[Gnso-epdp-team] Section 4.4.8

[Arasteh]

Dear All
I agree almost with what Hadia said
Kavouss 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 13 Sep 2018, at 10:45, Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi <Hadia at tra.gov.eg> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
>  
> Dear Alex and Amr,
>  
> First off thank you  for your effort and time on this proposal. But are you saying that among the purposes of the processing of the data is the "  identification of third-parties with legitimate interests". This is surely not one of the purposes for the processing of the data therefore a suggest removing it.
>  
> So my suggestion would be.
>  
> 4.4.8  Supporting a Model that provides access to parties with legitimate interests grounded in legal bases to Registration Data relevant to addressing specific issues involving domain name registrations; such as issues related to consumer protection, investigation of cybercrime, DNS abuse and intellectual property protection.
>  
> I put model as I think it is more specific but I am fine with using the term framework if you see it more appropriate. I also suggest adding  "such as issues related to"  which would serve to provide examples of third parties with legitimate interest.
>  
> Kind Regards
> Hadia
>  
>  
>  
> From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Alex Deacon
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 10:34 PM
> To: gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] Section 4.4.8
>  
> Hi All,
>  
> As you know a group of us has been working to recommend an update to Section 4.4.8 of the temp spec.  
>  
> While we haven't come to full agreement on the update, we are pretty close and wanted to share the current/tentative output of the volunteer team with the broader team. 
>  
> 4.4.8  Supporting a framework that enables identification of third-parties with legitimate interests grounded in legal bases, and providing these third-parties with access to Registration Data relevant to addressing specific issues involving domain name registrations related to consumer protection, investigation of cybercrime, DNS abuse and intellectual property protection. 
>  
> The non-bold text was suggested by Amr/NCSG and the added bold text was an updated suggested by me/IPC and supported by the BC.  
>  
> Giving it a re-read again today I think additional word-smithing could be warranted, but for now I will resist and step away and let others share their thoughts. 
>  
> Alex
>  
> 
>  
> --
> ___________
> Alex Deacon
> Cole Valley Consulting
> alex at colevalleyconsulting.com
> +1.415.488.6009
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20180913/eca93588/attachment.html>