[Gnso-epdp-team] Question 5 to the Community - clarification needed

[Alan Greenberg]

I can't recall whether there have been PDP 
reports that have been revised, but ICANN has 
revised other published papers before. Sometimes 
without evening annotating the cover page that it 
is revised - or changing the URL.

Hopefully, if this one is revised (and as I see 
it, the benefits far outweigh the problems), 
hopefully the cover page will note the revision 
and there will be a Revision list somewhere in the document.

Alan

At 2021-06-15 04:44 PM, Kapin, Laureen via Gnso-epdp-team wrote:

>Although what you describe about the rest of the 
>report is accurate, I still think the omission 
>of the word “anonymized” is simply a mistake 
>that we should correct and to let it stand 
>uncorrected will cause confusion.  Might you 
>explain why there is resistance to correcting 
>this simple error?  I suspect that PDP’s have 
>published corrected versions before.
>
>
>Kind regards,
>Laureen Kapin
>
>Acting Assistant Director
>Division of Consumer Response and Operations
>Bureau of Consumer Protection
>Federal Trade Commission
>
>From: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 4:36 PM
>To: Becky Burr <becky.burr at board.icann.org>; Kapin, Laureen <LKAPIN at ftc.gov>
>Cc: gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
>Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Question 5 to the 
>Community - clarification needed
>
>Please also note that the preceding section in 
>the Initial Report defines these terms (note, 
>there are also some footnotes that go with these definitions):
>
>·       "Registrant-based email contact", means 
>“an email for all domains registered by a 
>unique registrant [sponsored by a given 
>Registrar] OR [across Registrars], which is 
>intended to be pseudonymous data when processed by non-contracted parties.
>·       "Registration-based email contact", 
>means “a separate single use email for each 
>domain name registered by a unique registrant, 
>which is intended to be anonymous data when 
>processed by non-contracted parties.
>
>We can make sure that a reference to these 
>definitions is included in the public comment 
>form to make sure that those that only look at 
>the form have the appropriate context.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Caitlin, Berry and Marika
>
>From: Gnso-epdp-team 
><gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of 
>Becky Burr via Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
>Reply to: Becky Burr <becky.burr at board.icann.org>
>Date: Tuesday, 15 June 2021 at 21:59
>To: "Kapin, Laureen" <LKAPIN at ftc.gov>
>Cc: "gnso-epdp-team at icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
>Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Question 5 to the 
>Community - clarification needed
>
>do you mean pseudonymized rather than anonymized?
>
>
>On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 3:36 PM Kapin, Laureen 
>via Gnso-epdp-team 
><<mailto:gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>gnso-epdp-team at icann.org> wrote:
>In preparing for tomorrow’s presentation, I 
>realized that Question 5 to the Community omits 
>an important word, “anonymized.” We should correct this.
>
>Here is the Question from the Initial Report:
>
>EPDP Team Question for Community Input #5
>Does this guidance as written provide sufficient 
>information and resources to Registrars and 
>Registry Operators who wish to publish a 
>registrant- or registration-based email address? 
>If not, what is missing and why?
>
>Taken literally, this might leave the impression 
>that the Recommendation is to publish a standard 
>email address.  In fact, our deliberations 
>involved the publication of an anonymized (or 
>more precisely, pseudonymized) email address.  I 
>request that we correct this oversight both so 
>that our intention is clear and so that the 
>public comments solicited focus on the real 
>topic to consider – whether to publish some 
>formm of an anonymized email address.
>
>I propose that we publish a corrected version of 
>the Initial Report that inserts the word 
>“anonymized” prior to “registrant- or 
>registration-based email address” to correct this oversight.
>
>
>Kind regards,
>Laureen Kapin
>
>Acting Assistant Director
>Division of Consumer Response and Operations
>Bureau of Consumer Protection
>Federal Trade Commission
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
><mailto:Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
>_______________________________________________
>By submitting your personal data, you consent to 
>the processing of your personal data for 
>purposes of subscribing to this mailing list 
>accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy 
>(<https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) 
>and the website Terms of Service 
>(<https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). 
>You can visit the Mailman link above to change 
>your membership status or configuration, 
>including unsubscribing, setting digest-style 
>delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
>Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
>_______________________________________________
>By submitting your personal data, you consent to 
>the processing of your personal data for 
>purposes of subscribing to this mailing list 
>accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy 
>(https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the 
>website Terms of Service 
>(https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can 
>visit the Mailman link above to change your 
>membership status or configuration, including 
>unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or 
>disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20210616/f018e310/attachment-0001.html>