<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Dear Legal Committee,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Apologies for the double email.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Please find the slightly adjusted version from Melina below:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">Would you change or add anything else on your analysis under points 1, 2 and 3 if an additional step is introduced after distinguishing between natural and legal persons, as described in the
2-step approach below? In particular, could you please assess the level of risk (if any) of such approach:</span></i><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">a. Step one, allow self-identification of registrant as either natural and legal person. If natural, then full redaction of data remains in place, if legal go to step 2.</span></i><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:black">b. Step 2, Further distinguishing between data of legal persons which contain personal information and data which contain non-personal information. Publish only non-personal information.</span></i><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Please advise on potential further steps that could be taken on how to safely implement such an approach to minimize liability for wrongful disclosure (if different than the steps described above).</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Please review the edits from the above version and reply via the mailing list by
<b><u>COB Friday, 19 March</u></b> if you have any proposed edits or concerns.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Best regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Berry, Marika, and Caitlin</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:black">From: </span></b><span style="color:black">Gnso-epdp-legal <gnso-epdp-legal-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Caitlin Tubergen via Gnso-epdp-legal <gnso-epdp-legal@icann.org><br>
<b>Reply-To: </b>Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen@icann.org><br>
<b>Date: </b>Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 9:05 AM<br>
<b>To: </b>"gnso-epdp-legal@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-legal@icann.org><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[Gnso-epdp-legal] Updated legal v. natural questions (Melina)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Dear Legal Committee,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Thank you to Laureen for working with Melina to edit the highlighted questions in the attached document; as a reminder, the other questions in this document have already been submitted to Bird & Bird – please
only review the highlighted questions. We have provided the questions below for ease of reference:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt">4. Would you change or add anything else on your analysis under points 1, 2 and 3 if an additional step is introduced after distinguishing between natural and legal persons, as described in the 2-step
approach below? In particular, could you please assess the level of risk (if any) of such approach:</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt">a. Step one, allow self-identification of registrant as either natural and legal person. If natural, then full redaction of data remains in place, if legal go to step 2.</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt">b. Enable registrant to further confirm that its provided data contains only non-personal information. </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt">c. Step 2, Further distinguishing between data of legal persons which contain personal information and data which contain non-personal information. Publish only non-personal information.
</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Please advise on potential further steps that could be taken on how to safely implement such an approach to minimize liability for wrongful disclosure (if different than the steps described above).</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Please review Laureen and Melina’s edits and reply via the mailing list by
<b><u>COB Friday, 19 March</u></b> if you have any proposed edits or concerns.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Best regards,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Berry, Caitlin, and Marika</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>