[Gnso-dmpm-wg] - Data Request IRTP Use Case

[Berry Cobb]

Hi Theo,

Thank you for the input.  I might ask that you provide your input into to
the RFI document that was sent.  Comments in the doc will suffice.  I'm not
sure if you read the transcript or the MP3 from our last call, but if the
group chooses to advance this RFI, one the WG polishes the document further,
our next step is to send this over to the IRTP-D mailing list for input
prior to us sending it out to the broader GNSO for their input.

If you will recall, this is only a "Use Case" and not an actual request
although someday it could become real.  The closer we can make it real, the
better off we will be.

As also mentioned on the call, this use case will likely not be instrumental
to the groups possible recommendations, but it could perhaps uncover a few
things we might have missed.

Again thanks for the feedback.

B


Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
mail at berrycobb.com
@berrycobb


-----Original Message-----
From: gnso-dmpm-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-dmpm-wg-bounces at icann.org]
On Behalf Of gtheo
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 06:40
To: Steve Chan
Cc: gnso-dmpm-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-dmpm-wg] - Data Request IRTP Use Case

Thank you Steve and group for this use case.

Few quick comments.

I have the feeling that the RFI assumes that Registrars have a transfer
process in place that is identical for every Registrar.
The request itself at the Registry level is identical, the procedure however
before the transfer is requested at the Registry level is different for
Registrars and can fail at many levels depending on the procedure being
used.

The RFI does not make a difference between Registrar business models. 
The numbers when it comes to support will vary wildly with Registrars who
only deal with resellers compared to Registrars who deal with end
users/registrants.


Best regards,

Theo Geurts

Realtime Register B.V.

Ceintuurbaan 32A
8024 AA - ZWOLLE - The Netherlands

T: +31.384530759
F: +31.384524734
U: www.realtimeregister.com
E: support at realtimeregister.com




Steve Chan schreef op 2015-02-26 02:14:
> Dear WG Members,
> 
> Per the working group call held on Tuesday 24 February 2015, staff is 
> re-circulating the IRTP use case/executive summary document for the 
> group to consider whether it would like to pursue this effort. If 
> there is interest in circulating this use case to interested parties 
> (e.g., to registrars, registries, IRTP Part D WG, etc.), staff feels 
> that it is critical that the WG review and refine the use case. As was 
> discussed on the call, while the use case may not be critical to 
> developing the recommendations, it does provide some benefits, chief 
> amongst those is providing real world testing and refinement of the 
> data request template. Please discuss on list the direction the group 
> would like to take for the use case exercise.
> 
> Best,
> 
> STEVEN CHAN
> Sr. Policy Manager
> 
> ICANN
> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
> 
> Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
> steve.chan at icann.org
> 
> direct: +1.310.301.3886
> mobile: +1.310.339.4410
> 
> tel: +1.310.301.5800
> 
> fax: +1.310.823.8649
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-dmpm-wg mailing list
> Gnso-dmpm-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-dmpm-wg

_______________________________________________
Gnso-dmpm-wg mailing list
Gnso-dmpm-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-dmpm-wg