[Gnso-dmpm-wg] [Dmpm] Re: Metrics Request Pilot - DMPM Rec#1

[Pam Little]

With regard to Janvier’s suggestion, maybe we can be more specific. For example:

 

·       Availability and clarity of eligibility criteria for funding

·       # of applications received vs # approved or rejected

·       Average time of the approval process

 

With regard to Tony’ suggestion, maybe we can add:

 

·       Who (eg registrants or registrars) or what groups have benefited from the availability of data/metrics?

 

From: Janvier Noulaye [mailto:jnoulaye at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:36 AM
To: Tony Onorato
Cc: Berry Cobb; dmpm at icann.kavi.com; gnso-dmpm-wg at icann.org
Subject: [Dmpm] Re: Metrics Request Pilot - DMPM Rec#1

 

Added to the view of  Tony, I would say that, this set of “measure of success” should also show out both the WG satisfaction and the Community satisfaction.

 

/Janvier Ngnoulaye

 

2015-07-22 20:55 GMT+01:00 Tony Onorato <tony.onorato at fisherbroyles.com>:

Berry – 

 

My sense is to measure success based on two binary questions:  (1) did the WG use data and/or metrics as part of its process (e.g., in scoping/defining the issue, prioritizing the issues under consideration, and/or guiding the WG to an informed recommendation on the issue under consideration), and (2) [was the incorporation of data and/or metrics] [or] [were the data/metrics] useful to the WG in its process?

 

Best,

 

Tony

 

Tony Onorato, Esq./CIPP(US)

FisherBroyles, LLP

Directs: 202.459.3599/646.397.4750 | Fax: 516.706.9809 |  <mailto:tony.onorato at fisherbroyles.com> tony.onorato at fisherbroyles.com |  <http://www.fsblegal.com/> fisherbroyles.com

 

From: Berry Cobb [mailto:mail at berrycobb.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:33 PM
To: dmpm at icann.kavi.com; gnso-dmpm-wg at icann.org
Subject: [Dmpm] Metrics Request Pilot - DMPM Rec#1

 

All,

 

In making updates to the next version of our draft initial report, I reminded myself that we also need to include under the recommendation details some set of “measure of success.”  I think it will benefit to provide at least a simple idea of success for the community to respond to.  Else, I suspect that if comments are not submitted to that regard, it will be asked by the GNSO Council.

 

Please provide input on the list, and I can add the groups ideas to the draft.  I will include a placeholder in the document.

 

Thank you.

 

B

 

 

Berry Cobb

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)

720.839.5735

mail at berrycobb.com

@berrycobb

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-dmpm-wg/attachments/20150723/9e79521d/attachment-0002.html>