<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Arial Black";
panose-1:2 11 10 4 2 1 2 2 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Hi Andrew,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Thank you for the response. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>As for your first point, you are correct in that this use case request relies more on Registrars. However, it does include a hint of data from Registries, albeit data this is contractually required to be sent to ICANN on a monthly basis and ultimately publicly available. While the WG is focusing on the IRTP use case because it is the most tangible “real world” example, the WG should also still consider the other draft use cases such as the third one where perhaps the “Subsequent Round WG” or PDPs that may flow out of its efforts might be more Registry specific. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>In terms of your second point, I think the same principles may apply where some data requested may not be a contractual obligation and if Registries were to accept such a request, a determination in how it might be paid for and subsequently aggregated would be similar to Registrar concerns.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>If the WG does consider distributing the IRTP use case across the SGs/Cs, I think the input we receive will better inform our other use cases as well.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>I hope this helps. B<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Berry A. Cobb<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>720.839.5735<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><a href="mailto:mail@berrycobb.com"><span style='color:blue'>mail@berrycobb.com</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>@berrycobb<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> gnso-dmpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-dmpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Andrew Merriam<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, November 12, 2014 15:13<br><b>To:</b> Steve Chan<br><b>Cc:</b> gnso-dmpm-wg@icann.org<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Gnso-dmpm-wg] - IRTP Review Use Case With Executive Summary<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>Thanks, Steve. I just want to note that the IRTP example relies heavily on registrar reporting. Not being a registrar, I don't know how much of this information is actually currently tracked or will be tracked under the new IRTP. That would be helpful context and I'd certainly look to those closer to the registrar end of things to provide an assessment what fulfillment of such a request would entail. <o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>As far as Registry concerns, we outsource most of our technical and database requirements, as most new TLD registries do. I am not aware that our use of any reporting function comes at a higher cost but that could be a concern for some folks. I don't think there is anything to be done with this on either side but am merely brainstorming how fulfillment of such a request would work..<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Thanks<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>A<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Steve Chan <<a href="mailto:steve.chan@icann.org" target="_blank">steve.chan@icann.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black'>Dear WG Members,<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black'>Staff has prepared a draft executive summary that has been attached to the IRTP use case discussed in last week’s call. As a reminder, the WG will be meeting next week on 18 November at 21:00 UTC and I would like to strongly urge discussion on the email list regarding this draft in advance of that meeting to ensure that progress is made. <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black'>In addition, as the scope of data/metrics requests for policy making extends beyond just the registries and registrars (including this IRTP Review use case), the WG may want to consider distributing this use case more broadly, perhaps to all stakeholder groups and constituencies. I would encourage discussion on this point as well.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black'>Best,<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>Steven Chan</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'><br>Sr. Policy Manager<br><br><b>ICANN<br></b>12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300</span><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536<br><a href="mailto:steve.chan@icann.org" target="_blank" title="blocked::mailto:karen.lettner@icann.org">steve.chan@icann.org<br></a><br>direct: <a href="tel:%2B1.310.301.3886" target="_blank">+1.310.301.3886</a><br>mobile: <a href="tel:%2B1.310.339.4410" target="_blank">+1.310.339.4410</a></span><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>tel: <a href="tel:%2B1.310.301.5800" target="_blank">+1.310.301.5800</a></span><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>fax: <a href="tel:%2B1.310.823.8649" target="_blank">+1.310.823.8649</a></span><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><br>_______________________________________________<br>Gnso-dmpm-wg mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Gnso-dmpm-wg@icann.org">Gnso-dmpm-wg@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-dmpm-wg" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-dmpm-wg</a><o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><br><br clear=all><o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal>-- <o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial Black","sans-serif"'>Andrew Merriam</span><o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>Business Development Coordinator<o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Top Level Design, LLC<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><a href="http://tldesign.co" target="_blank">tldesign.co</a><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>505.238.9166<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>@AndMerriam<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>skype: andrewpmerriam<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></body></html>