<div dir="ltr">Dear All,<div><br></div><div>Let me explain thinking behind the "Decentralized" model.</div><div>It has been mentioned during the Team conversation that "status quo improved" can not be ruled out. Today there isn't system but decentralized mechanism of sending request for private registration information disclosure. Sometimes these requests are answered, sometimes remain without reply.</div><div>Improvements in the current mechanism could be done through standardization of procedures that would be applied by both - requesting entities and responding entities without changing the decentralized nature of mechanism.</div><div>If processes that would be applied in "Status Quo improved" will be standardized, then this mechanism could be qualified as "Standardized System of Access/Disclosure (SSAD)". </div><div>I acknowledge that the Team has agreed on "centralized gateway approach" and works on this assumption. But as a theoretical model "decentralized - status Quo improved" has a justification to exist within defined parameters of our task.</div><div><br></div><div>I do not insist on retaining of this option in the initial report, but just wanted to explain the reason behind putting the option in the draft.</div><div><br></div><div>JK</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:46 PM Mueller, Milton L <<a href="mailto:milton@gatech.edu">milton@gatech.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US">
<div class="gmail-m_-6830974840748553734WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)">That’s the correct way to put it, Volker. No consensus, no SSAD. Perhaps the draft report can be modified to indicate that.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)">--MM<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt solid rgb(225,225,225);padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11pt;color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11pt;color:windowtext"> Gnso-epdp-team <<a href="mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Volker Greimann<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, December 3, 2019 7:38 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-epdp-team@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Draft Initial Report<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p>Ultimately, the "no-SSAD" "option" describes the status quo. In other words, if we as a group fail to reach consensus this is what we'll have, regardless of what we want. Maybe this can serve as encouragement to move away from extreme positions that have
a rabbits chance in a snake pit to survive a consensus call... <u></u><u></u></p>
<p>Volker<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Am 03.12.2019 um 13:26 schrieb Mueller, Milton L:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Ha, you spoiled the agreement, Brian. ;-)</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)">></span><span style="font-size:11pt">If I can go so far, I suggest that the initial report indicate that we are
</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)">> </span><span style="font-size:11pt">working primarily toward the “centralized” model pending crucial input from the DPB.
</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)">This is not our understanding at all. One reason I want to eliminate the “no SSAD” option is that I think it confuses the issue of centralizing requests, which can be done and can gain consensus,
versus centralizing the decision maker, which I think is deeply problematic and will never gain consensus.
</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><br>
<br>
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Gnso-epdp-team mailing list<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre><a href="mailto:Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" target="_blank">Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org</a><u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team</a><u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>_______________________________________________<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>) and the website Terms of Service (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.<u></u><u></u></pre>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">-- <br>
Volker A. Greimann<br>
General Counsel and Policy Manager<br>
<strong>KEY-SYSTEMS GMBH</strong><br>
<br>
T: +49 6894 9396901<br>
M: +49 6894 9396851<br>
F: +49 6894 9396851<br>
W: <a href="http://www.key-systems.net" target="_blank">www.key-systems.net</a><br>
<br>
Key-Systems GmbH is a company registered at the local court of Saarbruecken, Germany with the registration no. HR B 18835<br>
CEO: Alexander Siffrin<br>
<br>
Part of the CentralNic Group PLC (LON: CNIC) a company registered in England and Wales with company number 8576358.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" target="_blank">Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>) and the website Terms of Service (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.</blockquote></div>