem? I would like to record my consent to the change suggested in your email below (pasted in its entirety). Also in the case that this does not make it to the mailing list (subscription problem?) please forward my response to the list. Thank you! Best Regards, [dotasia-signature] Jennifer Chung, Policy & Organisational Relations DotAsia Organisation, From.Asia / For.Asia E-mail: jen at dot.asia Skype: jennifer.r.chung ---------- Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term OEverified^1 in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of ^3verification^2. Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term OEvalidate^1 not OEverifiy^1 and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council^1s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday^1s Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2036 bytes Desc: image003.jpg URL: From emily.taylor at netistrar.com Sun Jun 21 08:27:02 2015 From: emily.taylor at netistrar.com (Emily Taylor) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 09:27:02 +0100 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! In-Reply-To: <68010F8D-BF9D-4018-9EC6-F88C45EB2D79@icann.org> References: <007a01d0abae$5cdcae50$16960af0$@registry.asia> <68010F8D-BF9D-4018-9EC6-F88C45EB2D79@icann.org> Message-ID: Dear Lars Thank you for your note. I confirm my consent to the change. Kind regards Emily On 21 June 2015 at 04:08, Lars Hoffmann wrote: > Dear all, > Please find Jennifer's consent below. > Best. Lars > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > *From:* "Jennifer Chung" > *Date:* 20 Jun 2015 20:10:00 GMT-3 > *To:* "'Lars Hoffmann'" , < > gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org> > *Subject:* *Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to > Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED!* > > Dear Lars, > > > > Since I still haven?t received the email from the mailing list ? might be > a subscription problem? I would like to record my consent to the change > suggested in your email below (pasted in its entirety). > > > > Also in the case that this does not make it to the mailing list > (subscription problem?) please forward my response to the list. Thank you! > > > > Best Regards, > > > > [image: dotasia-signature] > > *Jennifer Chung*, *Policy & Organisational Relations* > > DotAsia Organisation , From.Asia / For.Asia > > E-mail: jen at dot.asia > > Skype: jennifer.r.chung > > > > > > ---------- > > Dear all, > > Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as > possible. > > It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly > > used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report > > The Recommendation reads currently: > > Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the > > language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are > > consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), > > relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other > > applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in > > accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the > > language/script used must be easily identifiable. > > Level of consensus: Full Consensus > > The term ?verified? in the second sentence of the recommendation has > legal > > implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of > > the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that > > particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used > > instead of ?verification?. Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical > > mistake as the Group meant to use the term ?validate? not ?verifiy? and it > > should be changed accordingly. > > With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual > > meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying > > the GNSO Council?s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as > > soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and > > in time for Wednesday?s Council discussion and vote. > > Many thanks and best wishes, > > Lars > > > > > -- Emily Taylor *MA(Cantab), MBA* Director *Netistrar Ltd *- Domain Names at Trade Prices W: http://www.netistrar.com | M: 07540 049322 | T: 01283 617808 Repton House, Bretby Business Park, Bretby, Derbyshire, DE15 0YZ Registered in England and Wales No. 08735583. VAT No. 190062332 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Sun Jun 21 12:28:39 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 12:28:39 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Message-ID: Dear colleagues, Thank you for your prompt dealing with this matter! Much appreciated. It is to be hoped that this will avoid delay, Please confirm you are happy with Lars' correction below, if you have not already done so. Regards, Chris. == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: Lars Hoffmann > Date: Saturday, 20 June 2015 16:10 To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term 'verified' in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of "verification". Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term 'validate' not 'verifiy' and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council's vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday's Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu Sun Jun 21 13:48:17 2015 From: petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu (Petter Rindforth) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 13:48:17 GMT Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <1434894497776.128937.912@webmail1> Dear All, I hereby consent to this correction (clarification). Best,P?etter --? Petter Rindforth, LL M Fenix Legal KB Stureplan 4c, 4tr 114 35 Stockholm Sweden Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 E-mail: petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu www.fenixlegal.eu NOTICE This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail. Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu Thank you 20 juni 2015, Lars Hoffmann skrev: > > > > Dear all, > > Please all read this careful andtry to reply on list as soon as possible. > > It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report > > The Recommendation reads currently: > > Recommendation #4The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified,?in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. > Level of consensus: Full Consensus > > The term??verified? in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As thesubstance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of?verification?. Bothco-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term??validate? not ?verifiy? and it should be changed accordingly. > > With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council?s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday?s Council discussion and vote. > > Many thanks and best wishes, > Lars > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rcarney at godaddy.com Sun Jun 21 15:56:37 2015 From: rcarney at godaddy.com (Roger D Carney) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 15:56:37 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Good Afternoon, I agree and support the necessary correction from "verified" to "validated" in recommendation #4. Thanks Roger From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of Dillon, Chris Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2015 7:29 AM To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Cc: Lars Hoffmann Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Importance: High Dear colleagues, Thank you for your prompt dealing with this matter! Much appreciated. It is to be hoped that this will avoid delay, Please confirm you are happy with Lars' correction below, if you have not already done so. Regards, Chris. == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: Lars Hoffmann > Date: Saturday, 20 June 2015 16:10 To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term 'verified' in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of "verification". Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term 'validate' not 'verifiy' and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council's vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday's Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Sun Jun 21 15:41:17 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 15:41:17 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Message-ID: Dear colleagues, Many thanks for your work on this urgent issue at such a busy time. As Co-Chair, I would like to determine that we have reached full consensus on the correction to Recommednation #4 on pages 4 (Executive Summary) and 20 (full text recommendations). Regards, Chris. == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term 'verified' in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of "verification". Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term 'validate' not 'verifiy' and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council's vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday's Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lars.hoffmann at icann.org Sun Jun 21 17:52:06 2015 From: lars.hoffmann at icann.org (Lars Hoffmann) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 17:52:06 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] FW: [council] Final Report Translation and Transliteration Correction In-Reply-To: <18294887-9A68-4ECC-BA28-EE90A85772F9@blacknight.com> References: <18294887-9A68-4ECC-BA28-EE90A85772F9@blacknight.com> Message-ID: Dear all, Please find below the note that has gone out to the Council as well as a thank you from Michele Neylon that I would very much like to echo! Very best. Lars From: Michele Neylon - Blacknight Date: Sunday, 21 June 2015 14:47 To: Lars HOFFMANN , Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Final Report Translation and Transliteration Correction Lars Thanks for the update and please thank the WG for their quick turnaround on this. Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://www.blacknight.press - get our latest news & media coverage http://www.technology.ie Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Social: http://mneylon.social Random Stuff: http://www.michele.irish ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: on behalf of Lars Hoffmann Date: Sunday 21 June 2015 14:32 To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Final Report Translation and Transliteration Correction Dear Councillors, Please find below an important note from the co-Chair of the Translation and Translation of Contact Information PDP WG conerning a correction of their Final Report that is currently under Council consideration. Many thanks Lars From: "Dillon, Chris" Date: Sunday, 21 June 2015 14:21 To: Lars HOFFMANN Cc: Rudi Vansnick Subject: FW: Final Report Correction Dear Councillors, During the presentation of the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group to the GNSO on Saturday, 20 June 2015, it emerged that the Group had made a clerical error in its Recommendation #4 (both in the Executive Summary (page 4) and the body of the Report (page 20). This error has been corrected and the correction has been consented to by the WG members (see WG Mailing List Archive ). The corrected Final Report has been posted on the WG Wiki Page and on the WG Project Page and is also attached to this email. The Group apologises for this clerical error and hopes the Council will consider the corrected version during its Wednesday public meeting. Many thanks. Chris Dillon and Rudi Vansnick. Co-Chairs of the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5091 bytes Desc: not available URL: From phaddad at sabaip.com Mon Jun 22 19:43:24 2015 From: phaddad at sabaip.com (Pascal Haddad) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 19:43:24 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: Dear all I know I am too late for this but I just want to confirm that I also agree on the necessary correction in recommendation #4. Thanks ________________________________ From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of Dillon, Chris Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2015 7:29 AM To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Cc: Lars Hoffmann Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Importance: High Dear colleagues, Thank you for your prompt dealing with this matter! Much appreciated. It is to be hoped that this will avoid delay, Please confirm you are happy with Lars? correction below, if you have not already done so. Regards, Chris. == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599[X] (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: Lars Hoffmann > Date: Saturday, 20 June 2015 16:10 To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term ?verified? in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of ?verification?. Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term ?validate? not ?verifiy? and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council?s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday?s Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars
- UAE: Official fees for trademark matters have doubled almost across the board in comparison with their current level effective as of May 29, 2015. The increase will also affect patent filings and title updates. Trademark owners should attend to any renewal due over the next 12 months at the existing rates prior to the increase.

- Yemen: In order to avoid delays resulting from interruptions in the mail and courier services, applicants are able to file scanned copies of supporting documents while submitting the legalized copies as soon as available. Also, given that some Yemeni Consulates are refraining from legalization at this stage, notarized documents can be filed pending further submission of the legalized documents once possible.

- Lebanon: All POA submissions after April 10, 2015 must be legalized.

For more information on this or on general IP matters in our region, please contact news at sabaip.com

The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential intended for the use of the individual or entity name above. Any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Mon Jun 22 20:42:42 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:42:42 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: No problem at all, Haddad, and thank you. Every indication that this thing is solved is music to my ears! Regards, Chris. == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: Pascal Haddad > Date: Monday, 22 June 2015 16:43 To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Dear all I know I am too late for this but I just want to confirm that I also agree on the necessary correction in recommendation #4. Thanks ________________________________ From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of Dillon, Chris Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2015 7:29 AM To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Cc: Lars Hoffmann Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Importance: High Dear colleagues, Thank you for your prompt dealing with this matter! Much appreciated. It is to be hoped that this will avoid delay, Please confirm you are happy with Lars' correction below, if you have not already done so. Regards, Chris. == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599[X] (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: Lars Hoffmann > Date: Saturday, 20 June 2015 16:10 To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term 'verified' in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of "verification". Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term 'validate' not 'verifiy' and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council's vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday's Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars ________________________________ - UAE: Official fees for trademark matters have doubled almost across the board in comparison with their current level effective as of May 29, 2015. The increase will also affect patent filings and title updates. Trademark owners should attend to any renewal due over the next 12 months at the existing rates prior to the increase. - Yemen: In order to avoid delays resulting from interruptions in the mail and courier services, applicants are able to file scanned copies of supporting documents while submitting the legalized copies as soon as available. Also, given that some Yemeni Consulates are refraining from legalization at this stage, notarized documents can be filed pending further submission of the legalized documents once possible. - Lebanon: All POA submissions after April 10, 2015 must be legalized. For more information on this or on general IP matters in our region, please contact news at sabaip.com ________________________________ The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential intended for the use of the individual or entity name above. Any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From vgreimann at key-Systems.net Mon Jun 22 22:02:42 2015 From: vgreimann at key-Systems.net (Volker Greimann - Key-Systems GmbHz) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 19:02:42 -0300 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear working group members, i cannot thank you enough for you willingness to make this amendment as quickly as you have. I fully indend on supporting this motion in the registrar stakeholder group meeting tomorrow and changing the language made this possible. I apologize for not noticing this issue any sooner. Best regards, Volker Greimann Sent from my iPad > On 22 Jun 2015, at 17:42, Dillon, Chris wrote: > > No problem at all, Haddad, and thank you. Every indication that this thing is solved is music to my ears! > > Regards, > > Chris. > == > Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon > > From: Pascal Haddad > Date: Monday, 22 June 2015 16:43 > To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! > > Dear all > > I know I am too late for this but I just want to confirm that I also agree on the necessary correction in recommendation #4. > > Thanks > > > From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of Dillon, Chris > Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2015 7:29 AM > To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org > Cc: Lars Hoffmann > Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! > Importance: High > > Dear colleagues, > > Thank you for your prompt dealing with this matter! Much appreciated. It is to be hoped that this will avoid delay, > > Please confirm you are happy with Lars? correction below, if you have not already done so. > > Regards, > > Chris. > == > Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon > > From: Lars Hoffmann > Date: Saturday, 20 June 2015 16:10 > To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! > > Dear all, > > Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. > > It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report > > The Recommendation reads currently: > > Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. > Level of consensus: Full Consensus > > The term ?verified? in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of ?verification?. Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term ?validate? not ?verifiy? and it should be changed accordingly. > > With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council?s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday?s Council discussion and vote. > > Many thanks and best wishes, > Lars > > > - UAE: Official fees for trademark matters have doubled almost across the board in comparison with their current level effective as of May 29, 2015. The increase will also affect patent filings and title updates. Trademark owners should attend to any renewal due over the next 12 months at the existing rates prior to the increase. > > - Yemen: In order to avoid delays resulting from interruptions in the mail and courier services, applicants are able to file scanned copies of supporting documents while submitting the legalized copies as soon as available. Also, given that some Yemeni Consulates are refraining from legalization at this stage, notarized documents can be filed pending further submission of the legalized documents once possible. > > - Lebanon: All POA submissions after April 10, 2015 must be legalized. > > For more information on this or on general IP matters in our region, please contact news at sabaip.com > > The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential intended for the use of the individual or entity name above. Any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Mon Jun 22 22:32:19 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:32:19 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Volker, We?re really grateful that you spotted it and also for your support with the registrars. With all best wishes, Chris. == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: Volker Greimann - Key-Systems GmbHz > Date: Monday, 22 June 2015 19:02 To: Chris Dillon > Cc: Pascal Haddad >, "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Dear working group members, i cannot thank you enough for you willingness to make this amendment as quickly as you have. I fully indend on supporting this motion in the registrar stakeholder group meeting tomorrow and changing the language made this possible. I apologize for not noticing this issue any sooner. Best regards, Volker Greimann Sent from my iPad On 22 Jun 2015, at 17:42, Dillon, Chris > wrote: No problem at all, Haddad, and thank you. Every indication that this thing is solved is music to my ears! Regards, Chris. == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: Pascal Haddad > Date: Monday, 22 June 2015 16:43 To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Dear all I know I am too late for this but I just want to confirm that I also agree on the necessary correction in recommendation #4. Thanks ________________________________ From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of Dillon, Chris Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2015 7:29 AM To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Cc: Lars Hoffmann Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Importance: High Dear colleagues, Thank you for your prompt dealing with this matter! Much appreciated. It is to be hoped that this will avoid delay, Please confirm you are happy with Lars? correction below, if you have not already done so. Regards, Chris. == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599[X] (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: Lars Hoffmann > Date: Saturday, 20 June 2015 16:10 To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] URGENT Correction to Recommendation 4 - REPLY NEEDED! Dear all, Please all read this careful and try to reply on list as soon as possible. It has come to our attention that there was an important term mistakenly used in Recommendation #4 of our Final Report The Recommendation reads currently: Recommendation #4 The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant L Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are verified, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable. Level of consensus: Full Consensus The term ?verified? in the second sentence of the recommendation has legal implications and would change significantly the contractual obligations of the Contracted Parties. As the substance of the Final Report on that particular issue makes it clear that "validation" was intended to be used instead of ?verification?. Both co-Chairs agree that this is a clerical mistake as the Group meant to use the term ?validate? not ?verifiy? and it should be changed accordingly. With your consent we would like change the working to reflect the actual meaning of what the Group meant to recommend. In order to prevent delaying the GNSO Council?s vote on our Final Report, this would have to happen as soon as possible so that the Motion to adopt can be changed accordingly and in time for Wednesday?s Council discussion and vote. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars ________________________________ - UAE: Official fees for trademark matters have doubled almost across the board in comparison with their current level effective as of May 29, 2015. The increase will also affect patent filings and title updates. Trademark owners should attend to any renewal due over the next 12 months at the existing rates prior to the increase. - Yemen: In order to avoid delays resulting from interruptions in the mail and courier services, applicants are able to file scanned copies of supporting documents while submitting the legalized copies as soon as available. Also, given that some Yemeni Consulates are refraining from legalization at this stage, notarized documents can be filed pending further submission of the legalized documents once possible. - Lebanon: All POA submissions after April 10, 2015 must be legalized. For more information on this or on general IP matters in our region, please contact news at sabaip.com ________________________________ The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential intended for the use of the individual or entity name above. Any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Glen at icann.org Wed Jun 24 20:02:15 2015 From: Glen at icann.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Glen_de_Saint_G=E9ry?=) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:02:15 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council Resolutions 24 June 2015 Message-ID: <28a087af3edd452695dc9f4db3beed75@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> FYI 3. Adoption of the GNSO Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group Final Report and Recommendations Whereas 1. On 13 June 2013, the GNSO Council launched a Policy Development Process (PDP) on Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information [http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201306] addressing the following two Charter questions: a) Whether it is desirable to translate contact information to a single common language or transliterate contact information to a single common script. b) Who should decide who should bear the burden translating contact information to a single common language or transliterating contact information to a single common script. 2. This PDP has followed the prescribed PDP steps as stated in the Bylaws, resulting in a Final Report delivered on 12 June 2015; 3. The Translation and Transliteration PDP has reached consensus on one recommendation and full consensus on the six remaining recommendations in relation to the two issues outlined above; 4. The GNSO Council has reviewed and discussed these recommendations. Resolved, 1. The GNSO Council recommends to the ICANN Board of Directors the adoption of the recommendations (#1 through #7) as detailed in the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information Final Report. 2. On 21 June, the Translation and Transliteration PDP Working Group Working Group notified the Council of a clerical error in the text of Recommendation #4 of the Final Report, which has been edited as follows: "The Working Group recommends that, regardless of the language(s)/script(s) used, it is assured that the data fields are consistent to standards in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA), relevant Consensus Policy, Additional Whois Information Policy (AWIP) and any other applicable polices. Entered contact information data are [verified] validated, in accordance with the aforementioned Policies and Agreements and the language/script used must be easily identifiable." The Recommendation with the corrected text has reached full consensus in the Working Group because the correction is needed to reflect the substance of Working Group's deliberations documented in the Final Report. The corrected Final Report has been posted to the GNSO Council and posted to the GNSO Website: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/transliteration-contact 3. The GNSO Council shall convene a Translation and Transliteration of Contact information Implementation Review Team to assist ICANN Staff in developing the implementation details for the new policy should it be approved by the ICANN Board. The Implementation Review Team will be tasked with evaluating the proposed implementation of the policy recommendations as approved by the Board and is expected to work with ICANN Staff to ensure that the resultant implementation fulfills the intentions of the approved policies. If the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information Review Team identifies any potential modifications to the policy or new policy recommendations, the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information Implementation Review Team shall refer these to the GNSO Council for its consideration and follow-up, as appropriate. Following adoption by the ICANN Board of the recommendations, the GNSO Secretariat is authorized to issue a call for volunteers for a Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information Implementation Review Team to the members of Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint G?ry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lars.hoffmann at icann.org Wed Jun 24 20:30:09 2015 From: lars.hoffmann at icann.org (Lars Hoffmann) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:30:09 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Message-ID: Dear all, This is to inform you that the GNSO Council has passed the Final Report of the T&T PDP Working Group unanimously. I will share the procedural path towards the ICANN Board vote with you in the next days. Many thanks again for all your hard work and very best wishes, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5091 bytes Desc: not available URL: From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Wed Jun 24 20:45:22 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:45:22 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Message-ID: Dear all, Many thanks to all of you - WG members and staff who worked on this over the months. You may also find today's results at: https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/ With all best wishes, Chris. == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: > on behalf of Lars Hoffmann > Date: Wednesday, 24 June 2015 17:30 To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Dear all, This is to inform you that the GNSO Council has passed the Final Report of the T&T PDP Working Group unanimously. I will share the procedural path towards the ICANN Board vote with you in the next days. Many thanks again for all your hard work and very best wishes, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pdernbach at winklerpartners.com Thu Jun 25 01:38:04 2015 From: pdernbach at winklerpartners.com (Peter J. Dernbach) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:38:04 +0800 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4C789ACE-90C0-4888-9FDC-6DA6D1252E55@winklerpartners.com> Thanks to you all, particularly our excellent co-chairs Chris and Rudi and the great support from ICANN staff Julie, Lars, Nathalie and all. Cheers, Peter > "Dillon, Chris" ? 2015/6/25 ??4:45 ??? > > Dear all, > > Many thanks to all of you ? WG members and staff who worked on this over the months. > > You may also find today?s results at: > https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/ > With all best wishes, > > Chris. > > == > > Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon > > From: on behalf of Lars Hoffmann > Date: Wednesday, 24 June 2015 17:30 > To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report > > Dear all, > This is to inform you that the GNSO Council has passed the Final Report of the T&T PDP Working Group unanimously. I will share the procedural path towards the ICANN Board vote with you in the next days. > Many thanks again for all your hard work and very best wishes, > Lars > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From julie.hedlund at icann.org Thu Jun 25 15:10:32 2015 From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:10:32 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report In-Reply-To: <4C789ACE-90C0-4888-9FDC-6DA6D1252E55@winklerpartners.com> References: <4C789ACE-90C0-4888-9FDC-6DA6D1252E55@winklerpartners.com> Message-ID: Thanks so much Peter! It's been a pleasure to work with you, Chris, Rudi and all the other PDP WG members! Cheers, Julie From: "Peter J. Dernbach" Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 10:38 PM To: "Dillon, Chris" Cc: Lars Hoffmann , "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report > Thanks to you all, particularly our excellent co-chairs Chris and Rudi and the > great support from ICANN staff Julie, Lars, Nathalie and all. > > Cheers, > Peter > > "Dillon, Chris" ? 2015/6/25 ??4:45 ??? > >> Dear all, >> >> Many thanks to all of you ? WG members and staff who worked on this over the >> months. >> >> You may also find today?s results at: >> https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/ >> With all best wishes, >> Chris. >> == >> Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, >> UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) >> ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon >> From: on behalf of Lars Hoffmann >> >> Date: Wednesday, 24 June 2015 17:30 >> To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" >> Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report >> >> Dear all, >> This is to inform you that the GNSO Council has passed the Final Report of >> the T&T PDP Working Group unanimously. I will share the procedural path >> towards the ICANN Board vote with you in the next days. >> Many thanks again for all your hard work and very best wishes, >> Lars >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5041 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pitinan at etda.or.th Sat Jun 27 12:03:01 2015 From: pitinan at etda.or.th (Pitinan Kooarmornpatana) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:03:01 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report In-Reply-To: References: <4C789ACE-90C0-4888-9FDC-6DA6D1252E55@winklerpartners.com> Message-ID: <0b85c2b4e3f849fda23a568f53308387@dcsvitpmx01.etda.or.th> Dear all, Thank you so much for the excellent working group. I?ve been a good experience working with you all. Regards, Pitinan From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 10:11 PM To: Peter J. Dernbach; Dillon, Chris Cc: Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Thanks so much Peter! It's been a pleasure to work with you, Chris, Rudi and all the other PDP WG members! Cheers, Julie From: "Peter J. Dernbach" > Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 10:38 PM To: "Dillon, Chris" > Cc: Lars Hoffmann >, "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Thanks to you all, particularly our excellent co-chairs Chris and Rudi and the great support from ICANN staff Julie, Lars, Nathalie and all. Cheers, Peter "Dillon, Chris" > ? 2015/6/25 ??4:45 ??? Dear all, Many thanks to all of you - WG members and staff who worked on this over the months. You may also find today?s results at: https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/ With all best wishes, Chris. == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: > on behalf of Lars Hoffmann > Date: Wednesday, 24 June 2015 17:30 To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Dear all, This is to inform you that the GNSO Council has passed the Final Report of the T&T PDP Working Group unanimously. I will share the procedural path towards the ICANN Board vote with you in the next days. Many thanks again for all your hard work and very best wishes, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Mon Jun 29 14:21:46 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:21:46 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report In-Reply-To: <0b85c2b4e3f849fda23a568f53308387@dcsvitpmx01.etda.or.th> References: <4C789ACE-90C0-4888-9FDC-6DA6D1252E55@winklerpartners.com> <0b85c2b4e3f849fda23a568f53308387@dcsvitpmx01.etda.or.th> Message-ID: Dear Peter, Pitinan and other T&T colleagues, Thank you very much for your good wishes. We all enjoyed working together on this one and I?m sure we?ll be brought together on other bits of ICANN work in the future. In fact there is some talk of an Implementation Review Team for this PDP and of members being encouraged to join it, so it may be sooner than one thinks. I?ll be in touch when I have further information, anyway. With all best wishes, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana [mailto:pitinan at etda.or.th] Sent: 27 June 2015 13:03 To: Julie Hedlund; Peter J. Dernbach; Dillon, Chris Cc: Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Dear all, Thank you so much for the excellent working group. I?ve been a good experience working with you all. Regards, Pitinan From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 10:11 PM To: Peter J. Dernbach; Dillon, Chris Cc: Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Thanks so much Peter! It's been a pleasure to work with you, Chris, Rudi and all the other PDP WG members! Cheers, Julie From: "Peter J. Dernbach" > Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 10:38 PM To: "Dillon, Chris" > Cc: Lars Hoffmann >, "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Thanks to you all, particularly our excellent co-chairs Chris and Rudi and the great support from ICANN staff Julie, Lars, Nathalie and all. Cheers, Peter "Dillon, Chris" > ? 2015/6/25 ??4:45 ??? Dear all, Many thanks to all of you - WG members and staff who worked on this over the months. You may also find today?s results at: https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/ With all best wishes, Chris. == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: > on behalf of Lars Hoffmann > Date: Wednesday, 24 June 2015 17:30 To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Dear all, This is to inform you that the GNSO Council has passed the Final Report of the T&T PDP Working Group unanimously. I will share the procedural path towards the ICANN Board vote with you in the next days. Many thanks again for all your hard work and very best wishes, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wanawit at etda.or.th Tue Jun 30 07:08:51 2015 From: wanawit at etda.or.th (Wanawit Ahkuputra) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 07:08:51 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report In-Reply-To: References: <4C789ACE-90C0-4888-9FDC-6DA6D1252E55@winklerpartners.com> <0b85c2b4e3f849fda23a568f53308387@dcsvitpmx01.etda.or.th> Message-ID: Dear Chris, We were grateful to the work of T&T Team. ETDA would establish the linguistic expert working group comprise of all multi stake holder here in Thailand to working on the issue on T&T for the name and address issue. The propose of this working group would be assist in ISO-3166 , UNGEGN, UN/LOCDE under UN/CEFACT , UPU and WHOIS in the future. If possible we could invite you to have the conference here in the future on this matter. I do believe that would create the awareness of the work around that country could prepare to facilitate and assist the requirement that would come in the future. We try to update with you regarding this progress. And without early engagement in the T&T PDP process we would not have a chance to prepare for this for community. Thanks again and do hope we keep the ball rolling. Best Regards, Wanawit Ahkuputra Sent from my iPad On Jun 29, 2558 BE, at 21:24, Dillon, Chris > wrote: Dear Peter, Pitinan and other T&T colleagues, Thank you very much for your good wishes. We all enjoyed working together on this one and I?m sure we?ll be brought together on other bits of ICANN work in the future. In fact there is some talk of an Implementation Review Team for this PDP and of members being encouraged to join it, so it may be sooner than one thinks. I?ll be in touch when I have further information, anyway. With all best wishes, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana [mailto:pitinan at etda.or.th] Sent: 27 June 2015 13:03 To: Julie Hedlund; Peter J. Dernbach; Dillon, Chris Cc: Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Dear all, Thank you so much for the excellent working group. I?ve been a good experience working with you all. Regards, Pitinan From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 10:11 PM To: Peter J. Dernbach; Dillon, Chris Cc: Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Thanks so much Peter! It's been a pleasure to work with you, Chris, Rudi and all the other PDP WG members! Cheers, Julie From: "Peter J. Dernbach" > Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 10:38 PM To: "Dillon, Chris" > Cc: Lars Hoffmann >, "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Thanks to you all, particularly our excellent co-chairs Chris and Rudi and the great support from ICANN staff Julie, Lars, Nathalie and all. Cheers, Peter "Dillon, Chris" > ? 2015/6/25 ??4:45 ??? Dear all, Many thanks to all of you ? WG members and staff who worked on this over the months. You may also find today?s results at: https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/ With all best wishes, Chris. == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: > on behalf of Lars Hoffmann > Date: Wednesday, 24 June 2015 17:30 To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Dear all, This is to inform you that the GNSO Council has passed the Final Report of the T&T PDP Working Group unanimously. I will share the procedural path towards the ICANN Board vote with you in the next days. Many thanks again for all your hard work and very best wishes, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu Tue Jun 30 08:20:42 2015 From: petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu (Petter Rindforth) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 08:20:42 GMT Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] It has been nice to work with you all... Message-ID: <1435652442600.21204.6148@webmail6> ...and a special thanks to our two Co-chairs. I have learned a lot from you way to work together, something I have used in my other WG. Again: congratulations! Best,Petter --? Petter Rindforth, LL M Fenix Legal KB Stureplan 4c, 4tr 114 35 Stockholm Sweden Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 E-mail: petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu www.fenixlegal.eu NOTICE This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail. Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu Thank you -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Congratulations.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 1961683 bytes Desc: not available URL: From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Tue Jun 30 09:17:24 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:17:24 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report In-Reply-To: References: <4C789ACE-90C0-4888-9FDC-6DA6D1252E55@winklerpartners.com> <0b85c2b4e3f849fda23a568f53308387@dcsvitpmx01.etda.or.th> Message-ID: Dear Wanawit, I?m sure I speak for the whole WG when I say I wish you well in this endeavour. I am really glad that T&T has been of help. Many of us are keen to build on the work. Ever since my part time job year ago teaching the monks English at a Thai monastery (in Wimbledon!, near the tennis courts) I have wanted to visit Thailand and so I would not need much persuasion to come to a conference. With all best wishes, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: Wanawit Ahkuputra [mailto:wanawit at etda.or.th] Sent: 30 June 2015 08:09 To: Dillon, Chris Cc: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana; Peter J. Dernbach; Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org; Julie Hedlund Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Dear Chris, We were grateful to the work of T&T Team. ETDA would establish the linguistic expert working group comprise of all multi stake holder here in Thailand to working on the issue on T&T for the name and address issue. The propose of this working group would be assist in ISO-3166 , UNGEGN, UN/LOCDE under UN/CEFACT , UPU and WHOIS in the future. If possible we could invite you to have the conference here in the future on this matter. I do believe that would create the awareness of the work around that country could prepare to facilitate and assist the requirement that would come in the future. We try to update with you regarding this progress. And without early engagement in the T&T PDP process we would not have a chance to prepare for this for community. Thanks again and do hope we keep the ball rolling. Best Regards, Wanawit Ahkuputra Sent from my iPad On Jun 29, 2558 BE, at 21:24, Dillon, Chris > wrote: Dear Peter, Pitinan and other T&T colleagues, Thank you very much for your good wishes. We all enjoyed working together on this one and I?m sure we?ll be brought together on other bits of ICANN work in the future. In fact there is some talk of an Implementation Review Team for this PDP and of members being encouraged to join it, so it may be sooner than one thinks. I?ll be in touch when I have further information, anyway. With all best wishes, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana [mailto:pitinan at etda.or.th] Sent: 27 June 2015 13:03 To: Julie Hedlund; Peter J. Dernbach; Dillon, Chris Cc: Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Dear all, Thank you so much for the excellent working group. I?ve been a good experience working with you all. Regards, Pitinan From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 10:11 PM To: Peter J. Dernbach; Dillon, Chris Cc: Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Thanks so much Peter! It's been a pleasure to work with you, Chris, Rudi and all the other PDP WG members! Cheers, Julie From: "Peter J. Dernbach" > Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 10:38 PM To: "Dillon, Chris" > Cc: Lars Hoffmann >, "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Thanks to you all, particularly our excellent co-chairs Chris and Rudi and the great support from ICANN staff Julie, Lars, Nathalie and all. Cheers, Peter "Dillon, Chris" > ? 2015/6/25 ??4:45 ??? Dear all, Many thanks to all of you ? WG members and staff who worked on this over the months. You may also find today?s results at: https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/ With all best wishes, Chris. == Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: > on behalf of Lars Hoffmann > Date: Wednesday, 24 June 2015 17:30 To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Dear all, This is to inform you that the GNSO Council has passed the Final Report of the T&T PDP Working Group unanimously. I will share the procedural path towards the ICANN Board vote with you in the next days. Many thanks again for all your hard work and very best wishes, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Tue Jun 30 09:24:19 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:24:19 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] It has been nice to work with you all... In-Reply-To: <1435652442600.21204.6148@webmail6> References: <1435652442600.21204.6148@webmail6> Message-ID: Dear Petter, Thank you for your kind email. I think T&T is a good example of the multistakeholder model working well. I would certainly also recommend co-chairs with complementary expertise at least in situations where one person can't cover the whole range of expertise required. Many thanks for the photo! Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of Petter Rindforth Sent: 30 June 2015 09:21 To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] It has been nice to work with you all... ...and a special thanks to our two Co-chairs. I have learned a lot from you way to work together, something I have used in my other WG. Again: congratulations! Best, Petter -- Petter Rindforth, LL M Fenix Legal KB Stureplan 4c, 4tr 114 35 Stockholm Sweden Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 E-mail: petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu www.fenixlegal.eu NOTICE This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail. Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu Thank you -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From aelsadr at egyptig.org Tue Jun 30 09:48:18 2015 From: aelsadr at egyptig.org (Amr Elsadr) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:48:18 +0200 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report In-Reply-To: References: <4C789ACE-90C0-4888-9FDC-6DA6D1252E55@winklerpartners.com> <0b85c2b4e3f849fda23a568f53308387@dcsvitpmx01.etda.or.th> Message-ID: <914C742D-AA70-413D-8A5B-99B5A0720D3A@egyptig.org> Hi, Thanks to everyone for all the hard work, and particularly Chris and Rudi for leading this work throughout both the charter drafting phase as well as the working group. I sincerely hope our work will contribute to making end-to-end internationalised domain name registration services a reality. As always?, a great thanks to both the GNSO secretariat and policy staff teams for the awesome support they have provided us throughout this endeavour. Couldn?t have done it without you. On another note, regarding the implementation review team (IRT); The working group recommendations are published for yet another public comment period in preparation for the ICANN board to adopt them (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/transliteration-contact-recommendations-2015-06-29-en). Should the board adopt the recommendations following the public comment period, the GNSO Council should at that point in accordance with its own adopted motion form an IRT to work with ICANN staff to implement the recommendations. I look forward to that happening over the next few months. Thanks again to all. Amr On Jun 29, 2015, at 4:21 PM, Dillon, Chris wrote: > Dear Peter, Pitinan and other T&T colleagues, > > Thank you very much for your good wishes. > > We all enjoyed working together on this one and I?m sure we?ll be brought together on other bits of ICANN work in the future. In fact there is some talk of an Implementation Review Team for this PDP and of members being encouraged to join it, so it may be sooner than one thinks. I?ll be in touch when I have further information, anyway. > > With all best wishes, > > Chris. > -- > Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599)www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon > > From: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana [mailto:pitinan at etda.or.th] > Sent: 27 June 2015 13:03 > To: Julie Hedlund; Peter J. Dernbach; Dillon, Chris > Cc: Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org > Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report > > Dear all, > > Thank you so much for the excellent working group. > I?ve been a good experience working with you all. > > Regards, > Pitinan > > From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund > Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 10:11 PM > To: Peter J. Dernbach; Dillon, Chris > Cc: Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org > Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report > > Thanks so much Peter! It's been a pleasure to work with you, Chris, Rudi and all the other PDP WG members! > > Cheers, > Julie > > From: "Peter J. Dernbach" > Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 10:38 PM > To: "Dillon, Chris" > Cc: Lars Hoffmann , "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report > > Thanks to you all, particularly our excellent co-chairs Chris and Rudi and the great support from ICANN staff Julie, Lars, Nathalie and all. > > Cheers, > Peter > > "Dillon, Chris" ? 2015/6/25 ??4:45 ??? > > Dear all, > > Many thanks to all of you ? WG members and staff who worked on this over the months. > > You may also find today?s results at: > https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/ > With all best wishes, > Chris. > == > Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599)ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon > From: on behalf of Lars Hoffmann > Date: Wednesday, 24 June 2015 17:30 > To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report > > Dear all, > This is to inform you that the GNSO Council has passed the Final Report of the T&T PDP Working Group unanimously. I will share the procedural path towards the ICANN Board vote with you in the next days. > Many thanks again for all your hard work and very best wishes, > Lars From c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk Tue Jun 30 09:53:04 2015 From: c.dillon at ucl.ac.uk (Dillon, Chris) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:53:04 +0000 Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report In-Reply-To: <914C742D-AA70-413D-8A5B-99B5A0720D3A@egyptig.org> References: <4C789ACE-90C0-4888-9FDC-6DA6D1252E55@winklerpartners.com> <0b85c2b4e3f849fda23a568f53308387@dcsvitpmx01.etda.or.th> <914C742D-AA70-413D-8A5B-99B5A0720D3A@egyptig.org> Message-ID: Dear Amr, Thank you for your good wishes, your contributions to the group and your presentation of the motion to the Council. Also for outlining below the map of where it's all going now. We're certainly grateful to Lars, Julie, Mary, Marika, Glen and Nathalie. I fear I'm missing people out. With all best wishes, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr Sent: 30 June 2015 10:48 To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report Hi, Thanks to everyone for all the hard work, and particularly Chris and Rudi for leading this work throughout both the charter drafting phase as well as the working group. I sincerely hope our work will contribute to making end-to-end internationalised domain name registration services a reality. As always?, a great thanks to both the GNSO secretariat and policy staff teams for the awesome support they have provided us throughout this endeavour. Couldn?t have done it without you. On another note, regarding the implementation review team (IRT); The working group recommendations are published for yet another public comment period in preparation for the ICANN board to adopt them (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/transliteration-contact-recommendations-2015-06-29-en). Should the board adopt the recommendations following the public comment period, the GNSO Council should at that point in accordance with its own adopted motion form an IRT to work with ICANN staff to implement the recommendations. I look forward to that happening over the next few months. Thanks again to all. Amr On Jun 29, 2015, at 4:21 PM, Dillon, Chris wrote: > Dear Peter, Pitinan and other T&T colleagues, > > Thank you very much for your good wishes. > > We all enjoyed working together on this one and I?m sure we?ll be brought together on other bits of ICANN work in the future. In fact there is some talk of an Implementation Review Team for this PDP and of members being encouraged to join it, so it may be sooner than one thinks. I?ll be in touch when I have further information, anyway. > > With all best wishes, > > Chris. > -- > Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital > Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int > 31599)www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon > > From: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana [mailto:pitinan at etda.or.th] > Sent: 27 June 2015 13:03 > To: Julie Hedlund; Peter J. Dernbach; Dillon, Chris > Cc: Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org > Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final > Report > > Dear all, > > Thank you so much for the excellent working group. > I?ve been a good experience working with you all. > > Regards, > Pitinan > > From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org > [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie > Hedlund > Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 10:11 PM > To: Peter J. Dernbach; Dillon, Chris > Cc: Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org > Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final > Report > > Thanks so much Peter! It's been a pleasure to work with you, Chris, Rudi and all the other PDP WG members! > > Cheers, > Julie > > From: "Peter J. Dernbach" > Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 10:38 PM > To: "Dillon, Chris" > Cc: Lars Hoffmann , > "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > > Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final > Report > > Thanks to you all, particularly our excellent co-chairs Chris and Rudi and the great support from ICANN staff Julie, Lars, Nathalie and all. > > Cheers, > Peter > > "Dillon, Chris" ? 2015/6/25 ??4:45 ??? > > Dear all, > > Many thanks to all of you ? WG members and staff who worked on this over the months. > > You may also find today?s results at: > https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/ > With all best wishes, > Chris. > == > Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital > Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int > 31599)ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon > From: on behalf of Lars > Hoffmann > Date: Wednesday, 24 June 2015 17:30 > To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg at icann.org" > > Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] GNSO Council passes Final Report > > Dear all, > This is to inform you that the GNSO Council has passed the Final Report of the T&T PDP Working Group unanimously. I will share the procedural path towards the ICANN Board vote with you in the next days. > Many thanks again for all your hard work and very best wishes, Lars