<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><div class="gmail_default">Hello Kurt and EPDP,</div><div class="gmail_default"><br></div><div class="gmail_default">Below are our comments on the report.</div><div class="gmail_default"><br></div><div class="gmail_default"><br></div><div class="gmail_default">1. It should be clarified that where NCSG indicated "No Strong Opinion", it solely meant a deferral and it reserves the right to discuss issues related to those sections.</div><div class="gmail_default"><br></div><div class="gmail_default">2. Please add a clarification to the following paragraph: "<span style="color:black;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:11pt">After the first meeting, it was realized there would be few areas of consensus that sections were supported as written so it was decided to not spend time attempting to reach consensus on any section during the triage stage." </span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="color:black;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:11pt"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="color:black;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:11pt"><b>Clarification:</b></span></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"></p><div class="gmail_default"><i>Despite having been required by the EPDP charter to provide a</i> "Full consensus support" triage report, "<span style="color:black;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:11pt">After the first meeting, it was realized there would be few areas of consensus that sections were supported as written so it was decided to not spend time attempting to reach consensus on any section during the triage stage." <i> Hence this document should not be treated as a consensus document</i>. </span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="color:black;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:11pt"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri, sans-serif"><span style="font-size:14.6667px">3. page, 4<span class="gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr_ gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr_2553 gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr-alert gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr_gramm gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr_inline_cards gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr_run_anim gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-Style gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-replaceWithoutSep" id="gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-2553" style="display:inline;border-bottom:2px solid transparent;background-repeat:no-repeat;color:inherit;font-size:inherit">,"</span></span></font><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px">A summary chart indicating which teams supported individual Temporary Specification sections" this has to change <span class="gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr_ gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr_2932 gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr-alert gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr_gramm gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr_inline_cards gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr_run_anim gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-Punctuation gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-only-del gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-replaceWithoutSep" id="gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-2932" style="display:inline;border-bottom:2px solid transparent;background-repeat:no-repeat;color:inherit;font-size:inherit">to: </span> a summary chart indicating each <b>team's opinion </b>about each section of temp spec." The chart really does not relay support as such. it is inclusive of support and disagreements. so opinion might be a better word. </span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:black;font-size:11pt">4. Paragraph 1, page 8: "</span><font color="#000000" face="Calibri, sans-serif"><span style="font-size:14.6667px">Importantly, there was often agreement on broad principles, but those areas of agreement are hidden in this chart where the combination of sections into one line item or suggested minor edits resulted in “not supporting the language as written.”</span></font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri, sans-serif"><span style="font-size:14.6667px">This paragraph should be removed. "Agreement on broad principles" iwithout mentioning those principles makes it obscure. We need to either name the broad principles (which can't happen now) or we should remove.</span></font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri, sans-serif"><span style="font-size:14.6667px"><br></span></font></div><div class="gmail_default"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri, sans-serif"><span style="font-size:14.6667px"><br class="gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-Apple-interchange-newline">5.page 8, Paragraph 4: "</span></font><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:11pt">The Registry Stakeholder Group, when disagreeing with a section, often voiced general agreement but with certain changes recommended." </span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:11pt">We would like to know if the RySG stated this in a comment and if not which methodology has been used to determine it "often" voiced "general agreement". The more general point is that, c<span class="gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr_ gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr_3876 gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr-alert gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr_gramm gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr_inline_cards gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-gr_run_anim gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-Punctuation gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-only-ins gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-replaceWithoutSep" id="gmail-m_-1402760082158430448gmail-3876" style="display:inline;border-bottom:2px solid transparent;background-repeat:no-repeat;color:inherit;font-size:inherit">ertainly</span> there are agreements on some issues but the table is inconclusive in showing nuances and agreements. </span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:11pt"><br></span></div><br class="gmail-Apple-interchange-newline"></div></div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Farzaneh </font></div></div></div></div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 8:07 AM Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Kurt and All,<br>
<br>
The NCSG members of the EPDP Team are still reviewing the final version of the Triage report. Apologies for the late request, but would it be possible to postpone delivery of the report to the GNSO Council until COB, Monday 10 September? We expect to be able to provide feedback (if any) before the weekend is over. I hope this isn’t too troublesome a request.<br>
<br>
Thanks.<br>
<br>
Amr<br>
<br>
> On Sep 4, 2018, at 8:54 AM, Kurt Pritz <<a href="mailto:kurt@kjpritz.com" target="_blank">kurt@kjpritz.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> Hi Everyone: <br>
> <br>
> Attached is a redline and clean version of the Triage report. There is no need to review this before today’s meeting.<br>
> <br>
> I have taken out all the Issue Summaries in order to simplify the report and amended the high-level themes in line with the comments. <br>
> <br>
> Let me know your thoughts. I plan to send this out this week.<br>
> <br>
> Kurt<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" target="_blank">Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team</a><gnso-EPDP-Triage-final-report-20180831(clean).docx><gnso-EPDP-Triage-final-report-20180831.docx><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" target="_blank">Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team</a></blockquote></div>