[Gnso-epdp-team] [Ext] RE: Proposed language in relation to process for amendments to RRAs

[Kurt Pritz]

On this, if the Contracted Parties state that this provision is no longer necessary, then I think we can drop this. 

For those on the Team not familiar with the registry-registrar landscape, it’d be good to give them some assurance that all TLDs (including small ones) must have processed these RRA changes by now so that dropping the streamlined process will not result in detriment to any party being on GDPR Compliance. 

So, with a reaffirmation from Contracted Parties, we’ll drop this from the recommendations. 

Kurt


> On Feb 6, 2019, at 2:02 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Marc, noted. 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Caitlin, Berry and Marika
> 
> On 06 Feb 2019, at 15:51, Anderson, Marc <mcanderson at verisign.com <mailto:mcanderson at verisign.com>> wrote:
> 
>> I am familiar with the existing process.  I’ll quibble a little over your response by saying that the temp spec did not replace the existing process.  What it did was create a (supplemental) streamlined approval process for RRA amendments that followed a template (later) agreed to by registries, registrars and ICANN org.
>>  
>> The need for this streamlined process has passed and I believe the correct course of action is to let it expire leaving the rigor of the existing RRA amendment process.
>>  
>> Best,
>> Marc
>>  
>>  
>> From: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>> 
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2019 4:38 PM
>> To: Anderson, Marc <mcanderson at verisign.com <mailto:mcanderson at verisign.com>>; gnso-epdp-team at icann.org <mailto:gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ext] RE: [Gnso-epdp-team] Proposed language in relation to process for amendments to RRAs
>>  
>> Thanks, Marc. As explained by Dan on the call earlier today, there is indeed an existing process for RRA amendments (pre Temp Spec). This process involves approval by ICANN and also requires action by the RrSG for each individual amendment. Absent a recommendation, the process would revert back to the pre Temp Spec one, once the Temporary Specification expires.
>>  
>> Best regards,
>>  
>> Caitlin, Berry and Marika
>>  
>> From: "Anderson, Marc" <mcanderson at verisign.com <mailto:mcanderson at verisign.com>>
>> Date: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 15:16
>> To: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>, "gnso-epdp-team at icann.org <mailto:gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>" <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org <mailto:gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>>
>> Subject: [Ext] RE: [Gnso-epdp-team] Proposed language in relation to process for amendments to RRAs
>>  
>> There already is a process for amending Registry Registrar Agreements (RRAs).  I don’t see that this language addresses a need or what it is trying to accomplish.  Absent a clearly defined need I don’t support this as a new recommendation.
>>  
>> Best,
>> Marc
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org <mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org>> On Behalf Of Marika Konings
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2019 3:00 PM
>> To: gnso-epdp-team at icann.org <mailto:gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] Proposed language in relation to process for amendments to RRAs
>>  
>> Dear EPDP Team,
>>  
>> In relation to the process for amendments to Registry – Registrar agreements, as discussed during today’s EPDP Team meeting, please find hereby the proposed language for inclusion in the implementation section of the report:
>>  
>> New Recommendation:
>> The EPDP Team recommends that, as part of the implementation, a process for amendments to Registry - Registrar agreements (RRAs) needed to implement the EPDP recommendations is considered.
>>  
>> If you have any concerns about this language, please indicate this by Thursday 7 February COB.
>>  
>> Best regards,
>>  
>> Caitlin, Berry and Marika
>>  
>> Marika Konings
>> Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 
>> Email: marika.konings at icann.org <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>  
>>  
>> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
>> Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_gnso&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=5DXgId95wrCsHi--pxTiJD7bMB9r-T5ytCn7od3CF2Q&s=Cg5uQf0yAfw-qlFZ0WNBfsLmmtBNUiH0SuI6Vg-gXBQ&e=> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gnso.icann.org_files_gnso_presentations_policy-2Defforts.htm-23newcomers&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=5DXgId95wrCsHi--pxTiJD7bMB9r-T5ytCn7od3CF2Q&s=tT-E2RoAucUb3pfL9zmlbRdq1sytaEf765KOEkBVCjk&e=>. 
>>  
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20190206/60929c59/attachment-0001.html>