[Gnso-epdp-team] Next face-to-face meeting

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Kurt
Dear All
Thank you very much for the message.
I have missed the first F2f MEETING DUE TO ITS LOCATION.and I do not want I
miss the next f2f meeting. This serious and shall be taken into account
I therefore oppose to be held in any country which has general ban on the
nationals of other countries
Europe would be one suggestion  or
Canada another suggestion
Moreover, I have a fir commitment from 05 JAN to 14Jan.IN BUSAN kOREA
Consequently I can manage second week of December
Regards
Kavouss

On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 10:18 AM Chris Disspain <
chris.disspain at board.icann.org> wrote:

> Kurt,
>
> There is a face to face of the RDS Review Team in Brussels Dec 10, 11, 12.
> That involves a number of EPDP members.
>
> There is a board retreat in LA in January 24 through 27.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris
>
> On 26 Oct 2018, at 08:48, Kurt Pritz <kurt at kjpritz.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone:
>
> Thank you again for your time, effort and thought during the ICANN
> meeting. While others were visiting the various great sites that Barcelona
> has to offer, we were all not visiting the various great sites that
> Barcelona has to offer.
>
> Yesterday, I met with Nick Tomasso who heads the ICANN meetings team to
> develop some options for the next face-to-face meeting. At various times
> during the past week, many of you approached me with the following points:
>
>    - Our results are significantly better in a face-to-face format
>    - The proverbial clock is ticking
>    - We should strive to maintain the momentum we have, therefore
>    - We should hold our next meeting as soon as possible.
>
>
> With that in mind, Nick said he could support the following two options, a
> meeting
>
>    - In the first or second week in December
>    - In the second or third week of January
>
>
> [Meetings less than 90 days away require Göran’s approval, but Nick
> believes he can obtain this. Nick is checking on venues with which he is
> familiar in Brussels now, although the meeting location is not certain.]
>
> I am of two minds on this but do have an opinion and would appreciate your
> feedback over the next few days so that I can get back to Nick the first of
> next week.
>
> 1) The January meeting is more or less timed for us to take into account
> the first round of public comment.
>
> 2) Te December meeting allows us to keep working after the initial report
> is issued (or to wrap up the initial report in the worse case).
>
> I think the December meeting is the better option for us. We are not going
> to stand down after the initial report is issued. There is a lot of work to
> be done. It is better, I think, to meet and consider unsettled issues,
> rather than meet to discuss the effect of public comment. If we are serious
> about finishing on time, I don’t think we can stop. So despite the
> inconvenience (and it will be very inconvenient for me), I think we should
> meet sooner rather than later.
>
> Of course, this all depends on the ICANN meetings team pulling this off,
> which is no small feat,
>
> Let me know your thoughts, I will write to Nick on Tuesday.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Kurt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20181026/4a3d0f51/attachment-0001.html>