[Gnso-epdp-team] On the proposed guidance

[Volker Greimann]

Hi Brian,

the easiest way to comply with data protection law is to simply treat all
registration data as if it were personal data. No chance of ever running
afoul data protection law if you do that correctly and it is pretty easy to
demonstrate as well.

-- 
Volker A. Greimann
General Counsel and Policy Manager
*KEY-SYSTEMS GMBH*

T: +49 6894 9396901
M: +49 6894 9396851
F: +49 6894 9396851
W: www.key-systems.net

Key-Systems GmbH is a company registered at the local court of
Saarbruecken, Germany with the registration no. HR B 18835
CEO: Oliver Fries and Robert Birkner

Part of the CentralNic Group PLC (LON: CNIC) a company registered in
England and Wales with company number 8576358.

This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended only for
the person(s) directly addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,
any use, copying, transmission, distribution, or other forms of
dissemination is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete this
email with any files that may be attached.


On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 5:47 PM King, Brian via Gnso-epdp-team <
gnso-epdp-team at icann.org> wrote:

> Hi Milton,
>
>
>
> Thank you for the constructive intervention. Your point is well taken, and
> I can certainly see that from the RNH perspective.
>
>
>
> One feature of data protection law related to your point is that it
> requires data controllers and processors to be able to demonstrate
> compliance with the law. A controller or processor could doubtfully
> demonstrate compliance with data protection law if they had not determined
> whether they were actually processing personal data. In fact, data
> protection professionals will tell you that you absolutely must determine
> what personal data you’re processing as the first step toward compliance
> with data protection law. It seems the policy question is: what, if
> anything, should contracted parties be required to do based on the status
> of the data? Is that right?
>
>
>
> As always, we’re happy to work with you and look forward to finding
> consensus.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Brian J. King*​
> *He/Him/His*
>
> Head of Policy and Advocacy, Intellectual Property Group
>
>
> T +1 443 761 3726​
>
> Time zone: US Eastern Time
>
>
>
> clarivate.com <http://www.clarivate.com> | Accelerating innovation
>
> Follow us on LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/clarivate>,
> Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/clarivate?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor>,
> Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/clarivate/> and Instagram
> <https://www.instagram.com/clarivateofficial/?hl=en>
>
>
>
> *From:* Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Mueller,
> Milton L via Gnso-epdp-team
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 24, 2021 11:13 AM
> *To:* gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Gnso-epdp-team] On the proposed guidance
>
>
>
> I was reading through two documents setting out in detail the proposed
> guidance on legal/natural.
>
> There seems to be more than one Google doc on this and I am not sure which
> one is the latest or most official, though I suspect it is the one with
> various people’s comments crawling all over it.
>
>
>
> I was pretty supportive of the Guidance overall. I had one problem with
> it, though.
>
> I liked the description of HOW the differentiation needed to take place.
> But in describing WHEN differentiation takes place and WHO would do it, it
> sets out 3 “high level scenarios”.
>
> The first two are ok. The third scenario (listed as #5 in the document) is
> that the Registrar does it for the RNH, based on “inferences.”
>
>
>
> That option just doesn’t fly for those of us representing RNH’s in this
> process. We cannot have a registrant’s disclosure status or person type
> determined FOR them by someone else. If we can strike that part of the
> guidance, I think we can be on our way to a much broader consensus.
>
>
>
> Dr. Milton L Mueller
>
> Georgia Institute of Technology
>
> School of Public Policy
>
> [image: IGP_logo_gold block]
>
>
>
> Confidentiality note: This e-mail may contain confidential information
> from Clarivate. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this e-mail is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> delete this e-mail and notify the sender immediately.
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20210324/7f5fbf17/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11497 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20210324/7f5fbf17/image002-0001.png>