<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style=""><font size="4">Added to the view of Tony, I would say that, this set of “measure of success” should also show out both the WG satisfaction and the Community satisfaction.</font><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style=""><font size="4"><br></font></div><div class="gmail_default" style=""><font size="4">/Janvier Ngnoulaye</font></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-07-22 20:55 GMT+01:00 Tony Onorato <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tony.onorato@fisherbroyles.com" target="_blank">tony.onorato@fisherbroyles.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="14eb7561c66b35a1__MailEndCompose"><span style="color:#1f497d">Berry –
<u></u><u></u></span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d">My sense is to measure success based on two binary questions: (1) did the WG use data and/or metrics as part of its process (e.g., in scoping/defining the issue, prioritizing the issues under consideration,
and/or guiding the WG to an informed recommendation on the issue under consideration), and (2) [was the incorporation of data and/or metrics] [or] [were the data/metrics] useful to the WG in its process?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d">Best,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d">Tony<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:1.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;color:black">Tony Onorato, Esq./CIPP(US)<u></u><u></u></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:2.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;color:black">FisherBroyles, LLP<u></u><u></u></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:2.0pt"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;color:black">Directs: 202.459.3599/646.397.4750</span><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;color:#0065a2">
</span></b><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;color:#0070c0">|</span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;color:blue">
</span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;color:#1f497d">Fax: 516.706.9809</span><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;color:#0065a2">
</span></b><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;color:#0070c0">|</span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;color:blue">
</span><a href="mailto:tony.onorato@fisherbroyles.com" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:9.0pt">tony.onorato@fisherbroyles.com</span></a><span style="font-size:9.0pt;color:blue">
</span><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;color:#0070c0">| </span></b><a href="http://www.fsblegal.com/" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:9.0pt">fisherbroyles.com</span></a><span style="font-size:9.0pt;color:#44546a"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #e1e1e1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Berry Cobb [mailto:<a href="mailto:mail@berrycobb.com" target="_blank">mail@berrycobb.com</a>] <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:33 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:dmpm@icann.kavi.com" target="_blank">dmpm@icann.kavi.com</a>; <a href="mailto:gnso-dmpm-wg@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-dmpm-wg@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Dmpm] Metrics Request Pilot - DMPM Rec#1<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div><div><div class="h5">
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">All,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In making updates to the next version of our draft initial report, I reminded myself that we also need to include under the recommendation details some set of “measure of success.” I think it will benefit to provide at least a simple idea
of success for the community to respond to. Else, I suspect that if comments are not submitted to that regard, it will be asked by the GNSO Council.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Please provide input on the list, and I can add the groups ideas to the draft. I will include a placeholder in the document.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thank you.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">B<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d">Berry Cobb<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d">Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d">720.839.5735<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d"><a href="mailto:mail@berrycobb.com" target="_blank">mail@berrycobb.com</a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d">@berrycobb<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div></div></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>