[Gnso-dmpm-wg] GNSO Council Resolutions 8 May 2014

[Glen de Saint Géry]

FYI
Dear Councillors,

Ahead of the Council minutes, please find the resolutions passed by the Council at its meeting on Thursday, 8 May 2014.

Consent agenda:
The Council confirmed the new Chair and Co-Chairs for the Data and Metrics for Policy Making non-PDP working group,
namely Jonathan Zuck (IPC) as Chair as well as Rudy Vansnick (NPOC), Olevie Kouami (NPOC) and Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(At-Large) as Co-Chairs.
Confirmation of Avri Doria as member of the GAC / GNSO Consultation Group and replacement for Mikey O’Conner.

Motion in response to the NGPC's letter with respect to Specification 13

WHEREAS,

1.  the NGPC has adopted a proposed Specification 13 to the Registry Agreement to reflect
requests by .BRAND TLDs whilst delaying the implementation of an additional clause contained
therein, which will allow a Registry Operator to designate up to three exclusive Registrars;

2.  the NGPC has sent a letter to the GNSO Council Chair asking for advice as to whether
the GNSO Council believes that this additional clause is inconsistent with the letter and
intent of GNSO Policy Recommendation 19 on the Introduction of New Generic Top-level Domains;

3. the GNSO Council thanks the NGPC for referring the matter back to the GNSO Council;

4. the GNSO Council has discussed the matter including with the Brand Registry Group
(BRG) and considered the background information provided by the BRG;

5. the GNSO Council has reached out to participants in the Policy Development Process
at the time of developing the policy and the associated Board Report on the Introduction
of New Generic Top-Level Domains (11 September 2007);

6.  the Council acknowledges and understands the proposal made by .BRAND TLD
operators;

It is now RESOLVED:

1.  that the right to only use up to three exclusive registrars, as contained in Specification
 13 is inconsistent with Recommendation 19 as (i) the language of this recommendation of
the final report of the GNSO does not stipulate any exceptions from the requirements to
treat registrars in a non-discriminatory fashion and (ii) the GNSO new gTLDs Committee
discussed potential exceptions at the time, but did not include them in its recommendations,
which is why the lack of an exception cannot be seen as an unintended omission, but a
deliberate policy statement;

2.  that the Council, notwithstanding resolved 1,does not object to the implementation of
Specification 13 as a whole, including an additional clause which will allow a Registry
Operator to designate up to three exclusive Registrars, given the specific circumstances
and the fact that a public comment period on Specification 13 was conducted in 2013
without objections from the GNSO, save for that from certain registrars, which was
subsequently withdrawn;

3. that the Council reserves the right to initiate a policy development process, potentially
resulting in Consensus Policy affecting both existing and future TLDs, if and when the
right granted to .BRAND TLDs is at risk of, or bears the risk of, being used for augmenting
and / or circumventing the conditions of Specification 13 or any subsequent provisions;

4. that the Council's acceptance of a variation from original policy recommendation
may not be taken as a precedent for any future decisions.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Kind regards,

Glen



Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>
http://gnso.icann.org


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-dmpm-wg/attachments/20140508/b7d35aca/attachment.html>